The colors of those graphs are trippy.

And not that great tbh. They don't work together

not my favorite colors either and I wouldn't have used them personally. The doctor that ran and wrote the study chose them.

Should have hired a designer :P

You are absolutely right! Vaccination is a scam so Big Pharma can take your money and makes you more sick. Upvoted and resteemed.

Thank you @foxdal

That says it all right there. Plain as day.

If individuals choose not to see common sense, that's their problem.

It becomes my problem pretty fast though, when they want to force vaccines on me and my family. Thanks for speaking out @steemtruth, it helps!

I couldn't agree more about forced vaccines @lyndsaybowes. It's disgraceful and another example of governments believing they own us. Our bodies, our choice. Thanks for commenting.

Why don't we mandate
Peanuts
Eggs
Wheat
Soy
Shell fish and
Penicillin!

We cannot !

But we can mandate toxic filthy
Contaminated vaccines?

IF ANYTHING IS Mandatory
It should be
MANDATORY VITAMINS and MINERALS!?
No deaths in 31 years !!

http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v11n01.shtml

With over 60 billion doses of vitamin and mineral supplements used per year in the USA Not one Death.

Mandatory Vaccines?
60 billions doses ?!?
SIDS
Infertility
Crohns
Parkinson's
Seizures
Juvenile-Onset (Type-1) Diabetes
Obesity
Asthma
Guillain-Barre syndrome
Autism
AIDS
MS
Neurological Disorders
Atypical Measles
Lupus
Encephalitis
Intussusception
Mycoplasma infected
“paralytic polio.”
Viral or aseptic meningitis
SV40
Leukemia
"Cancer"
Thousands of different ADR's
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2013/10/19/revelations-by-shawn-siegel/#.dpuf

Chicken pox?
Measles?
Mumps?
Flu?
Don't sound so bad now right?
Vitamins and Minerals sound even better right?

truthtrain

nutritionfirst

Here HERE!

Crazy that people think health comes from laboratories!

We have nutritional deficiencies from nature not drug deficiencies from science.

Oh but todd I'm a Doctor I went to school to get a license to practice medicine. Oh yeah
People went to school to get a license to practice driving! Does that mean they are all good drivers ?

Rockefeller funded drug thug puppets !

I'm following back and I'm sharing the content of followers organically. My account for following back is:@followback

Geri Takibe Geri Takip Yapıyorum ve takip edenlerin içeriklerini, organik olarak paylaşıyorum. Geri Takip İçin Hesabım: @followback

@steemtruth
Nice !!
Prevent Diseases?!

Prevent these!
Toxemia!
Deficiencies!
Abuse and neglect the body receives from poor eating habits and lifestyles!
A weakened body!
Oxidative stress!
Inflammation!
Mitochondrial dysfunction!

Tell me if drugs / vaccines prevent these that cause diseases?
Body pollution from wrong diet and neglect of natural living principles is the cause of disease.
"Inoculation means introducing into the body certain products of disease through the skin of a healthy person, so giving "built-in" resistance to the disease."

Do Medical Doctors know the difference between cause and effect?

Cow pus eradicated small pox? We will call the pus the virus.(poison).

Cancer is the result of the cause. For example, radiation causes cancer. Chemotherapy causes cancer. Smoking causes cancer, etc. What caused the cow to have pimples on its teats is any bodies guess, but the pimples didn't cause themselves. There was a cause.

To take the result of a disease and claim it will prevent disease was and is absurd.

Eat cookies , cakes, pizza and drink pop EVERYDAY FOR WEEKS.Eventually you will get pimples - pus And we will call the pus a virus (poison) I'm going to collect all that pus and inject into people to try and prevent pimples ?! Or should we prevent pimples by eating better?

Think about it!

Did the pimples cause themselves? Of course not. The cause was the food eaten. The result was the body trying to eliminate the poison created by the bad food.

This is why doctors treat symptoms. They don’t understand cause and don’t know the difference between cause and effect.

How can inoculations be given for neglect the body receives?
How can you vaccinate a body against abuse?
How can you be immunized against bad diet and insufficient vitamins and minerals?
It can't be done.
The allopathic medical establishment is looking into test tubes for answers.

Naturopaths feel that microbe death is at the expense of poisoning the body with the drugs or vaccines. Poison on top of poison fails to get at the root cause of all illness, which is "polluted body" or systemic toxemia.

Get rid of the flies or the garbage?

Do you poison the dirty fish tank water or clean the fish tank?

Do mosquitoes make the water stagnant or are mosquitoes attracted to stagnant water?

Don't give the the Antibody BULL!!
There is more to the immune system than antibodies.
Science and their assumptions,
All that the presence of antibodies in a person means is that the person has come into contact with a particular pathogen, it does not mean that they have immunity.
Antibodies are just ONE part of the immune system

Good Luck with that.

truthtrain

Abnormal thinking
Abnormal pathogen
Abnormal route
Abnormal immune response
Abnormal results
Abnormal look on your face

Ischemic stroke!

