Oprah is killing people like Facebook Mark and Bill Gates.
Oprah met with Rothschild at Davos.

she is very well connected with the elites

Absolutely, she is. Plus she has got alot of influence too.

I liked you're post, I am new, could you please follow me.

.

Enough with the stupid conspiracy theories

Thank you for this. What a nice treat. Hope you enjoy your weekend.
have a good day

The next America's Top President is already looking to be full of plenty of belly laughs.

The best thing about the Trump election was exposing the position for the joke it is.

good to see you back

Nice post !!

Being the first, or at least the first 5 commentators can provide many benefits. This will help the next visitor see what others are saying to one post. And if they find that your opinions are unique, interesting and useful, then most likely they will be interested to know you further. However, do not rush to comment. Always take time to thoroughly read the article and understand what is being said.

she seems alot like donald trump to me.

.

did she get that guy's consent before kissing him?

graet post

https://steemitimages.com/DQmRUDCbDYEKZxY1h7tTdqJaXLeZK4T2QiYZ6Dimp1mpCXm/QONVIyz.gif

The world will never know.

The world will never know.

The next America's Top President is already looking to be full of plenty of belly laughs.
Thank you for this. What a nice treat. Hope you enjoy your weekend.
have a good day @lukewearechange

I have to be honest... I cannot find a single human being that I trust in this position, as the high office has become far too powerful for one person. Cashing in on social capital in a very similar way to Donald Trump, this is equally as threatening to the right and the moderate as Trump is to the left and the moderate.

And as an agorist, I find EVERY presidential candidate highly threatening. I look forward to the next election cycle like I look forward to a colonoscopy... perhaps for the same reason.

There are 3 branches of government in the USA with the executive branch being only one branch. It is like the legs of a stool. One branch goes a bit crazy, and the other branches check and balance -- or so we hope. But yeah, maybe executive branch should be 5 presidents for the USA, one for North, one East, one West and one South and a 5th in Hawaii/Alaska.

I don't think that will happen, it would be seen as too convoluted, but Just to flesh out this idea, why not have Hawaii go west, Alaska go north, and instead have a 5th representative in the executive branch for the U.S. territories, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. It makes more sense than having a representative cover two pretty well unrelated states.

Like you say, or so we hope. It looks to me like the whole thing is a bit off the rails, all three branches.

great!

I had always known this would happen.

But did you know Oprah will run in 2020 AGAINST Dwayne Johnson?

[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmPZ9YsQNQgdmAURVLPJtSwr19mvWvJQ7AfPvx6ouk4L42/dwaynejohnson759.jpg]

IF trump can be president, Dwayne Johson is a better option hehehe.

Even Jesse Ventura might be tempted to come back onto the grid!!

Rock has her covered! haha

I stand with the rock!

yes its called the democratic primaries

Maybe it will be Oprah with the Rock as Vice President that makes much more sense

I will be pretending to work for the Democrats giving them advice which may seem good at first but which will sabotage them... the democrats and their disgusting communism "democratic socialists" are nothing but communists

Politics has ben reduced to pro wrestling... but my friend @uncerntropy had been claiming this made a since 2007 ... ever since he saw Obama and hillary on stage talking like The Rock or Stone COld Steve Austin we KNEW that American Politics is like Wrestling

Mark Cuban

I am sooooo going to love if the Demoncrats think it's a great idea to put a celebrity as their nominee. They are going to be utterly destroyed!

idk man it seems like Oprah would be a better candidate with a higher chance of winning than any other current democratic politician that I can think of.

Really....and Trump isn't a celebrity? or a dumbass? Because he's both smh.

Haha I like Dwayne Johnson.

Iranian regime change. Korean nuclear war. Alt media censorship. Anything can happen.

And none of us really have a deep insight into what will happen. All we have control over is our surroundings. But that's how it always has been. It's just that now with the Internet we get a feeling of fear of missing out and that we need to know every single thing. Even though we have no control over it. As Jordan B Peterson have said in YouTube videos. We should all just Focus on clean our own room and make it perfect. Then we can look more at other stuff in the world.

HAHAHAHA heared it today in the morning news and I was just WTF?! :-)

Awesome! Wonderful! Great! Fantastic! Nice! Beautiful! Excellent! Fine! Masterpiece! Stupendous!

But definitely not weird

Nic party

Hopefully, the U.S. government will fall before she can get elected.

interesting posts I like your posts. because your post can be an insight for me and users steemit .. post interesting .. thanks for you.

Hopefully, the U.S. government will fall before she can get elected...

Oh, It certainly does.

Anyone smart enough to figure out how to open doors can connect the dots that big O was buddy buddy with evil Whine Steenie. All of Hollywood must burn.

Really good post bro

that's right

thanks i appreciate that, been hard getting back to everything but getting in the flow now

Well. that's nice to know.

I am a Chinese, do you dare to follow me?

Reposted, great post. As always. 😀

very good post

Past Election spending has reached to billion dollars . The Social responsibility is just a term now a days. Social image , Election spending , mockery and other take lead than the important facts.

May be she is good, may be not. Everybody things My one vote doesn't count much on the ballet, but actually it does which is giving your thought away and voting for it. Now a days thoughts solves lot of problems and earns or saves fiat currency

Oprah's scariest speech yet --"whole generation just needs to die"....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1sWsn1Q8lk

Oprah's Cambodian style solution to older folks. Long Pol Pot and child soldiers....
https://sydneyjewishmuseum.com.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/54d11a7ac693a.image_.jpg

I'm probably in the wrong side of steemit to be saying this, but an 18 second clip that starts in the middle of a sentence hardly gives you any context to what is being discussed.

