___  ___    _ _    _  _ _____   _____
 / __|/ _ \  | | |  | || |_ _\ \ / / __|
| (_ | (_) | |_  _| | __ || | \ V /| _|
 \___|\___/    |_|  |_||_|___| \_/ |___|

 --- A GOPHER-LIKE INTERFACE FOR HIVE BLOCKCHAIN ---

Net Neutrality Repeal Survivor's Log Day 7

BY: @adamkokesh | CREATED: May 3, 2018, 4:33 a.m. | VOTES: 133 | PAYOUT: $119.07 | [ VOTE ]

Want to help me finally free America from the federal government? http://KokeshForPresident.com

If you are on Steemit, please click the image to watch the video!

Get the MOST IMPORTANT BOOK EVER for FREE in every format including audiobook at http://thefreedomline.com/freedom

Please support FREEDOM! by liking and sharing this video, subscribing, and sharing! Then for everything else: http://TheFreedomLine.com

Whoever has the top comment on this post after 24 hours can claim a free signed copy of FREEDOM! by sending me an email with their address to adam@thefreedomline.com.

▶️ DTube ▶️ IPFS

TAGS: [ #freedom ] [ #government ] [ #internet ] [ #politics ] [ #dtube ]

Replies

@chetoblackmetal | May 3, 2018, 4:35 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

very original I love your post, I served your contribution and in the way that plasma the conntino thank you and success in your projects

@anzirpasai | May 3, 2018, 4:36 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

Thanks sir @adamkokesh.
I always follow your video on youtube.

@james1122 | May 3, 2018, 4:40 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

Awesome post!! Keep it up and check out THIS POST as well as I have something similar.

@fackrurrazi | May 3, 2018, 4:42 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

good vidio, quite a lot of times that supports you in the liberation of america from federal.

@jonyoudyer | May 3, 2018, 4:44 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

Thank god im to busy steeming to pay any attention what the damn media says nowadays.

@ychaudrys | May 3, 2018, 4:47 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

we all need freedom net neutrality sucks not fair this is american supposedly the icon of freedom i love this country and i hope we can keep our freedom.

@yungchief | May 3, 2018, 4:47 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

Net Neutrality a social internet. Government wants people to pay high for internet service thereby trying to lay down rules so every internet activities will be controlled.

@james1122 | May 3, 2018, 4:49 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

Awesome post!! Keep it up and check out THIS POST as well as I have something similar.

@nzfxtrader | May 3, 2018, 4:49 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

It's official: the Senate will discharge a petition on May 9th and force a vote to overturn the FCC repeal and SAVE #NETNEUTRALITY! Put your site or social media profile on #RedAlert starting May 9!

@cyberblock | May 3, 2018, 5:02 a.m. | Votes: 3 | [ VOTE ]

It's time to reveal there hidden agenda! Everyone needs to know the truth! Great video :)

@shucona | May 3, 2018, 5:03 a.m. | Votes: 1 | [ VOTE ]

Thanks for sharing this double.
I served your contribution and in the way that plasma the conntino thank you .

@mahera | May 3, 2018, 5:04 a.m. | Votes: 1 | [ VOTE ]

one of the executive retail senior on the phone has a theory called "seven rescue retail." he explained that when you see the retailers that sells products made by the another company, shop multi-brand if you want, there are seven of them. do with good enough that their survival possible. if you are not one of the seven people who survived in the list, executive this to say that strategy that you use to adapt don't quite a good and there question Mark on the feasibility of your future. some time ago, it makes no sense to talk about a large number of retailers that may not work, the idea that silly. but the prospect of many retailers Heritage now so serious so that people named the seven rescue could not be quoted his name - it too real and too terrible. do in the industry will be threatened if he explained that he felt so many retailers that may not going to survive. that's state of retail - fact can't even talked about because too painful and weight. victims are in the three groups. there are a group of three people who live in Seattle. there are three-based in the middle of the state. and there are a wildcard.

1.geng Seattle Amazon.

Yes of course. they dominate ecommerce, they have a very low cost of capital that allows them to try almost any (about that in this blog post previous), and they grow as monster. of course there risk in their business but list of people who survived not have the Amazon on it is not a real.