Upvoted

I have tons of information ever need any hit me up .

@steemtruth
Here is more examples

Vaccines did NOT save us !!

Child Health Safety has compiled an excellent report on data the drug industry do not want you to see. Here are two centuries of UK, USA and Australian official death statistics which show conclusively and scientifically that modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies.

The main advances in combating disease over 200 years have been better food and clean drinking water. Improved sanitation, less overcrowded and better living conditions also contribute. This is also borne out in published peer reviewed research:

http://mobile.dudamobile.com/site/preventdisease?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpreventdisease.com%2Fnews%2F10%2F102510_vaccines_did_not_save_us.shtml&utm_referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fhfn.org%2Funvaccinated-children-will-be-healthiest-among-future-generations-studies-and-surveys-predict%2F#2845

More graphs
http://www.vaclib.org/sites/debate/Vaccines.html

The only way to eradicate paralytic poliomyelitis is to STOP VACCINATING!!!

Dr Viera Scheibner (PhD)

http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2398/rr/578260

In developing countries, polio is blamed on poor sanitation. But in the United States, polio was blamed on lack of immunity due to good sanitation!

LOOK AT THESE GRAPHS

http://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/pesticides-and-polio-a-critique-of-scientific-literature/

"The greatest threat of childhood diseases lies in the dangerous and ineffectual efforts made to prevent them through mass immunization..... There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease."
--- Dr Robert Mendelsohn, M.D.

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/decline1.html

Graph showing disease decline (Australia) before introduction of vaccines

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/graph.html

Figures one (1) through eleven (11) graphically illustrate that in North America, Europe, and the South Pacific , major declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance of public immunization efforts for specific diseases as listed. This provides irrefutable evidence that vaccines are not necessary for the effective elimination of a wide range of infectious diseases
Figures eleven (12) through twenty-four (24) graphically illustrate that immunization is not by any means a proven and foolproof measure for protection from various infectious disease conditions. It is often inconsequential epidemiologically, and in some cases it is shown to actually worsen health-care outcomes.

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/ImmunizationGraphs-RO2009.pdf

"The medical historians of our century... agree that the decline of the epidemics which had wrought havoc in the Middle Ages was not due to the introduction of vaccination, but of hygiene, for they had diminished long before large-scale inoculations had begun..." Hans Ruesch, 'History of Medicine', Slaughter of the Innocent, CIVIS, 1991, p.194

http://medicinekillsmillions.com/articles/truth-about-decline-of-the-infectious-diseases.html

truthtrain

Having better food, clean water, better medical technology and proper hygiene have decreased infection rates and mortality rates astronomically.

However it seems like a logical fallacy to take that fact, then assume that because the rates were already in decline, any newly introduced treatment method must be ineffective. It's sort of like saying cars don't need airbags because they have seat-belts.

There have been small regional outbreaks of measles and other diseases that are mostly eradicated. Overwhelmingly those outbreaks have occurred in non-immunized populations.

Example
> In March 2014, a measles outbreak was reported in the United States after two unvaccinated Amish men had returned to their U.S. communities from the Philippines, where they had been unknowingly infected with measles while performing typhoon relief work. In this article, we describe the epidemiology of the outbreak in this distinctive unvaccinated population and detail the containment efforts instituted by local health departments to limit the spread of the disease.

Most notably, 89% (340 of 383) of the cases of measles infection in this outbreak were in unvaccinated individuals. This seems like evidence that points to the fact that vaccines are working, despite the fact that improvements in nutrition, hygiene and quality of life have had a bigger impact on the rates of infection.

Are there dangers to vaccination? Absolutely - And those side-effects shouldn't be ignored! Research should take place to look into these rare, but serious dangers, and the vaccinations should be modified to reduce these risks!

In my opinion the risk of catching a serious infection far outweighs the risk of side-effects from a vaccination, but I can see how people who have been affected by these serious side-effects of vaccinations might think differently on the subject.

You have to balance the benefits against the risks. That's how you make decisions in medicine.

The point of this article is that deaths from these various diseases had already dropped drastically prior to the introduction of vaccination.

What you don't do with this information is say that vaccines don't work. What you instead do with this information is say that because the risk of mortality from these diseases is now much lower, there is much less reason to use a vaccine to protect against it.

If there is an illness that has, for example, a 50% mortality rate, and a vaccine that runs a 5% chance of a serious, life threatening reaction, then if the disease is very prevalent and the risk of catching it is high, then it makes sense to get the vaccine even given the chance of a bad and possibly dangerous reaction to the vaccine. But if the mortality rate of the disease is 1%, then I'm not at all sure it makes sense to take a 5% risk of a life threatening reaction in order to avoid a 1% risk of mortality, because you'd kill a lot more people with the vaccine than you would if you just let the illness run its course through the society.

How many measles deaths have there been in the US in the last 10 years? Zero. How many deaths from the measles vaccine? 108 according to VAERS.