It sounds like she is talking about a potential end to racism, saying (this is the entirety of the snippet posted) "... still, and there is a whole generation, I say this, you know, I said this, you know, for apartheid South Africa, I said this for my own, you know, community in the south, there are still generations of people, older people born and bred and marinated in it, in that prejudice and racism, and they just have to die."

It isn't as sensational to understand she is saying that racism is mostly generational, and younger generations don't have as many predetermined thoughts on people based on appearances, and that a lot of those ideas will die off with the people that still hold them, oh FUCK no. She was obviously saying we should round up old people in ghettos, and sick our child army on them.

I love my family, but some of the things I was told and warned about growing up was despicable. I was told to be careful drinking from public fountains because you never knew 'whose big lips had been on it'. I got to be older and was talking to my great grandfather who went on a rant about miscegenation and the dangers of mixing "mongoloid blood" with ours. I was so steeped in it, that for a while I would get nervous walking down the street passing someone because they might be one of those "lazy thugs". I no longer hold any of those beliefs, but the memories are there, and like it or not Oprah is right, for those ideas to die off, it's just a matter of time, because I won't be here forever, and I refuse to talk to my children the way I was talked to.

Edit: I thought you just pulled that out of nowhere ben, but apparently @lukewearechange used the same snippet, and the same "She wants to cull the old people population!" disinformation.

I guess if you read this Luke, I would like to know what makes you jump to the eugenics and genocide side of that so quick when given full context of the interview, she is saying a generation will die [naturally] and the ideas they hold will die with them (which is an inevitability). Is your Occam's Razor broken?

2nd Edit: I was going through your sources hoping that you had maybe done some due diligence and found the whole bbc interview with Oprah (or at least something longer than ~20 seconds), couldn't find it and started clicking through, found the WSJ one about, in your words, "culling the human population", I think using that as a source might have been a little disingenuous on your part, you seem to rely much more heavily on a link in that article.

I'm upvoting you because you obviously took a lot of time to type this.
YAY it gave you a whole penny
cheers

Nice post

Go take your walk at Hollywood and Vine at 9pm on a Friday Night. You will get a huge serving of red pills.

I guess I don’t understand your meaning...

First of all, much respect to you for listening to the entire speech and not just the sound bite, and trying to determine her meaning from context. Too often, a few words are separated from their context and take on an entire new meaning. I applaud you for investigating instead of reacting on knee-jerk impulses.
Now having said that, I too have analyzed it, and I don't agree with your analysis. Even in context, when I read "they just have to die," I don't take that as "we need to wait for them to pass on." I am left with the impression that it means exactly what it's being presented as in this article: a call to expedite their death. If she'd said "we need to wait for them to die," or even if she'd included the word "off" at the end of the quote, then I could see where you're coming from. But the way she said it, it sounds to me like an Ingsoc devotee grumbling "Oldthinkers unbellyfeel Ingsoc," calling for the death of the "Oldthinkers."
Am I inside Oprah Winfrey's head? Thank God above, no. Ergo, I could be wrong. She may have meant it as you are suggesting.
But That's honestly not the impression I was left with, especially in light of the fact that this "white people need to die" rhetoric is being shouted with no veils or innuendos whatsoever by a massive swath of the very voter base she would be appealing to.

First, I want to clarify, I couldn’t find the whole interview from the bbc I was quoting, I had to work, so I couldn’t keep hunting for it.

I am curious to know why you imagine the intent is in hastening their death (who else would watch any of her content lol) instead of minced words in an unscripted interview.

Maybe I just lived a very sheltered life, but I had never really met any of the “honkies need to die” folks that didn’t come to that opinion because of the overall attitude and treatment that was reflected to them, I also never met a white racist that didn’t have some justifications for why they dislike other ethnicities. We need to all realize life isn’t some team sport we need to pick sides on, and it isn’t a free for all either. We are all on the boat, it doesn’t matter if you paid to be there or if you are paid to be there, if the ship is taking on water, we should all be proactive.

Taking a 20 second clip that sounds minced, is that putting people together or against one another?

It's a valid complaint because what Oprah said, what if Trump had said the same thing? Now come on, people would be all over him. But what Oprah said, and I think the clip alone adequately shows it, is that "A WHOLE GENERATION NEEDS TO DIE."

Well, Hello Oprah...part of that Generation. I guess you just need to crawl off and die.

Fair's fair, right? lol...

If you use quotes, it's best to quote it accurately at least, please look at my comment where I directly transcribed the 20 second excerpt.

Also, Trump said during his campaign (note: Oprah hasn't even confirmed or denied a bid to run, this has all been other people saying she should) that he could shoot someone in the middle of the street and he wouldn't lose votes. Much less ambiguous wouldn't you say? I wasn't there saying "TRUMP WANTS TO GO ON A STREET WIDE SHOOTING SPREE!", in fact, I can't find a trace that anyone even took it that way.

Also, if you check out the transcription, I wouldn't be saying I'm a member of the generation Oprah was talking about, She's talking about South African apartheid supporters and Old South segregationists, but if you insist the shoe fits, why not scream it to the block chain to be immutable?