2.costco.

they have differentiate themselves with the offerings and relationship prices their way to make their position safer than others much like them. they are not grow as Amazon but they have the presence and strong identity. they profitable and their operations very efficient. they are working on margin very thin and the risk but menggusurnya would be very difficult for anyone. uniqueness they make their target acquisition interesting but scale they will be scary for the acquirer anything.

3.nordstrom.

they focus on the high service at the time it's just one of the few legal way to operate a Department store. now because almost all the other way operate Department store questionable, their focus on services will allow them to be a person who survived in the industry where selling brand others model is more questionable than ever.

4.wal-Mart.

not only that Walmart is the largest retailer in the world, it is that he uses its resources to adapt. no one knows what the future of experience store will look as though it began to take the form (more about that in this blog previous). Walmart using position and financial strength to find any possible solutions and give it a try. if they continue to do that, they will be able to create offers the right that will ensure their survival. in particular, the acquisition jet.com and acquisition related next show derring-do that has the potential to change their perception of the consumer.

5.target.

arget always built to adapt and they continue to do so. financial performance they have not been shown growth but skills merchandising them, including the partnership with Casper and others as well as the collection capsule them with designer famous, to make their store interesting. willingness to try new things that means they are likely to find the right formula from time to time.

6.kohl's.

they have a long history in developing exclusive products and presentation and strategy innovative. recent they announced the testing of partnership with Amazon to do the drop-off and pickup in 82 stores with special room and parking for the customers Amazon that has a surprise, more than 80% overlap, as a buyer Amazon. integration their online with retail Heritage has been very think ahead and their adaptation of the mobile phone has a very good.

7.teluk Hudson.

not brand owned by their - Saks, Lord & Taylor, gilts Groupe and others - adapt to both individual; it is the parent company who are willing to do the things that there will be no other people. buy gilts are the steps valiant when they do so. in particular, change the store Lord & Taylor mainstay in new York to be most wework very innovative and intelligent financially. willingness to use the brand and their space to adapt to give them the opportunity wildcard to be one of survivors. when the executive check out the list, all commentators other industry on the phone say Yes, it makes sense. no consensus that brings together the idea that everyone is outside the seven people need to change the way they do things to ensure their survival. some of the other retailers have a strong balance sheet that will allow them to go for a long time. but they will not be developed unless they change their approach. types necessary changes in the top of changes in culture and it is the type of changes in the most difficult to do. seventh retailers have invested in customer experience in stores and online with clear focus on the acquisition, value, the service, and comfort new customers. they have a program loyalty strong and above all, permission from C.-suite them to take the plunge and make a mistake along the way.

@adamkokesh are people who wrote the book of freedom, book only 100 sheet is very easy to understand. you must read it and I am sure you will agree with me. here we can find a book for free in the form of the text version and audio to read your-really @adam kokesh

https://thefreedomline.com/freedom/

@adamkokesh run as President of the United States 2020 I strongly support @adamkokesh as President of the United 2020. this will be brought United in freedom. support I always accompanied and I will invite friends to support your @adamkokesh

@dreamzar | May 3, 2018, 5:06 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

https://www.steemit.com/steemhumans/@dreamzar/steem-humans-4-questions-with-adamkokesh-58e88e6929188

steem humans 4 questions with @adamkokesh

@truthabides | May 3, 2018, 5:31 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmaUUoSw8jq7DjThGo5yV92WDEw4RHH3ogbiaxNDwe3iDA/should_NO.jpg]

[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmf24yuyBzN5QSkJCNoaWvegH5ym7RecqxtFnBAhsdLVfe/fcc800x800.jpg]

The Fairness Doctrine ..was a policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was - in the Commission's view - honest, equitable, and balanced. The FCC eliminated the Doctrine in 1987, and in August 2011 the FCC formally removed the language that implemented the Doctrine.