Given the remarkably low mortality rates for all the above listed illnesses, essentially zero, and given that these low rates were achieved mostly by improvements in sanitation and nutrition -- the vaccines that protect against them had darned well better be no more dangerous than water. Otherwise it makes no sense to use them.

To discuss the 2014 Amish measles outbreak you mentioned, how many deaths were there? Zero. How many people over age 55 got measles in this outbreak in the Amish community? Zero.

Why? Because those people acquired natural immunity from catching the disease prior to the introduction of vaccines, and the immunity is lifelong.

Thus there are two ways to go at protecting a community. One is to allow our immune systems to learn. The other is to try to trick them with vaccines.

Unbiased and honest inquiry into the possibility that vaccines have side effects, that tricking the immune system might have consequences, that injecting proteins directly into the bloodstream to stimulate immunity is not normal or physiologic and might have serious consequences -- these are the questions that our medical system ought to be asking itself. We should be asking if the explosion of food allergies is a result of injecting proteins into the bloodstream.

But, because Pharma makes a killing off of vaccines, and because Pharma and regulatory agencies and the elected officials who fund the regulatory agencies and receive campaign donations from Pharma (a situation called an Iron Triangle) all want to stifle discussion and let the money making continue, we cannot have these discussions that should be had. Instead, the discussions can only happen on the fringes amongst people who don't feel compelled to practice the religion of salvation through blind adherence to bureaucratic protocol.

>Unbiased and honest inquiry into the possibility that vaccines have side effects

I couldn't agree more. This is very much needed.

>if the disease is very prevalent and the risk of catching it is high, then it makes sense to get the vaccine even given the chance of a bad and possibly dangerous reaction to the vaccine.

The risks of catching these diseases are low, in part because of herd immunity. With 85 percent plus of the population being vaccinated, these diseases have become far less prevalent, and in cases where infection occurs, it's unlikely to make it through more than a few people before stopping. Taking away that herd immunity would make these diseases more prevalent and the benefits of vaccination might outweigh the complications. I'd be interested in learning more about the rates of complications from vaccines vs the rates of death/complications from infection by the diseases themselves.

Edit:
World Health Organization stats on vaccine complication rates. I'll come back to this for a thorough analysis once I have more time.

Herd immunity ? You mean a measles party ?

Since when are so many people scared of benign microbes ?

Fever and a rash

• 25 percent chance of hospitalization
• 0.1-0.2 percent chance of death.
• 0.1 percent chance of encephalitis (brain swelling) which can lead to serious complications or death
• Chance of other serious complications such as secondary viral infections and pneumonia
• Elevated rates of complications and death in children under 5

Vaccinating is definitely more safe than purposely infecting a child at a measles party.

Is vaccinating more safe for an individual than not vaccinating? Is it still more safe if everyone stops immunizing? That's a more interesting analysis, and I do plan on crunching the numbers.

Actually 20% chance of hospitalization according to the 2014 measles outbreak study you mentioned, but compare that to the 3% hospitalization of the Amish in the same article -- both with zero deaths -- and you see some of the problems with throwing stats around as if they mean something.

You say:
>The risks of catching these diseases are low, in part because of herd immunity. With 85 percent plus of the population being vaccinated, these diseases have become far less prevalent

Which is true but irrelevant. What the article we are commenting under shows us is that, from a bigger picture and a longer time frame, vaccination has had statistically almost no effect on mortality. There is a reason why vaccine advocates only show charts that start from when vaccination started until now, and the reason is that they zoom way in on the chart to make a very small difference in mortality look massive. When you zoom out, you see that the lions share of improvements in mortality was due to public health improvements and better nutrition. Vaccination has had almost no effect.

True -- measles is rarely seen any more. No one questions that. Vaccines have mostly eliminated it. What thoughtful people do question is whether that is actually a good thing or not, and whether a better plan is to allow people to maintain immunity through catching a disease while preventing mortality through better public health measures, better nutrition, and better supportive care when people do develop a complication.

You say:
>Vaccinating is definitely more safe than purposely infecting a child at a measles party.

But to people who understand physiology, that is a total non sequitur, because vaccination is a completely non-physiologic way to develop immunity. Most infections are mucosal layer infections with foreign virus particles rarely entering the bloodstream -- it is vanishingly rare to ever find viremia in influenza, for example. So IgA is what needs to be stimulated. Yet the flu vaccine injects foreign proteins directly into the bloodstream, stimulating IgG and IgM, which of course have minimal ability to protect against mucosal level infections -- which is why the flu vaccine at best will reduce your risk of contracting the flu by 1/3, and in fact may allow you to get a mild case and keep working and interacting with others and in the process spread it everywhere because you essentially have only partial immunity.

Furthermore, our immune system freaks out when it sees foreign proteins in the bloodstream. That's why the concept of anaphylaxis was essentially unknown until the 20th century when we developed the technology to make needles and to start injecting these proteins directly into the body.

So it is not unreasonable to ask if the explosion of food allergies, allergies to proteins in food, is because our immune systems have been exposed through massive numbers of vaccinations to foreign protein particles or virus particles that resemble food protein particles.

