I have seen people call Hivemind a "layer 2", and non-chalantly calling to move more of the blockchain to layer 2.
For "real" layer 2, there needs to be fraud proofs or validation proofs that verifies everything on layer 2 with the same security and consensus mechanisms of layer 1. You have to tread very carefully moving stuff outside the blockchain. Otherwise, these are just hybrid centralized solutions.
See: optimistic rollups and plasma (fraud proofs) or zk Rollups (validation proofs) on ethereum for how it works.
Where are the fraud proofs or validation proofs for Hivemind? If I'm not mistaken, it's just a centralized database expressing parts of the blockchain in a more efficient manner.
As mentioned before, I'm very disappointed by the direction HF24 has taken, and will no longer trust this network and the witnesses running it, until I'm shown the mechanisms used to secure layer 2 with layer 1 consensus.
Which is what I'm saying, it's a centralized db. Whoever is using Hivemind is trusting the Hivemind node operator that the data is correct and identical to the layer 1 chain. Where's the fraud proof or validity proof to give me, an app user, that verification? What's stopping whoever is running the Hivemind node from manipulating data as they see fit before presenting to the user?
This is not layer 2. This is just a centralized db. My point is, layer 2 has a specific meaning in the blockchain space, and it is to do with a 2nd computational layer that has the same underlying security of layer 1. As with optimistic or zk Rollups on ethereum. Which is absolutely not the case here.
My point here, which is literally in the title of the post, then mentioned in the post itself, then again mentioned in my last reply to you is.... Wait, I'll just quote from my last reply:
> My point is, layer 2 has a specific meaning in the blockchain space, and it is to do with a 2nd computational layer that has the same underlying security of layer 1. As with optimistic or zk Rollups on ethereum. Which is absolutely not the case here.
So, stop calling Hivemind layer 2. I notice you never called it layer 2, and props to you for that, but I'd like to see other people here understand that too. That's it, that's all I'm saying. Hive is a vastly ignored chain that's #140 and perpetually falling down the ranks, it's best to follow the semantic conventions of other chains like Ethereum which have thousands of times greater economic activity and usage, if you want to attract any of their developers and users at all.
I've been thinking about proofs for Hivemind for a while, as I realized earlier on that there aren't any.
Short of a periodic hash fucntion tied to a data set that changes every block, but doesn't take too much to compute, I can't think of anything right now.
I also thought of hashing the various live objects that make up the Hivemind codebase, and have that exposed via API so people can poll randomly, or have the nodes broadcast it on chain, timestamped. I'm still reading on the inspect.getsource() function in Python, which gives results on actual live code. Still studying it so I can't say that it can work. Obviously taking a hash of code that's not live can be faked.
It's not feasible to hash the whole DB at intervals because read speeds and calc times are long.