If you want a legal news the technology should be developed...isnt it?.....

I like it .Upvote and FOllow . Please upvote me Thank you . @byltc

This post very nice..dtube is my best channel..thanks for sharing this post..

Who Upvote me , I;m Upvote(ALL SHARING) . and Follow

Woww @davidpakman my hope your upvote's :) please be happy :)

@davidpakman please upvote and Please say hello :) your big fan

What you did was the equivalent of running up to a man in the street and scream “GIVE ME MONEY” I don’t usually flag, but your actions aren’t becoming, please, if you have nothing to add or say, just don’t post anything.

nice video my friend....
its help for technology....
thanks for sharing

@davidpakman This is interest Your DTUBE information and skill professional :) <3 Happy upvote's :)

i agree with you and this is a technological news..
thanks your informative info..
carry on..

The big guy always wins! :(

Good video

wow .... afraid. trum shoot
@davidpakman will shoot me with 100 percent vote

Let's give internet regulation power to the FCC. So Trump can lean on providers to shut down "www.DonaldTrumpsucks.com".

Amazing how easy it is to get people to hand over their freedom to the state.

Hahaha.... checkmate son!

I've been hoping that it is so unpopular that lawmakers simply just couldn't let it pass. Thanks for the insight @davidpakman

excelent

Net Neutrality. A government solution to a government-created problem.

Not even that. The problem never even existed.
People are begging for more laws to protect them from fiction.
No ISP ever 'bundled' any website nor has plans to because they would obviously lose billions overnight if they tried.

Dear @davidpakman nice post I wish your support me Steemit thank you

Yep. The Dems are posturing on this one for fundraising purposes. Elections are coming up and they need the money! Not that the GOP doesn't do this kind of stuff, too!

Yeah but doesn't that kind of belie the reality that Net Neutrality is a good thing to support, regardless of reasons? We cannot afford to throw Net Neutrality supporters to the curb because they support it "for the wrong reasons." This is already a tenuous fight as it is, and any ally is one we need.

Our government is actively working against us.

Good video, as somebody who doesn't live in America this has been very informative. I hope other countries won't do the same, its bad enough when the USA drop net neutrality.

Sigh.... You do not know the situation and people are pulling on your heart strings.
There was nothing NEUTRAL about Net Neutrality and that is why the FCC threw it in the trash next to Obamacare or the Affordable Heath Care act that no one could afford.

True, I dont know the situation in the US but net neutrality is important. ISP already have more power than I would like them to have, even with net neutrality.

The ISPs are the ones that want Net Neutrality. If you would read it!!!
They tricked everyone but the FCC.
This is soooo backwards. It is like everything flipped. =o

It is disgusting to me that politicians care more about holding party lines and pleasing lobbyists than actually doing what the people they are supposed to representing want. Same with the organizations that are supposed to be put in place to protect the consumer... cough FCC cough.

I think this Net Neutrality has been the most obvious proof of that in my life time, and I hope that it will open peoples eyes to what our government has really become (or maybe always has been?).

My question to you... how do we fix this? What ultimately will change this "hold the party line" or "please the lobbyists" feeling of our representatives? There are plenty of examples of Dems doing this as well, it feels like its everyone. Term limits? Make lobbying illegal?

The way we fix this is to stop championing legislation that we have never read.
You know you have not read one word of the bill and are just in on the warm fuzzy name of Net Neutrality with Puppies.
If you read the legislation you would know that it gave the federal government the power to do the exact thing you are afraid of.
The FCC just saved us in the silent majority from you in the ignorant mob that were fooled by a friendly sounding name.

This is a very important topic, that I don't think aaaaa lot of people, that essentially live on the internet even have a clue about. Thank you so much for posting about the topics you do. Great work gentleman. Here we go, being hindered from getting things done due to the good 'ole pass around. Cheers guys! Keep posting.

Folks without a clue are always the loudest.
Maybe you could explain how giving the US federal government the authority to allocate bandwidth as a penalty to what it also has the power to determine is not 'neutral' is a good thing?
Maybe one of you that know so much about the legislation without reading one word of it can share some of this knowledge you were born with.

Yeah... This is going to cause A LOT of stink if they don't just put it back, lol. LOOK, we'll pretend you never touched if you just put it back where you found it.

I do not think I get your point man.

As in, reinstate the Net Neutrality they allowed the FCC to appeal (or not reinstate themselves, I can't remember which at the moment).

So you never even read the bill, have no clue what is in it and still want to jump on that bandwagon to have the government regulate your internet eh?
Are you really thinking or are you just trying to be accepted by the ignorant mob?
Maybe it would help to know the vast majority does not support government regulation of the free market. Only jobless antifa kids and the diversity hires do. They are loud but they are few in number.