It is not unreasonable to ask if the explosion of atopy, essentially a jacked up immune system whose symptoms are autoimmune diseases, allergies and their associated upper respiratory complications like ear and sinus infections, asthma and ezcema, are because we have pissed off our immune systems by repeatedly tricking them into thinking they are experiencing overwhelming sepsis by putting proteins into the bloodstream through vaccination.

Now, of course the Medical Industrial complex tells us that this is nonsense. And they have all sorts of in house studies to "prove" it -- the best results money can buy. But it is this same type of incestuous regulatory beast that tells us that Roundup is the best thing since sliced bread -- so anyone with a brain should take that with a grain of salt. Especially when whistleblowers like William Thompson show you exactly how the sausage was made, and show you that they cover up research that proves that MMR increases autism in black boys in a statistically significant fashion. Why do they cover this up?

Because they, just like you, are certain that
>Vaccinating is definitely more safe than purposely infecting a child at a measles party.

And when they find data that suggests otherwise, why, the fault must be in the methodology, so they start slicing and dicing the study until the stats tell them what they already know the stats ought to be telling them.

They cook the books because they can't face the possibility that their whole paradigm is bass ackwards.

@gwiss succinct and on target! loved this thread..

One thing to note however is the definition for “unvaccinated” that some of these reports use. Often times they mean “not fully vaccinated” and most of us stopped getting our booster shots after we graduated from school. If that’s their definition then 89% isn’t surprising since that’s probably close to the number of adults who haven’t had their booster shots.

Excellent work @steemtruth, indeed this type of knowledge is like garlic to the vaccine vampires that are seeking control over our bodies! Equally it's the type of knowledge that for some strange reason the majority still don't want to hear! With each passing week there seems to be a new vaccine and it's blatantly obvious that said vaccines have become a cash cow of the highest order!! Really good to have you back and firing all cylinders my friend!!

'Garlic to the vaccine vampires' - love it and so true. It's good to be back. Thank you my friend!

Its very nice ivlike your post

I think people should make their own decisions, and I do not buy into forced vaccinations.
However, having a little girl, I have chosen to vaccinate and I still very much believe it is the right choice.
Being Scandinavian and married to a girl from England, but residing in the US, I often hear proponents and opponents of vaccines, clash on this subject.

When there is an outbreak of any disease, both vaccinated and un-vaccinated individuals will catch the disease. Vaccination is no guarantee and people often point to more people who are vaccinated, catch the disease, but they also fail to understand that most people are vaccinated, but percentage-wise it is not so.

Anyway. I read all the comments here, and I certainly dont want to play the devils advocate, but I think these observations are important:

In 3rd world countries, where vaccination is not readily available, you still see elevated deaths from common, or almost eliminated, diseases. When a vaccine is introduced to that community, you will see a drop.

When I take one of the above graphs - Pertussis (whooping cough) - deaths in England, it is easy to see that the mortality rate fell steadily up until the vaccine was introduced. It is the case for many, if not, most diseases. When a society gets developed and have access to clean water, basic housing and have a working sewage system, the mortality rate dips.
In England, they had indeed seen a steady decline, but there were still about 100K reported cases of Pertussis each year and about 2K died from it. less than 20 years after the introduction of the vaccine, about 80% of children had been vaccinated and only 2K cases were reported each year. Nowadays, it is less than 1000 cases each year and very few deaths. Almost all the deaths are infants who get the disease from their siblings or parents. And yes, they could be both vaccinated and un-vaccinated.

I understand this topic gets people's blood boiling, but know that there are arguments for both sides.

I live in San Francisco, and I consider myself extremely liberal.

Namaste

Understanding the difference between cause and effect .

Everyday millions of children are lined up and injected with toxic putrid substances grown on animal organs, cancer cells, aborted fetuses and other toxic substances. Few people are questioning how those viruses were obtained and how they were grown in a laboratory. If one would ask these sensible questions, one would become very enlightened about vaccine production.

Any medical professional who believes that it is justified to inject known neurotoxins, antibiotics, antigens, preservatives, adjuvants, stabilizers, buffers, emulsifiers, polysorbate 80, aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, live viruses, egg protein, human DNA, human cell lines from aborted infants, and protein from human blood into any person to prevent any disease is completely misguided, misinformed, deluded and ignorant of any logic regarding human health.

"In 1993 a high court judge in the UK decided that it was impossible to know the exact contents of vaccines and that science had no idea what the cocktail of chemicals, contaminants and heavy metals contained in vaccines could do to the human body, or why they would work to prevent disease." -- British Medical Journal, 1993.

To take the result of a disease and claim it will prevent disease was and is absurd.

Toxoids prevent toxins?

Poison prevents poison ?

Cow pus prevents small pox ?