Well, that was food for thought. I'll give you that.
But after such thought, I still have to make the statement that I can't agree.
To your question of "why," I'd need more psychology training than I have (I've taken plenty of Ed Psych for my current career and plenty of criminology for my former one, but not a lot of general psych) to know, much less explain.
Innuendos and implications are always subtle, and they're perceived through the lens of the listener more than the mouth of the speaker sometimes. All I can say is "when I listen to what she said and compare it to what I'm hearing all around me, this is what it sounded like."
As to the possibility that you've lived a sheltered life, the reverse may be true. I may be seeing through an abnormally harsh lens. My experience may not exactly be mainstream. I grew up a member of the token white family in a neighborhood where being found guilty of being white basically carried a summary death sentence if you were on the wrong street, while all the while the media was telling me "you're white and you have it easy. You don't know what these poor unfortunate minorities go through." I didn't particularly care if this person or that one was black, but I did grow up acutely aware that the reciprocal was not always true, and I had precious little sympathy for anyone who tried to tell me I was some kind of cultural elite who owed something to the people who were shooting at me for the hardships they had suffered. My question was always "what hardships? I'm the one who has to watch every step he takes or word that he says."
The mentality which you summed up as the "honkies need to die" attitude was simply the way of the world, and it didn't matter who did what to cause it; all that mattered was I was the one who was going to die for it if I walked down the wrong street.
When I became a Corrections Officer later, and then a Patrolman, I encountered the same mentality over and over. More than half the homicides I was called to were cases of someone being shot on the grounds of "shoulda kept yo' white @** outta our hood." Executed after being found guilty of being white. I have a tough time buying the "the shooters must have had some kind of reason; it must have been retaliation for some kind of racial discrimination they experienced" line, especially given how many of the victims were children. What racially discriminatory act has a five year old girl committed that gives a 22 year old man legitimate grounds to shoot her? I don't see it, and no one else on the Force I served on (most of whom were black, by the way; the demographics of a Police Force tend to reflect the demographics of their jurisdiction) did either. We had families who lived in that neighborhood, and our job was to round up the ones who were making life dangerous for those families and lock them up, as my Chief always said, " 'til they get a prescription strength dose o' Get-Right in their system." To use your analogy, the boat was taking on water by gallons per second, and everyone with a badge was trying desperately to plug the holes, and far too many of us ended up being full of holes ourselves as a result.
With all that having been said, is it possible that I'm seeing a mentality (the rampant desire to kill anyone found, as I keep phrasing it, "guilty of being white") lurking in every nook and cranny that is actually rare? Possible, yes; but it doesn't look that "rare" to me. It seems to be all over the place. Is it possible that I'm reading into her ill-chosen words and seeing a message that wasn't intended? Possible, yes.
But from my experience with the world, what she said, sounds like what it sounds like. And at the end of the day, that's really all I have that I can go off of.

I can respect your story and life experience, when I wound up homeless at 16 I was in some rough places too and it’s never fun doing what you have to do, but you are assuming a billionaire philanthropist shares a common sentiment with literal thugs. She didn’t even specify white in there, but sure, she literally wants to kill all the old white people.

I just wonder why people had no problem with trumps I could shoot someone and not lose votes, but Oprah just wants octogenarian genocide. It smells like team mentality to me.

Trump's "I could shoot someone" was moronic. No lies. I facepalmed when that came out because I was fairly certain he had just handed the presidency to Hillary Clinton on a silver platter, and that was the point after which most of his supporters (myself included) couldn't make much of a case for him beyond "look dude, it's him or the other Clinton." I could point out that Trump said "someone," key word one, while Oprah is talking about an entire generation (with what I still assert is ethnocidal implications), but even I'll admit that's splitting some really fine semantic hairs, so I won't go there.
As for assuming Oprah Winfrey shares the mentality of those whom you accurately called "literal thugs," try an analogy for a moment.
Let's imagine you see some guy in a suit. Looks respectable enough. Nothing out of place. Even seems to have some class. Then you find out he's got a history of charity donations. Great guy!
And then he starts giving speeches about the kind of people he thinks are the source of problems in the world. He doesn't use the word Jew, but you can tell he's tapdancing around it, with phrases like "they all sit in their synagogues and plot this stuff" or "and they don't care because they'll be safe in Israel." Then he caps it off with "we had a chance to get rid of them back in the '30's and '40's."
Pretty obvious he's a Nazi, right?
Oh, but he never specifically said "Jews" tough.
Look. I can't prove someone's intention when they speak. All I have, all anyone has, is "I've heard this kind of talk from X person, Y person, and Z person. Ergo, this person talking is probably of mindset XYZ."
And here's Oprah making a speech that sounds an awful lot like Black Panther Party rhetoric. I'm seeing feathers and a bill and hearing a quack, so you can point out that there are no visible webbed feet, but I'm still saying "duck."

I’m impressed by the amount of assumptions you made from 5 seconds of audio. I’ll put a bounty out, whoever finds the whole BBC interview, I will pay you some SBD for it. I’m interested to know what all was actually said. It won’t change your assumptions, of that I can be sure, but this is like a guy in a big bird suit quacking, you can think it’s a duck all you want, it’s just a man someone dressed up in a big bird costume trying to convince you it’s a duck.

Nice post

I hear you tronthetechie,
I myself was born and raised in lily white neighborhoods of East Tennessee. And I know exactly what Oprah is talking about and referring to. I think the harshness she talks may have been taking out of context in this video.

But it's true. I'm middle aged and I'm one of the few who lives outside that W.A.S.P ( white anglo saxon protestants) bubble. Many are evangelical and they simply do not even care to understand anyone else outside this bubble. It's so normal to them and they honestly do not see anything wrong with believing like this. And when they come across anyone different whether it be a non-Christian or gay or anyone just "weird" to them..many times they totally shun them. Fortunately for me ,I got outside Tennessee and starting living in the "real world" and saw for myself there is more than just the white 1950 era lifestyle I was raised in.

