>I wonder why you guys don't support Litecoin.
I and I think most Bitcoin Cash users tend to support all working crypto in general and open, fair, communities.
>Litecoin proven itself through the test of time, similar technology to bitcoin and heck even took the source code from there.
Litecoin started out as a clone with changed coin supply and has since gone on to adopt other things, such as segwit. It's also not the same as the white paper by satoshi and there are many technical pros and cons of Litecoin, just as with other altcoins. On top of that, it isn't as widespread and has much less infrastructure and developers ready for it.
>Bitcoin cash is a one company fork by ViaBTC.
Bitcoin Cash has much wider support than by a single company. No matter how much influence the larger companies spearheading its adoption have, it's still decentralized as per the Bitcoin white paper. This is just fud.
>ViaBTC takes a large chunk in bitcoin mining pool as high as 11%. Roger Ver himself have a large mining company too (bitcoin.com) and Bitmain selling ASIC miner.
Good for them, they are taking a huge risk by establishing a competitor to the coin they already hold a ton of.
>Did I see any non miner in this group that supporting bcash? NOOO!
In which group exactly, the one you just picked out? There are many other supporters. The difference is that these are large companies that have chosen to invest and go public with their support. You wouldn't take notice otherwise.
>So why they fork? Simple. Miners' greed!!!
This is outright false and you should take a look at how miners have benefited from the inflated fees in Bitcoin Core these last few years. That's not normal. That is bribing the miners and preparing for a private monopoly on the blockchain. Normal users can't pay $100 fees when paying for groceries. Hell, forget about spreading Bitcoin Core/Segwit to low income countries at this point.
> Ever wonder why bitcoin cash high price only lasted a while and COINCIDENTALLY on the fall of bitcoins?
Because that's how markets move and have always moved? There was nothing unusual about it.
> It's all coordinated attack on bitcoin legacy chain! I won't try to explain too much how they attack it.
ummhm
>You can hear it from Jimmy Song stating bitcoin mining network turn off 30% overnight.
Miners can switch network back and forth to adjust for profitability and many did. That's how the system was always designed. Nothing new there. It didn't do anything to harm Bitcoin, which has had high fees and unreliable transactions for a long time now. It even saw continued price increases shortly after.
> So you guys are putting the future of blockchain, the world revolution that's about to overthrow the government, to this bunch of greedy miners?
No, we are taking back Bitcoin for us that were in it since back in 2010 or so and still have the same revolutionary vision that we had back then.
>SO what's the different to just use back fiat and let government tke over all over again? GUYS!! WAKE UP!!
Blockstream intends to sell you payment channels because you can't use the actual blockchain directly. How do you think that's gonna overthrow governments exactly? Those channels could much more easily be manipulated and controlled, just like todays banks. You won't be using the blockchain itself in any direct manner at all.
Best case scenario fees finally decline, but BTC security is decreased after having cost users a ton of money in fees and chaos for several years. No, I say you wake up.
>And another thing is bitcoin cash 8mb solution is just a temporary fix. What happen if we overused that block again?
The blocksize can be raised again and again, if technology continues to evolve, potentially in perpetuity. Should the development of technology be too slow, there is at least a huge market incentive to come up with funding or a second layer solution.
See, we don't actually reject all second layer solutions as some Core devs and supporters want everyone to believe. We just reject intentionally restricting access to the main chain.