That's like saying pimple pus prevents pimples

Fantastic to see you back @steemtruth we've missed you.
Great post my freind, you can't argue with the numbers. Most people only believe that vaccines have saved them because of the constant propaganda telling them that's the case but we know different.
It's about time the majority learned that they are being poisoned and scammed by bid Pharma and their government puppets.
Great comeback post dude, welcome back.
Resteemed

Thank you so much for your support and kind words @tremendospercy - it's great to be back!

The readiness of the general public to mistake correlation with causation fascinates me. A similar graph can be found for polio incidents, which is possibly the #1 argument for vaccines. The dogmatic nature of pro-vaxxers shaming anti-vaxxers while claiming the intellectual and moral high ground is amusing; charlatans. We also tend to believe public universities provide an education, when they truly only provide an indoctrination. "I never let school get in the way of my education" -Mark Twain.

Great content!
I do agree with what you are saying, the aspects you pointed out are overwhelming obvious and it’s no secret pharmaceutical companies are making a killing off of this market however, I do believe vaccines can help others. I don’t believe everyone in the world needs vaccines, I think the medical community should re-evaluate who and when to administer these vaccines. Steps should be made to improve but, not to completely shutdown the benefits of some vaccines.

Great article. There are so many better ways to stay healthy. The fact that there are even payouts should scream red flags. I'm a lawyer as well as comic creator, and I do not buy the settlements are to protect them from bad publicity. If you're product is safe, you go to trial and you defend the damn product. Settlements are because the product is defective. Look at all the payouts here.

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/

Highly rEsteemed!
This is the best Logic to use to deal with the VAXXERS out there...
You know, the stupid people killing kids in the guise of not killing kids.

A disease isn't an automatic Epidemic, but VAXXERS would have you believe that going without your Toxic Shot you somehow endanger the entire planet.

VAXXERS are seriously more dangerous to the general sanity and welfare of this planet... IMHO.

Well said. Most vaxxers mean well but they have been brainwashed into believing that vaccines are necessary when they are not. Thanks @frankbacon

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ed/Measles_US_1944-2007_inset.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a4/Measles_incidence_England%26Wales_1940-2007.png
Well I'm quite sure non of you will think in another way after looking to those graphs, but I'm sure Darwin will handle this for me.

Yup. My first child was vaccinated, before I knew any better. Then I started shifting to a more natural lifestyle and discovered the Weston A Price Foundation and the book Nourishing Traditions. There are graphs similar to this in the book and A LOT of eye opening information that challenges the mainstream of thinking, with legitimate sources.
Thanks for the post!

we have a pending issue here in our country regarding vaccines for dengue. it is called dengvaxia. there are allegations that instead of curing dengue, those patients who received vaccination from dengvaxia may suffer more and can result to mortality. there are number of deaths and are undergoing investigations and autopsy if theses death are really caused by dengue.

At the end of last year, the Uganda National Expanded Program on Immunization came out to announce the mass immunisation of Hepatitis B which apparently attacks the liver. Most casualties don't survive the first 3 days of attack,the problem has been rampant and so is ebola.....because it keeps on re- occurring

When you say Immunization doesn't stop disease,there is arguably some truth to it,eliminating the disease should take more aggressive solutions from governments and different stake holders

"You can't spread a disease you don't have"
(https://steemitimages.com/DQmSwNxH7myRyxUtRs9352oYJ846gAPRCBK1STzJcigvBbA/image.png)

what about the dangerous side effects?

Which are very rare.

RARE ? Explain rare?
You people act like we have drug deficiencies from science.

Health does not come from laboratories #justsaying

vaccine free and WOW how did I make it past all those dangerous benign microbes lol.

Ever hear of MTHFR gene mutation?
Mycoplasma?
Ischemic stroke?
Bioaccumulation?
Cytokine Storm?
ADEM?
Vaccine induced scurvy?
Encephalitis?
GBS?
NVICP?
Need I say more?

do people research?

I agree, health is really depending on your lifestyle, and I think a lot of our modern lifestyle is unhealthy (eg sitting too much, eating too much, eating wrng stuff). I know you will probably hate on this source but here are some stats about side effects from varicella vaccinations: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/varicella.html
Also, have you ever worked in a laboratory? There is nobody from the government sitting there telling you: oh do this so we can help big pharma. People do research because they want to help people.
Also, you probably know what a correlation is, because that is what you are showing in your data. Science is not about if A then B. That is actually very bad. The rise of alzheimer´s or autism may not be due vaccination, but merely because of other lifestyle problems. Like eating too much meat or protein. There is virtually so much out there that can cause problems, so pinning it down to one issue is not just wrong, but deceiving.
Another problem, you cannot just ignore all the scientific, peer-reviewed studies that shows that vaccinations are safe. I agree, vaccinations can be contaminated and there are side effects. However, research is intense in this area and the great majority has no harmful effects from vaccinations. Long term health effects is a difficult topic anyways. Standards in studies change and nobody can control 5000 people for 50 years and make sure they allow for controlled variables.
Also, I would be more critical of studies that are older than 10 years. Ideally you would want use research that is maximum five years old. Science is rapidly evolving, as are vaccinations.
I must add, I appreciate you not being personal and allowing other opinions.
Cheers!