I sometimes wish that more people could have “out of body experiences” nothing drives home how superficial our differences are than realizing that your body is just a “shell” so to speak.

Glad you could see some more of the world. No matter where you are, everyone should roam a little.

THANK YOU

[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmf6xodfcvNiEpyh61Xu8c2AtBoT742NJ9J88wqLDfuUGm/image.png]

https://i.imgur.com/KsZOAaD.gif

She's so classy.

Our current piece of crap "President" has said far worse. Remember, he thinks it is perfectly normal to sexually assault women?!

Did she ment the femnazi-faggot-polcorrect-nigger-loving generation?

good post.. upvote @azizabdi

Oprah can be crazy sometimes like us. That's normal I guess.

Your work shocks the world of steemit, incredible. !!

good post

No matter what we do, they have all the power. Sounds negative, but thats the fact. We have to live with it. The only way to get rid of this, is to get into spirituality, leave money and all the monitary things & go to the himalayas..

She knows how to get in spotlight of the media and she gets attention of media by doing so.

When someone asks me how I take my coffee, I always respond that I like it "Oprah" because I want it to be black and powerful.

Very good blog

Excellent post!

How about a school teacher, a scientist, or a policy scholar next time around. No more well connected and out of touch millionaires or billionaires who get into politics to take more corperate cash.

sheknew

Thats true :D Nice video man

President Oprah is a nightmare! lol

I hope she actually runs. She will be completely and utterly destroyed!

I'm watching the news now about this. This is absurd and the media is loving this. Any chance they can mock the American people after last year's election they will take it!

I think Oprah would make a very interesting president. At this point, I don't mind who is president.

博文很有内容啊

I am not scared.
then again I don't really get scared often.

I listened to a black friend of mine today for perspective say something close to "OP needs to run for mayor or a state seat before getting into asking to be the president without experience. We can't just set the precedent that every rich famous person can turn around and decide they want to be president whenever they want. We need standards as a country". It was nice to hear some logic from somebody with a dog in the fight.

The pictures speak volumes. Censorship on FB? No way! Remind me one more time, why do we need FB? And when do we give Kissinger a Nobel Peace Prize? Oh, wait, that already happened in 1973.

Seems like she loves herself some Harvey

A wonderful post. Keep it up

You gonna get foodstamps… You gonna get foodstamps… You gonna get foodstamps… EVERYBODYYYYYYYYYYY gonnnnnnaaaaaa get fooooooodstaaaaaammmmmpppppsssss!!!!!!!

That sad moment when there's strong reason to vote Trump.

Always a fan. Keep up the good work Luke.

Nice post, thanks for sharing

Very good 👍

Follow me for follback

Thank you. I so must record and upload my video update. If I don't have time can you look at Netflix and see how some shows are Bernie Sanders and Libertarian???

Be the change!

Nice to see you back Luke, you were missed. :)

She's not gonna run...she's too busy with her other career stuff.

Awesome post. Thanks for sharing.

The MSM is about to really start pushing Oprah 2020 I bet.. Seems like she might be the globalists answer to Trump.

Great post

Why do you share some pictures of crazy moments?

You are spot on regarding overspending on war.

Thanks for research.

i am loving it she is not scary at all

Wel. come. back. We. Missed. You. Don't. leave. us. again...
https://merrymerryquitecontrary.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/children-of-the-corn.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/88/4f/bc/884fbc09f1b25a4fe9baea61385c5d65.jpg

lol Nice. :)

I think she'd be great for negotiations. Excellent social skills and super smart. Who knows, I wouldn't be opposed to the idea...

On Iran... they just picked up the manual that got the thing done in 1953 and tried to play it again. Who would have thought that it would not work this one time??? I'm shocked, shocked I tell ya!

I'm leaving YouTube for dtube right now!!!!!

she has always scared me

Do you guys think she should run for the precidency🇺🇸?

Thanks for the great information. @lukewearechange

splendid post !!

The left idiocracy after the right idiocracy, exactly what everyone "needs". Oprah for sure is going to come up with something genius like exiling all white people to space to reflect sun light in order to reduce the climate change.

Aaaand welcome back:)

We have finally reached the point where from now on US precidency will be over runned by celebrities.

without even knowing what oprah's political oppinions are, I can say for sure that she will get a ton of votes only because she is famous.

welcome to the new America, ruled by the rich and famous.

Sorry to tell you, celebs and rich have run for president for much longer than NOW. Remember Ronnie?

im well aware, but the type of celebs theese days are far more worse than before

Ronnie was pretty bad. He used to SNITCH for the FBI while in hollywood. This was during the red scare.

lol no one will vote for her

but you are commenting her @markjackson :p

Don't be too sure about that

Trump2020

like You think no one will for me😁

This. I think the next election will see old school politicians doing well as people tire of celebrities and TV personalities.