@anupomdas | May 3, 2018, 5:53 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

Constitutional government is defined by the existence of a constitution—which may be a legal instrument or merely a set of fixed norms or principles generally accepted as the fundamental law of the polity—that effectively controls the exercise of political power. The essence of constitutionalism is the control of power by its distribution among several state organs or offices in such a way that they are each subjected to reciprocal controls and forced to cooperate in formulating the will of the state.
@adamkokesh Sir,
I appreciate that you don't support this !
Freedom should be everywhere : )

@nirobdas | May 3, 2018, 5:58 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

The essence of constitutionalism is the control of power by its distribution among several state organs or offices in such a way that they are each subjected to reciprocal controls and forced to cooperate in formulating the will of the state.
@adamkokesh Sir,
I appreciate that you don't support this !
Freedom should be everywhere : )

@teenovision | May 3, 2018, 6:19 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

their should not be any hidden agenda and it should be quickly revealed

@johndilan | May 3, 2018, 10:07 a.m. | Votes: 1 | [ VOTE ]

wow you're retarded af. Your providers can now legally use ai to find out at what point people give up seeking information, as in what is the minimum amount of throttling a required for a huge chuck of the population to give up trying watch let's say your videos and dictate their narrative in this way. They don't have to disclose shit now.
Can't believe you instead took time to call out the normies debating about if they have to pay an extra fee or something lmao.

@eliyanafox | May 3, 2018, 12:54 p.m. | Votes: 2 | [ VOTE ]

Net neutrality

is the principle that governments should mandate Internet service providers to treat all data on the Internet the same, and not discriminate or charge differently by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or method of communication.[4] For instance, under these principles, internet service providers are unable to intentionally block, slow down or charge money for specific websites and online content.
The term was coined by Columbia University media law professor Tim Wu in 2003, as an extension of the longstanding concept of a common carrier, which was used to describe the role of telephone systems

@sh-saimun | May 3, 2018, 1 p.m. | Votes: 1 | [ VOTE ]

Net neutrality is simply a rule preventing anyone from regulating the internet, so please explain how a simple rule that prevents any kind of regulation turns into regulation? You can't because you're buying the lies about regulation and free markets that the likes of Ajit Pai are feeding you. The free market won't save you when it comes to ISPs because they're monopolies in most places and there is no market for them to have to compete against. Which is why it makes sense to treat the internet like utilities and have a basic rule that says NO ONE CAN REGULATE THE INTERNET AT ALL.

@jayed007 | May 3, 2018, 1:02 p.m. | Votes: 1 | [ VOTE ]

@adamkokesh Sir,
We are currently under Net Neutrality, and yet we still have choices as far as ISP packages from the fastest DSL all the way down to dial-up. Additionally if we have our own web page each web host has different packages at different prices available. Nobody is 'subsidizing' anyone else who streams a lot. If your internet needs are small, get a budget dial-up package. If you web page has very little traffic, get a cheap shared server deal. We have all sorts of choices and NN is not getting in the way, but is instead making our choices possible on the internet. Without NN, ISP's could use their control and power over the internet 'rail line switching stations' to act as legalized extortion racketeers by demanding payment from a website before allowing data traffic to come and go from a site. Like many regulations, NN is benevolent regulation that protects innocent people from harm. NN protects the public from corporate plutocrats for whom no amount of profit is ever enough -- they always want more. NN proactively protects people from ever becoming victims of a giant internet extortion racket.

@adamkun | May 3, 2018, 1:12 p.m. | Votes: 1 | [ VOTE ]

Net neutrality was started in the GWBush administration's FCC around 2005. It went through many court cases and iterations until it was codified in 2015. It did exist. Also, there wasn't the media/content consolidation, nor the market penetration of streaming when netflix streaming started. broadband usage has increased since netflix started streaming, but many people still only have access to one high speed broadband provider in their area. that provider is often owned by one of the major content creating companies (time warner, comcast, etc) and with those local monopolies, they would have an incentive to restrict access to competing content providers to generate more income for their stakeholders.
Thanks for your post @adamkokesh
Waiting for your next post.

@frozi | May 3, 2018, 2:01 p.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

To the honorable steemians especially to the citizens of America I am proud of.

@frozi | May 3, 2018, 7:42 p.m. | Votes: 1 | [ VOTE ]

Good leaders are leaders who will not
forget the services of heroes.
You may be a brave and faithful future leader.
congratulations to you @adamkokesh
you can do it.

[ BACK TO TRENDING ] [ BACK TO MENU ]
CMD>