Well no I haven't had a few hours to read thru their excessively long bill. I never jump on bandwagons. Tend to be the last one to. I just asked a question to as which it meant to over turn it. I know they like to name bills obtusely or even opposite what they are for. So, I was under the impression that the FCC had rejected the free access of the internet, and that was Net Neutrality. So, the government overturning said overturn would be a plus. But, if I am misunderstanding any of this, I was asking. Thank you for the information. I'll be sure to ride my bandwagon to another source of information.

Ya watch out for that band wagon.
Of course it seems like Net Neutrality is all about internet freedom. That is why they pick words like neutrality that tug on your feels.
It is the same for the Affordable Health Care Act because no one could afford it.
All Net Neutral did was poorly attempt to dictate how ISPs allocate their bandwidth. The reasons why the law was useless are all first year economics. In short the ISP would lose billions and likely go out of business if they tried to bundle Netflicks, which was the main terror of the ignorant mob.
What law does make sense is already in place. It is not legal for media companies to claim territory in the US. That law just needs to be enforced.

As for the internet being free that is up to ICANN which is up for sale to the highest bidder thanks to Obummer.

Well s&%# I didn't know that last part, for sure! So, Net Neutrality, the bill, is trash. As far as fingers in the honeypot, that is the internet, that's already done. I appreciate the clarity here. Sometimes it gets difficult to discern truth with all the noise and sources out there. Cheers!

Woohoo!
A Steem penny! xD
I could get to like this.

I bumped into something that might bring you a laugh or frustration, specifically on this topic, so I figured this a good place to share. Now, knowing things on this level are done for a reason. Some people have different agendas. What are your reactions to this: Burger King made a surprisingly good ad about net neutrality. Obviously, something cooked up for the consumers, no pun intended. But, are they explaining it even close to correct? Why would they speak against something now portrayed to me as something the corporations would want? Or just a big time wasting distraction, deed is done? I appreciate your angle on things, and your time. Cheers! When I have more than pennies, it'll be better :).
P.S. - Doesn't this behave similar to the blockchain? If so, is it really that bad? If you value your time so much you will pay for speed, then you should, in comparison, be providing a service highly valued by society enough to have said funds to spend excessively. Every measure more requires exponentially more energy to provide, so it's very indicative of how nature works in a way...without straying from the point here.

I am going with frustration. They are making a false analogy with their lousy food.
Paying to speed up the time it takes to stuff a burger into your face is actually more analogous to the actual market without NN. It comes off as them saying you should not be able to pay for more bandwidth. And that is just silly.
Also they left out the one thing that 99% of the customers would do. That is walk out the door and find some other nasty fast food to gobble on.
And that core fundamental right of our society to choose is what is being ignored. If the ISP tried to 'bundle' or otherwise not provide the service expected then all the customer has to do is cancel.
At any rate the NN regulations were useless because they did not provide any penalty for 'bundling'.
I guess everything that scales with use is similar to the blockchain in that regard. We can be thankful the development of storage medium has kept up with the need. So I think I can see your angle. The internet is like a growing plant that adapts to facilitate it's own growth. I never thought of it as natural before.

Itself, not natural, of course. But, it's patterns and interactions are a result of a natural system, us. So, like we have been able to notice similarities between small, natural system's growth and humans' population of the planet thru these large patterns we seem to follow. I would predict technology would still be subjected to these "natural" tendencies. My reference to the blockchain was in regards to how each block gets progressively more expensive to complete, correct? Just the way I understand up to this point. The encryption equations are getting ever more difficult requiring more computing power, therefore more energy per token. Hence the decrease in small time mining, because any single consumer device can't really make a dent in the problem. Again, speculating here based off my experiences thus far, and greatly appreciate someone with more, sharing theirs. Thank you.

The silent majority is letting your begging for more legislation to regulate ISPs fall on deaf ears.
The reason no one of consequence will ever care is because of economics 101 and simple common sense.
All you have to do is boycott your ISP or switch providers to solve your fears of your NetFlicks being bundled.
You will NEVER be able to regulate the free market without ruining everything you tried to fix.

How do you propose one switches their ISP when only one provider is available? Or when the only 2 options you have both are fucked?

For 30% of the population you are correct and they will have to do without the internet for a month or two.
Is that really outside of your realm of possibilities?
Most of the people in that 30% are rural anyhow and would likely not miss it much.
I think the issue here is that you might be addicted to the internet.

Ever wonder why you only have 1 or 2 ISPs in the area? Government sponsored monopolies. The same government that wants to help fix your issue now.

i apricate your post.and news... please carry on your task...