I really hope our presidency doesn't continue to devolve into a Hollywood battle of who's who celebrities.

kissing some one wasn't that easy :p

@lukewearechange Good luck !!! The Rock all time Hero. Great post !!!

nice.. really nice

The post is very amazing, very menginfirasi begi we all stemian ,, guide us so we can like you .. regards steemit

whosoever run for the presidency. i wish american will choose the one who bring peace and harmony to the world

Although peace and harmony are nice Hallmark card slogans, the USA ain't responsible for the world. We just can't be. We've over extended ourselves with various wars to create peace -- a peace we want, monroe doctrine, no commies, you know that stuff. The USA sides with certain alies and fights against certain foes. For example, USA is not keen on other nations that do human rights abuses. And if some nation is doing that stuff, sometimes USA gets pissed off and goes and drops bombs on those assholes. And so it goes. If we elected a president that had the policy that, no matter what, peace and harmony, our foes would probe, and test, and exploit, and tread on the unprotected around the world. Lets say your in a nice neiborhood and some gang bangers move next door, start selling drugs, start having scary dangerous parties, with big guys with weapons. Sure, you could try to go over there and reason with them, but if THEY don't want peace, because they enjoy sex and violence, then your going to have a problem. Its gonna take some major wake up event for humanity not to hurt each other. Ronald Reagan talked about Alien invasion at the U.N., and how something like that would bring us all together. Human beings need to all feel they are on the same side against a BIGGER challange. Only then will we get on the same page -- but even that won't be peace and harmony.

Great Post!. Interesting Story. I want more of this. Keep it up

Interesting video. Oprah was something else.

Interesting perspective

It seems we're moving into a post-politician political scene where you have to be famous to even consider running; Oprah 2020, Dwayne 2020, Zuckerberg 2020

If we have reached the point where celebrity appeal, rather than executive experience, is the path to the presidency... then God help us all.
Obama had no executive experience, and only four years of national level experience.
Trump had NO political experience, but at least had experience wielding executive power.
Reagan, long before them, did BEGIN as an actor, but at least he governed a state before climbing to the presidency.
But actors and talk show hosts with no experience?
That will be the day when it will be time to return to something closer to the original Constitution, where the only ones elected by the populace were the members of the House of Reps and the State Governors, and the Governors and Reps chose all the rest, just to put a layer in between the elected offices and the increasingly-apparent-in-their-incapacity-to-choose-their-leaders populace.

You seem a little biased to me.

You disregard the experience Obama had (State-level governance since 92, and Senator since 04) as being too little, but give Trump credit for having "Excecutive experience" (was born rich), which somehow makes him qualified.

Then you go on to say that Reagan at least "governed a state", which is exactly what Obama did.

No. He was a State Senator, not a governor. That's not executive experience. It's legislative. Also, during his four years of national legislative experience to vote "present" the vast majority of the time (votes in the Legislative Branch are public information, look it up). That's not very decisive. That's not "disregarding his experience," it's fact. Any CEO or State governor, or even a mayor, is required by the very nature of their position to be decisive (the root word of "executive" is "execute" or "carry out"), meaning the least influential mayor of the tiniest town in America has more executive experience after a day in office than a four year senator has accumulated by the end of their term.
Also, the executive experience I was giving Trump credit for was management of an international corporation with a list of employees larger than the executive branch, where decisions affect entire cities. Nothing compared to the presidency, but it's an executive role, where Obama's entire political career prior to the presidency was legislative, which is nothing more than debating inside a chamber where the effects of the decisions being made are far, far removed from the eyes of any of the ones making them. Legislation is nothing (and I mean nothing but nothing) more than discussing. It's talk. That is the sum total of a legislator's job: to conjure persuasive rhetoric that will make other legislators (or their constituents, who hold the keys to their continued employment) think one is morally or logically right. Actually being right is optional.
The traits necessary for success in a national, corporate, or even municipal executive post have more in common with each other than the traits necessary for success in a national executive post and a national legislative post (and that's discounting the fact that his legislative career was lackluster, being famous mostly for being outraged at George W. Bush for doing things he himself would later insist he had executive prerogative to do).
My loathing of Barack Obama comes from seeing my family's homeland (the Philippines) thrown under the bus repeatedly by Obama so that he could score popularity points with the EU by saying "see? I stood up to eeeeevil little Duterte. How dare he actually get tough on those poor misunderstood drug cartels? He's supposed to respect their basic Human Right to make life a living hell for a nation of 100 million." My loathing of Barack Obama comes from how his moronic decision in that regard nearly cost me the ability to ever see the aforementioned family again by, pushing the Philippines to the brink of aligning with China instead. My loathing of Barack Obama comes from watching four of my fellow officers die under the guns of rioters he himself encouraged on national TV. It doesn't stem from "bias" any more than the average Westerner's loathing of Hitler does. It stems from the undeniable and absolute fact that he was an abject failure in his role, and the suffering he brought about is beyond my ability to even put into a post.
Trump... well, he's restored the alliance with the Philippines to a significantly warmer level. On everything else, there's time left to see.
In short, the "anyone who fails to prostrate themselves before St. Barack or fails to emit streams of invective at the mention of Darth Donald must be biased" angle, which you just manifested by being shocked and upset that I didn't laud and praise that psychopath (who was so narcissistic that not only was his entire presidency about nothing more than making a monument to himself, but he even had the gall to say that outright and expect his followers to agree with it, with his little "I will take it as a personal insult if you don't vote for Clinton" speech) doesn't make a point for you. It merely reveals your own bias, manifested by a belief that anything giving your opposition any validity must be inherently flawed.

Uww nice post i like read your post

Great to see you again Luke! I always enjoy your coverage.

Interesting stuff, thank you for this!

:D :D

My take ...

please upvote my comment

great

Great!

Support him or not, Trump has definitely created a new trend of EVERYONE running for presidency, despite their lack of experience of competence.

Gonna watch out

Nice!

This will never happen. Although I did find joy in the fact that Spicer said Oprah has no political experience to run for president.

