___|  _ \   |  |    |   |_ _|\ \     / ____|
 |     |   |  |  |    |   |  |  \ \   /  __|
 |   | |   | ___ __|  ___ |  |   \ \ /   |
\____|\___/     _|   _|  _|___|   \_/   _____| 

 --- A GOPHER-LIKE INTERFACE FOR HIVE BLOCKCHAIN ---

Curation Efficiency Statistics - 2019-11-09 12:00 AM UTC

BY: @art.int | CREATED: Nov. 9, 2019, 12:01 a.m. | VOTES: 8 | PAYOUT: $0.00 | [ VOTE ]

Curation Efficiency Statistics[IMAGE: https://i.imgur.com/Xb8GIzk.png]Every 24 hours, this report is automatically generated to display the best 25 curators in the last 7 days (minimum 35 full votes - 3500% upvote strength - casted in that time frame)

It's the time of the vote that is taken into consideration, whether the posts the votes are casted on are payed out or not

[IMAGE: https://imgur.com/6hgLrRf.jpeg]
The 25 Best Curators in the last 7 Days [O$;1$[

# Username Total Votes Value $ Curation Rewards Value $ Curation Efficiency 1 attention-seeker 0.465 0.463 99.66 % 2 best-strategy 0.220 0.218 99.21 % 3 tech-coin 0.706 0.681 96.49 % 4 coinmarketcal2 0.595 0.572 96.08 % 5 daijiworld 0.539 0.518 96.07 % 6 sm-silva 0.325 0.295 90.78 % 7 steemfond 0.493 0.438 88.89 % 8 sirbush 0.172 0.149 86.68 % 9 samboy 0.596 0.513 86.05 % 10 morwen 0.939 0.803 85.51 % 11 foodhelp 0.583 0.494 84.75 % 12 janaveda 0.566 0.479 84.68 % 13 steemconsole 0.932 0.767 82.27 % 14 vestlife 0.192 0.156 81.19 % 15 vgalue 0.178 0.145 81.16 % 16 discovery-it 0.528 0.427 80.94 % 17 pondcrosser 0.667 0.534 80.06 % 18 arv1 0.925 0.740 80.00 % 19 zintarmortalis 0.860 0.682 79.31 % 20 el-panal 0.258 0.204 79.00 % 21 gabriellecd 0.256 0.201 78.61 % 22 richjr 0.485 0.379 78.01 % 23 the.curator 0.708 0.550 77.74 % 24 thebumplunderer 0.758 0.588 77.55 % 25 thesoundof 0.184 0.142 77.33 %

[IMAGE: https://imgur.com/6hgLrRf.jpeg]
The 25 Best Curators in the last 7 Days [1$:10$[

# Username Total Votes Value $ Curation Rewards Value $ Curation Efficiency 1 curx 4.327 4.477 103.47 % 2 whatsthatcryptom 2.740 2.645 96.53 % 3 apix 9.211 8.839 95.96 % 4 shea851 1.470 1.386 94.31 % 5 benedict08 7.345 6.919 94.21 % 6 mosquito76 5.659 5.148 90.98 % 7 hdu 8.397 7.430 88.48 % 8 ancient-light 2.003 1.766 88.16 % 9 coinmarketcal 6.249 5.468 87.51 % 10 sameer777 1.624 1.420 87.45 % 11 steem-d-anlovnit 1.365 1.189 87.12 % 12 xiguang 7.917 6.823 86.18 % 13 votes4minnows 2.576 2.186 84.86 % 14 inciter 3.414 2.895 84.79 % 15 steemitasclub 4.558 3.846 84.39 % 16 delabo 6.349 5.346 84.21 % 17 eliel 3.130 2.627 83.92 % 18 reazuliqbal 4.732 3.954 83.57 % 19 ezravandi 2.835 2.364 83.37 % 20 teofilex11 3.842 3.195 83.17 % 21 ebargains 1.014 0.840 82.77 % 22 la-colmena 1.884 1.558 82.70 % 23 dirapa 6.664 5.497 82.50 % 24 angelesdesteemit 5.165 4.250 82.29 % 25 pataty69 3.598 2.951 82.04 %

[IMAGE: https://imgur.com/6hgLrRf.jpeg]
The 25 Best Curators in the last 7 Days [10$:∞$[

# Username Total Votes Value $ Curation Rewards Value $ Curation Efficiency 1 art.int 175.580 177.240 100.95 % 2 gerber 42.744 39.923 93.40 % 3 miti 18.289 17.018 93.05 % 4 delishtreats 14.492 12.822 88.47 % 5 steem.services 29.055 24.997 86.03 % 6 runicar 26.272 22.400 85.26 % 7 luxbet 15.980 13.095 81.95 % 8 mehta 13.697 11.223 81.94 % 9 webdeals 33.200 27.121 81.69 % 10 mustard-seed 10.623 8.631 81.25 % 11 karja 36.836 29.306 79.56 % 12 tangofever 13.819 10.907 78.93 % 13 spt-skillup 30.129 23.730 78.76 % 14 reveur 16.220 12.692 78.25 % 15 nicestbot 18.824 14.669 77.93 % 16 discernente 14.753 11.317 76.71 % 17 penguinpablo 132.646 100.810 76.00 % 18 bluemist 68.087 51.733 75.98 % 19 accelerator 54.114 40.883 75.55 % 20 enjoyinglife 10.670 8.060 75.54 % 21 robmolecule 17.975 13.557 75.42 % 22 dado13btc 10.156 7.644 75.26 % 23 funnyman 23.905 17.535 73.35 % 24 aicu 37.011 27.107 73.24 % 25 mindtrap 42.982 30.717 71.46 %

[IMAGE: https://imgur.com/6hgLrRf.jpeg]
**Feel free to upvote my posts if these statistics are useful to you or if you base your curation strategy on trailing accounts based on these lists.

If you have any suggestions, want more / less / other data, feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to incorporate them !**

TAGS: [ #statistics ] [ #curation ] [ #steem ] [ #stats ] [ #efficiency ]

Replies

@clm | Nov. 10, 2019, 8:31 a.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

upon which criteria do you decide what weight to vote with?

@art.int | Nov. 10, 2019, 6:33 p.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

The higher the potential payouts, the higher the curation rewards to be distributed, the higher the vote can be.
My bot aims at keeping a steady ROI, so if he can choose between voting at 100% for a potential efficiency of 115% or voting at 1% for a potential efficiency of 125% (the smaller your vote, the higher the efficiency, that's the formula). So if he currently aims at 120% efficiency, he will vote at 50%.
I'm simplifying but that's the spirit.

@clm | Nov. 10, 2019, 9:25 p.m. | Votes: 0 | [ VOTE ]

This brightens up my knowledge, thanks. It's nice to see vote efficiency rise by just following your curation trail. Makes me think about powering up or lease some SP. A little profit always comes in handy ;). Seems that the votes go across the platform, so that's another plus.
Thanks for sharing!

[ BACK TO TRENDING ] [ BACK TO MENU ]
CMD>