Just having a friendly debate :)

ALL VACCINES ARE CONTAMINATED !

What is your vaccine contaminated with? Or what is "detectable"

"The key word here is "detectable". You can only find what you have a test to identify. Fetal bovine serum, even batches previously passed by the FDA and WHO, has been repeatedly documented to be contaminated with several different viruses. And every year, new viruses come to the surface, and new tests have to be devised to test for them. The point is that there is absolutely no guarantee that these vaccines do not contain something that is unable to be detected at this time, but which more advanced testing might show up in the future. This is why the manufacturers cover themselves with the word ‘detectable’ – because they can only be held liable at any future date for those things which were able to be identified at the date of manufacture."--Hilary Butler

So the question is what's in your vaccine?
Acanthamoeba
Bird viruses
Chicken viruses
Bacillus cereus
CJD, BSE
DNA, RNA
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) DNA
Mycoplasma
Parasites
Simian cytomegalovirus
Pig viruses
Nanobacteria
Porcine circovirus DNA
RSV
AIDS
SV40 Cancer
HERVK
ALV
EAV
Etc etc

Porcine circovirus DNA found in RotaTeq?
http://www.virology.ws/2010/05/07/porcine-circovirus-dna-found-in-rotateq/

Pig Virus DNA Found in Rotarix ?
http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/April-2010/Vaccine-Contamination-Pig-Virus-DNA-Found-in-Rota.aspx

Do You Know the Extent of Microbial Contamination? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241931/

Other Contaminates? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3206158/

Merck’s Gardisil contaminated with genetically engineered viral HPV
https://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/09/15/in-6-countries-mercks-gardisil-contaminated-with-ge-viral-hpv/

The ‘Infanrix Hexa’ vaccine which is given to babies under 6 months old for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), hepatitis B, poliomyelitis (polio) and Haemophilus influenza type b (Hib) has been recalled due to a potential contamination by Bacillus cereus a bacterium which is known to be toxic to humans.
http://experimentalvaccines.org/2012/11/02/gsk-bacteria-contaminated-vaccines-given-to-babies/

Flu vaccine contaminated
http://www.m.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/news/20041015/fda-all-contaminated-flu-vaccine-unusable

Nanobacteria are novel microorganisms that are not detectable with present sterility testing methods, but they are detectable with new culture and immunomethods. They are commonly present in bovine and blood products and thus in cell cultures and antigens, including vaccines derived therefrom, and may be present in antibody and gammaglobulin products. Nanobacteria are a potential risk because of their cytotoxic properties and ability to infect fetuses, and thus their pathogenicity should be scrutinized. [1997] A New Potential Threat in Antigen and Antibody Products: Nanobacteria

"In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba. Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine......And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances........And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea.We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans."----Jon Rappoport interview of ex vaccine researcher (2001)

The MMR is contaminated with
Avian Leukosis Virus
Which is linked to leukemia
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/98/transcpt/3476t1.pdf

Realize how they are made , with what and where.

Its nasty, toxic, filthy and contaminated!

ALL of them.

inject diseases get diseases.

ever wonder how the hep B vaccine is produced?

it's nasty!!

Yes, and you used some legit sources so thank you for that! But than again, did these result in infections? If these biological contaminations were a huge issue, we would likely have epidemics of these all around the world all the time and I have not been aware of any.
Absolutely correct, viruses evolve and production methods can be messy. That is why science is constantly evolving. For example, I am working on new water filters to filter out estrogenic compounds from surface water (potentially this can cause cancer, although it is unlikely it did). That was not an issue a few years ago. So labs do make us healthy by preventing harm.
And then there is scaling. A vaccination is a very small volume of liquid. The contaminations are in small concentrations. Thus the amounts are so tiny, it is unlikely that they have effects unless you are very sensitive to them.
Since you like examples, I have been vaccinated against everything (except flu because that is virtually a lottery), never gotten any problems from it (like I never had the swine flu). If you are worried about micro contaminations, you cannot drink beer. If you are afraid of heavy metal traces you cannot drink drinking water (some use aluminum compounds in filtration).
Did you ever even read about studies that were researching vaccine safety (I am not talking about studies whose purpose was to verify that they are safe)? I really think you should at least try to leave your paradigm for a little bit and do some research.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_ylo=2014&q=vaccine+safety&hl=de&as_sdt=0,1
This is a link to a search on google scholar. The search term was "vaccine safety" - very much not biased. Just go and read some of these articles (peer-reviewed, no need to sell anything or produce traffic). These are the most legitimate sources you can bring to a scientific argument.
Cheers!

small?
You do know what anaphylactic shock is right?

small amounts of wheat?
soy?
egg?
shell fish?
peanuts?
small amounts form
bee sting?
ant sting?
poison arrow frog?
mycoplasma?

not sure what your definition of safe is?
Life long disabilities? dysfunctions ? diseases and death?

you keep saying vaccine safety? what does that mean?
have you ever researched false claims act?
simpsonwood secret meeting?
VCP virus cancer program?
MTHFR gene mutation?
Mycoplasma?
vaccine induced scurvy?
Double blind placebo controlled study?
AIDS?
eboLIE?
lyme disease?
Synergistic Toxicity?
Polysorbate 80?
CTMB?
Intussusception?
ADEM?
Mitochondria?
Glyphosate > soy peptone broth?
seems you are way behind I'm sorry hopefully I can open your mind

Nah, I am going to throw a towel here. Cheers!