"no one will vote for her". I still remember how people said no one will vote for Trump......

your post is very very good 😘😘 @lukewearechange

This is really great and i believe its gonna change things

Oprah Winfrey's speech was really something. As I was watching a TV channel, a news Caster compared it to the Obama's kind of speech.

Any way if she wanted to contest for President, it's up to her.

I cannot give anything to you, I can only say thank you. May your goodness get the best reward from the God

Very well done Luke, I think Oprah would be a great pick for Henry and those boys,
This is gone beyond a reality show...into cartoon land.

Great post @lukewearechange I wish you will support me thank you

@lukewearechange you do great work, been following you for years brother glad to have you around here on this Blockchain.

excellent your post very successful I will see your blog

This has to be a joke. If she becomes president of the USA even living in Canada is to close. I'd be moving to the other side of the earth to avoid catching liberalism.

nice piece man..ENJOYED EVERY READING

Great job 👍

USA went to the dogs with Obama. Oprah will be a disaster. Imagine Oprah vs Putin. He will chew her up and spit her out.

Luke & my brother are twins. Ophra???

nice picture 😎

Yea that video with her saying they have to die was a little misleading. She could have choose a better way to say it but I think she was trying to say that old racist people had to pass on so they can't indoctrante the next generation.

Good post, crazy content :S

All I know is that Trump is a racist demented FUCK that will in the long run make our world better, because the human race will never allow this again. If we are so fortunate to have Oprah as president, it sure as hell beats a person who calls the 2nd most insane person in the world (Trump being first) "Rocket Man" and says both sides of the street in Charleston had good people, while one side was all KKK.

[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmT1mdrmjCxEysYefB9YVXemd2WNM3tNWkwhqB5KBbtQXU/wordpress-Oprah-Getty53374174.jpg]

this is a very beautiful all images and boss.
i want to be friends with you?

great job

hi..kindly follow and upvote me i will upvote and follow you back.

Hollywood is a fucking joke!

Great Post!. Interesting Story.

Great post! What in the world are we going to do?!

Fighting their billionaire with our billionaire is the kind of strategy that will only benefit the billionaires.

finally a voice of reason and sanity on STEEM!
Sometimes I feel like there is just lunatics!
Thank you for this post! keep up the great work!

Oprah has said nothing about running BTW.

Just for put a post with a video WOW how get to many votes.!?
i want like you when i grow up amaizing

nice post i relay like it

To intimate that Oprah is endorsing eugenics is quite irresponsible. That you can take a few seconds out of a long speech and make such assertions speaks to someone who really is trying to do something other than inform people.

Having watched the entire interview, I can state categorically that all she was saying was that many racists will not change and we can only get rid of their racism when they die. That is the point she was making. I would suggest that you do a new post and critically analyze the speech instead of making these inflammatory statements. SHAME.

I am yet to hear Oprah say that she is endorsing these things you mentioned. Let me be frank, I think it would be a tragedy for her to get caught up in the filth of US politics. She has absolutely nothing to gain from it. Plus, she does not need it.

PLUS SHE HAS NOT SAID SHE IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT OR EVEN CARES TO.

Also, I am not following your logic because you start out with Oprah, then you move into geopolitics and even then you touched on a number of things without being grounded in anything in particular. What are the parallels here between the things you mentioned and Oprah? Maybe that was not your intention, but the headline really set us up for it. If you are going to criticize Oprah, do so, but you sir, are all over the place. And that eugenics statement, which I assume you are tying her to, is bothersome.

All the woman did was give a speech encouraging people. My gosh, is the country so divided that even the best of intentions are turned on their head, and sullied and stained to appease people who are reaching for all the negativity they can scrape? Again, SHAME.

great blog

Pure click-bait, a two second excerpt from the original Oprah speech is not enough to start a rant for, also the majority of this video is about America's meddling in Iran and the hypocrisy of Hollywood.

I've watched the whole original speech from Oprah and that's not what she's going for at all. Yes what she said is inflammatory to the older generation, but she has not incited nor implied that anybody should die. She was simply stating that the voices of racists and hatemongers alike will continue to exist in American society until they are dead.

Hoooo this smelllsss so bad huffff

Regarding a split between Zionists and White Nationalists in the White House, for those who have a more comprehensive understanding, the Zionists do seem to have undue influence in America given their small numbers (3%) of the American population. I have heard it said that America is just a colony of Israel. Although I do not believe that it is at that point yet, I do believe a better balance needs to be struck. It will never be accomplished by political fights. It will be accomplished by expressing gratitude and unconditional love for all things and intentionalizing those thoughts into the oneness.

Please note - Although I still would not vote/support for Oprah Winfrey to become the next US President, the eugenics thing is just over the top and about as crazy as Trump dropping a nuke on North Korea. Calm the hell down, none of that is going to happen.

What began as a hashtag — #Oprah2020 — and a few jokes on Twitter has escalated to full-blown theorizing of Oprah Winfrey’s chances of landing in the Oval Office.

After Winfrey’s powerful speech at the 2018 Golden Globes on Sunday, even President Donald Trump weighed in on the prospect, and his daughter, Ivanka, tried to ride the Oprah wave. An idea that a couple of years ago would have seemed all but impossible now has plenty of political observers asking: Why not?

Oprah certainly possesses a level of star power that rivals, even surpasses, Trump’s. She has wide name recognition and is well-liked, especially among coalitions important to Democrats — women, African Americans. Some, however, are already begging Winfrey not to run. America shouldn’t be a place where celebrity is a prerequisite for politics, they say, and we don’t need another political novice in the White House.

Responding to the buzz, President Trump on Tuesday said Winfrey’s hypothetical campaign would be “lots of fun.” “I did one of her last shows. ... I like Oprah. I don’t think she’s going to run,” he said.

At least some in the political world seem to be taking the Oprah 2020 idea seriously — showing just how much Trump’s election has rewritten the rules of celebrities in politics. Oprah proved in 2008 that she has plenty of political power; her Golden Globes speech has sparked debate about how she should use it.

Oprah delivered one heck of a speech
“I want all the girls watching here, now, to know that a new day is on the horizon!” Winfrey declared while accepting the Golden Globes’ Cecil B. DeMille Award for career achievement on Sunday. (You can read the full transcript of the speech on Vox.) While there has long been mild speculation that she might harbor political aspirations, the nearly 10-minute speech brought those whispers to a roar.

Oprah opened her address describing a scene of herself sitting on the linoleum floor of her mother’s house in Milwaukee as a child in 1964, watching Sidney Poitier become the first black man to win the Oscar for best actor.

“I tried many, many times to explain what a moment like that means to a little girl, a kid watching from the cheap seats as my mom came through the door bone-tired from cleaning other people’s houses,” she said. Poitier in 1982 received the same Cecil B. DeMille Award that Winfrey was given on Sunday.

“It is not lost on me that at this moment, there are some little girls watching as I become the first black woman to be given the same award,” she said.

Oprah, a talk show host, actress, producer, philanthropist, and all-around media heavyweight, spoke of her own career achievements but also placed herself in a historical context of race and class and the current context of gender and women’s rights. She recounted the story of civil rights hero Recy Taylor, who died just days before the awards show, and emphasized the pervasiveness of gender bias in Hollywood and all walks of life.

“When that new day finally dawns, it will be because a lot of magnificent women, many of whom are right here in this room tonight, and some pretty phenomenal men, fighting hard to make sure that they become the leaders who take us to the time when nobody ever has to say, ‘Me too,’ again,” she closed.

Soon after her speech, NBC fired off an eyebrow-raising tweet reading, “Nothing but respect for OUR future president.”
Source - https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/1/9/16868252/oprah-2020-president-explained

Amazing Image! I loved it , Thank You so much for sharing the beauty.
Thank you and great!

we will see

That's all we need is another elite actor with pedophile friends to run for president.

Great article and real story from oprah

OprahForPresident

https://steemit.com/oprah/@czarcasm/oprah-for-presidency

who else remembers when oprah did the below show about penises
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/youtubepoop/images/c/c4/Images9000.jpeg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/216?cb=20111030052128

Rome is falling. If Oprah runs, she will win. We're in a very sick time and it's going to end very, very badly.

I know I'll never fully understand the situation, but if I were a rich person, here's how I'd be thinking.

"Let's get rid of all the useless people and replace them with as many robots as possible."

I think once the rich have access to a robot that can get into your home, overpower you and kill your family, we're all dead.

Human beings are very, very deadly creatures, if they have the power to kill without consequence they will... Like it's nothing.

Be very afraid.

She is the worst, celebrities should not be in politics!

Ahah, it makes me funny, thanks!)

In 2020, steem price will be increase further! I think!

Anyone running on the Demoncrat ticket scares me!

Kissinger kissed comments.

nice post

great...

In my own opinion, I think this is about publicity and nothing more. Not that Oprah needs it but WTF, let the rich get richer while we all sit back and fuel the fire.

I personally doubt that she would step into the world of politics and automatically have half of the country hate her. I think she is used to being a well-liked public figure, and I have no issue with her. But if she were to move into politics, the progressive ideology that she subscribes to would make her a real threat to the well-being of this country. She also would have to worry about skeletons coming out of the closet, as they inevitably do when entering the world of politics. I believe that she would have a good chance of winning, but of course this depends on how well Trump does in the next few years, and what the economy looks like at that point. Hopefully she doesn't run.

To be a president is no joke. I know she knows that and considers that before making her decision.

Great Post! @lukewearechange

Love your youtube channel. It's nice to hear some real truth for a change. To bad Alex Jones is such a puppet now. I'll have to sneak into bohemian grove this year and expose him hanging out with Trump there lol... Glad to join this site. Lots of great people and info. Keep fighting the good fight.

Yup, the disinformation game is strong. Platforms like this will balance the scales instead of 6 companies providing news we have hundreds of sources. Glad to be a part of it, still a green horn but I look forward to growing with steemit along side you guys

People still buy that Bohemian Grove stunt?
Jones obviously had permission to be there, only filmed what he was supposed to and had been the gate keeper ever since.
The camera man he took named Mike Hanson works for Time Warner and took great pains to hide that fact.

Thank god for the free media.

It is interesting concept to explore however the information which are available to the public can be extremely subjective and far away from the reality. If this would be the case Oprah has a chance to make a big impact as she is already very popular and influential...

Nice

Lol just to goes to show that American Politics is just full of Actors . Thats quite a few people who have been a position of power who are either in the film industry or have family members who owns the industry .

Nice work.

https://steemit.com/photography/@amazingarmaan/introduction

I am not really frightened by the enthusiasm of her message but I am certainly not seeing the use of this in the long term as this is very denigrating to the real feminists that have achieved so much. Her message has the potential to spark a turn in the fight for equality and not in a good way. The world has never been as equal as it is now...