I WILL Leave you with this , And if you still trust drug thugs, not sure what else to say.

Long History of Corruption!!!

In the 19th century, most Americans thrived on more natural approaches like homeopathic medicine.
Then, in 1847, along came the American Medical Association (AMA). Most people didn’t trust this new conglomeration, so to gain the power, money and control they were after, they kept all homeopathic physicians out of their “club,” and proceeded to call all related remedies “quackery.”
If you didn’t want to pay to join the club (by advertising in their medical journal, JAMA), anything you recommended would also be criticized.
From that point on, the AMA turned into a medical monopoly, taking control of medical schools and essentially medical students as well. To put it simply, when the AMA took control of the medical schools, they made it so that only those who graduated from one of them could practice medicine.
And since they controlled the schools, guess what was largely taught? How to use prescription drugs. This intertwining of the drug industry and medical schools is still going strong today, with the end result being a medical model that relies heavily on drugs, surgery and hospital stays, instead of teaching true healing practices.

Of Harvard's 8,900 professors and lecturers, 1,600 admit that either they or a family member have had some kind of business link to drug companies — sometimes worth hundreds of thousands of dollars — that could bias their teaching or research right?

"The last annual report of the Rockefeller Foundation", reported Bealle, "itemizes the gifts it has made to colleges and public agencies in the past 44 years, and they total somewhat over half a billion dollars. These colleges, of course, teach their students all the drug lore the Rockefeller pharmaceutical houses want taught. Otherwise there would be no more gifts, just as there are no gifts to any of the 30 odd colleges in the United States that don' t use therapies based on drugs.

"Harvard, with its well-publicized medical school, has received $8,764,433 of Rockefeller's Drug Trust money, Yale got $7,927,800, Johns Hopkins $10,418,531, Washington University in St. Louis $2,842,132, New York's Columbia University $5,424,371, Cornell University $1,709,072, etc., etc."

http://www.whale.to/b/ruesch.html

Drug thugs

The Real Thugs of the Drug World
Merck: With a long list of deaths to its credit, and more than $5.5 billion in judgments and fines levied against it, it was five years before Merck made its $30-billion recall of the painkiller Vioxx might be a real killer for some people. After the drug was withdrawn, and 60,000 had already died, Merck picked up the pieces painlessly by getting a new drug fast-tracked and on the market.
The drug Gardasil, a vaccine that so far has been linked to thousands of adverse events and at least 49 unexplained deaths. It's a situation that the FDA and CDC have been denying repeatedly, keeping their heads buried in the sand even as the adverse reports mount.

Baxter: Dozens of recalls of products that caused deaths and injuries, at least 11 different guilty pleas to fraud and illegal sales activity, more than 200 lawsuits – many of them stemming from selling AIDS-tainted blood to hemophiliacs – and more than $1.3 billion in criminal fines and civil penalties.

Pfizer: In the largest health care fraud settlement in history, Pfizer was ordered to pay $2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil allegations that the company illegally promoted uses of four of its drugs, including the painkiller Bextra, the antipsychotic Geodon, the antibiotic Zyvox, and the anti-epileptic Lyrica.
Celebrex, Vioxx etc etc

GlaxoSmithKline to Plead Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations and Failure to Report Safety Data

Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in U.S. History

The Washington Post did publish a lengthy summary about a rather huge medical scandal (83 000 deaths or heart attacks), regarding these diabetics treated with Avandia, which tells how a dangerous drug can be voluntarily released worldwide.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/glaxosmithkline-plead-guilty-and-pay-3-billion-resolve-fraud-allegations-and-failure-report

It is a huge problem for anyone getting vaccines, and especially people with certain types of genes that can't detox heavy metals & toxins, that's when the real diseases start. I yelled at my older brother recently for the first time since we were kids, for telling me I need to immunize my healthy daughter. I was furious lol, people actually believe what they see and hear in media.

And when pro vaxers with sick kids tell you to immunize... yeah, no thanks!

MTHFR gene mutation

Yup! And they vaccinate everyone willy nilly without checking first. Not everyone can be vaccinated, It's absolute bullshit. The same way they put mercury in peoples mouths.

right !! http://glutathionepro.com/mthfr-autism/

http://glutathionepro.com/glutathione-autism/

Ever see smoking teeth?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqIdGwAMxxs

Yes i have seen it. Unbelievable. I have mercury poisoning at this very moment from my "silver amalgam" (Mercury) fillings!