Oprah 2020 can be a saviour, Check this story -
https://steemit.com/news/@rupakcr/why-people-love-oprah-2020-the-woman-who-inspired

very good post thanks :)

Interesting content. I'm going to try and find Operah's speach. I keep seeing everywhere that she announced her running for president but I heard somewhere else that she never even said that. Gotta do my own research.

Henry Kissinger is part of the bilderberg group or devil group

Keep at it @lukewearechange Awesome stuff!

Glad you're back at at Luke. You were missed. And I am with you, the idea of Oprah 2020, is absolutely horrifying.

Congratulations @lukewearechange!
Your post was mentioned in the hit parade in the following categories:

• Comments - Ranked 5 with 225 comments
• Pending payout - Ranked 2 with $ 979,92

Great story! Well deserve to be upvoted!

LOL, yeah this really would be crazy! Oprah 2020, hahaha!! But after Trump...nothing is impossible anymore.

lol! This is why you got Trump for president. When are you gonna learn, celebrities are not politicians!

Rock The VOTE!

[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmRd1TWygjXtoBkm3fiGBsPvsBDTBtEp1R9B5XzUwx75Yo/dwayne-johnson-the-rock-president-2020.jpg]

Very Good... https://steemit.com/steemit/@alexalpmarket/hello-to-all-my-friends-of-steemit-youtobe-vs-dtube

la elite illuminatti

Governments are making the world unstable , why allow any person to rule if this is the result .

There is zero chance Oprah gets the Dem nomination. Yeah, they like her when she gives a nice speech or two, but when it comes to playing legit ball, she'd get creamed based on her history and a lack of extensive political knowledge. Dems aren't like Repubs in that they'll nominate any idiot celebrity. On the other hand, Repubs would never nominate a black woman. Ergo, no President Winfrey.

Oprah running for President may be a form of distraction, she does have a lot vested from her years in the industry. It does not mean she is really qualified for what it entails, but money speaks. It goes to show who really runs the Country...Although, a lot is coming out about her as you mentioned with those people she has been involved in. A veil is lifting and the light will be shining to expose all of the darkness.

On the matters of WW3...this has been in the process for years. It is, unfortunately, a stage that has been set. Have you ever read Albert Pike's description of the Three World Wars?
>The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.

We all have been witnessing this coming to fruition. They have set this ball in motion way before any of us reading this were born. It is unfortunately inevitable.

I guess Paula Dean will be Oprah's first eugenic elimination to make an example to the plebeians hordes.

I guess Paula Dean will be the first of Oprah's eugenics elimination as an example for the plebeian hordes.

I do not think the Left side understands that their parties run is to globalism. What does that mean well there is 3 things that need to be done before that happens.

(1) A global currency -- Already in the works.

(2) A global equality --- Be ready to live at about 25% of what you are now so the rest can also. Except the ones already wealthy, all are not safe either unless graced by the UN

(3) Global religion - Otherwise there will always be fighting, guess what religion?

Remember once globalized its a reset, all laws and rules are decided by census of all the global leader and seeing as how the largest % are socialist sooooo....

The democratic party nor the republican party give you anything, they use the power of the peoples taxes and debt to give you all the nice things, they on their own give you nothing. But leave office millionaires. Why are they the hero's and not the working class that pay for it all.

Be weary of the attack on the family values, look at the birth to death ratio of the EU and you will see why emigrants are so much a part of their agenda. And are willing to make their people pay to put up emigrants that are willing to have 5+ children who has stronger values on at least family.

Most of the EU has a 1.3 birth rate to 2 death rate. At least a 2 to 2.8 is needed to stay afloat. I do not think you want that in the US, if not a return to family values is necessary. If we do not they will bring in people that are, and the ones that are here will pay for it until they decide to stop working and take care of themselves until it crashes.

Digital Detox is going to trend in the next few years. I’m personally looking into a faraday cage to be able to go sit in and get a way from all the frequencies. Love your updates.

Our world is insane at this point

Yeah, Oprah vs Michelle Obama vs Trump in 2020

Wow. How did it get to the point where television hosts are the cream of the crop for leading the nation. What happened to statesmen, economists and such people. The election process should be about policy not personality.

At any rate, sounds like once again the DemoRats have selected their candidate without regard for the primaries or the peoples vote.

THAT'S GREAT

Dtube Owners interview. Don't miss it.

Very interesting! This looks very promising.

I upvoted your post plz
Please upvote my these posts, I will be very thankful to you.
https://steemit.com/funny/@nouranga/hasb-e-hall-6

https://steemit.com/funny/@nouranga/hasb-e-hall-7

https://steemit.com/funny/@nouranga/hasb-e-hall-8

https://steemit.com/funny/@nouranga/hasb-e-hall-9

https://steemit.com/funny/@nouranga/hasb-e-hall-10

https://steemit.com/funny/@nouranga/hasb-e-hall-11

[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmRKgYYp1TzWmvqtnfbMSLZQSgUXinUxqyHyd39HZ8j7gx/DQmRKgYYp1TzWmvqtnfbMSLZQSgUXinUxqyHyd39HZ8j7gx.gif]

YouTube is going to get crushed.
A year or two from now it will be nothing but barfed up Buzzfeed vids.

Whats Next, Kanye West 2020, Mark Zuckerberg 2020

Oh wait.......

Yes I saw the Oprah golden globes speech which was particularly spooky & all the woman dressed in black etc. Personally I don't trust these billionaires with their humanitarian sales pitches.
💩
Did you know Oprah has Zulu (Tribe in South Africa) DNA?🧀
Nice work Luke🤠

A new world order will commence in 2020