The Introduction Of Vaccine Pathogens Grown In Human Tissue Coincides With Explosion In Autism Rates
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7iSZv19Bh4

There are a wide range of people who have their suspicions when it comes to vaccines and their possible side-effects. With this most people tend to focus on some of the various additives and preservatives which are added to the various injections to extend their shelf life, such as Thimerosal. While most focus on that aspect, I wanted to bring up another element that relates to vaccines and their possible side effects, that aren’t talked about as much, specifically in regards to the explosion in developmental disorders such as Autism.

Understand, for every vaccine created they need a medium to grow the pathogens in. These pathogens are neutralized after being grown, but will still trigger an immune response none the less. In the past, the pathogens were grown in animal tissue, such as monkey tissue, dog tissue, cat tissue, and so on. If a person had an adverse reaction to the vaccines grown in animal tissue, in most cases the worst that would happen is the person would get an allergy for that animal, and this is actually the most common reason for a person developing pet allergies in the past.

With this in mind, the powers that be understood that if there was ever a way to grow these vaccine pathogens in human tissue instead of animal tissue, that it would be possible to cause a fairly large number of people to develop an immune reaction against their own bodies, causing a wide range of negative effects against the individual. In the early 1980s growing vaccine pathogens in human tissue became possible, and started being used in some vaccine manufacturing, which stated that using human tissue to grow the vaccine pathogens avoided all chances of having animal DNA cause problems, but with this didn't mention the possible problems that human tissue grown pathogens could cause. Coincidentally the explosion in autism numbers coincide perfectly with the introduction of vaccines grown in human tissue and their steady increase in use over the years, and now-a-days the majority of vaccines are grown in human tissue (which are mainly derived from aborted fetuses).

The problem is, as an unavoidable consequence of this method, small amounts of human tissue can become attached to whatever pathogen they grow in it, and when injected, the immune system identifies the pathogen and everything that is with it as the enemy. This can then cause the persons immune system to attack not only the pathogen, but also various parts of the person’s body where the foreign human tissue settles most. With this in mind, Autism appears to possibly be primarily caused by human tissue grown vaccines such as the MMR vaccine (Measles, Mumps, Rubella), which appears to settle in various parts of the human brain, and in cases where foreign human tissue is found can have a high intensity auto-immune response to the foreign tissue, doing irreversible damage to the targeted area. The amount of damage done to the person appears to be mostly dependent on the intensity of the auto-immune response and the specific location of the response inside the person’s body, which in extreme cases appears to be able to cause developmental disorders such as Autism.

Don't forget about MTHFR gene mutation and Mycoplasma.

Vaccinating with human body parts can cause the recipient to produce antibodies to human tissue. Children produce antibodies to every component of the vaccine, and not simply the viruses. This can cause demylination of the nerves and auto-immune disorders. Children who have been vaccinated with MMR and later suffered autism have been found to have antibodies to their own brain tissue, and this may be a consequence of using foetal tissue in MMR. ‘Susana C. Silva, Catarina Correia and Astrid M. Vicente at the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal and colleagues studied the blood of a large sample of individuals - 171 patients, 191 parents and 54 healthy controls - and report that autistic patients are in fact characterised by presenting in their blood high levels of non-inherited antibodies against the body’s brain tissue.’ (Dr Catarina Amorim; Journal of Neuroimmunology; Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Observatório da Ciência e do Ensino Superior, Portugal; July 23, 2004).

I will some it up for you.

Drug Thugs Big pHARMa Rockefeller Funded < Ignorant Doctors trusting LIARS > 26 doses of vaccines the first year of life >
Aluminum + Polysorbate 80> Over stimulated microglia and astrocytes
constantly pouring out pro inflammatory cytokines during the immunological programming of the brain >
Cytokine storm > Brain inflammation > Encephalopathy > Demyelination > Damage to the protective covering (myelin sheath) that surrounds
nerve fibers in your brain, optic nerves and spinal cord > Nerve impulses slow or even stop > Neurological problems > Oh it is just a
fever that is normal when neurotoxins cross the blood brain barrier > Just take tylenol >
Great deplete your glutathione which is necessary for the removal of heavy metals > Next well baby visit more doses > More Aluminum >
More activation > More inflammation More destruction > Autism.

Try building a house in a storm.

1 cause of Autism? Ignorant

Doctors trusting liars.
Any medical professional who believes that it is justified to inject neurotoxins, antibiotics, antigens, preservatives,
adjuvants, stabilizers, buffers, emulsifiers, polysorbate 80, aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, live viruses, egg protein,
human DNA, human cell lines from aborted infants, and protein from human blood into any person to prevent any disease is
completely misguided, misinformed, deluded and ignorant of any logic regarding human health.

What do you think autistic kids have going on?
Neuroinflammation!
Neuroglial activation!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15546155

I checked out your sources regarding Tuberculosis and the BCG vaccine in Canada (first link doesn't work, you might want to fix it).

You are showing the mortality rate which tends to go to zero after WW2. However, the incidence rate (people contracting the disease) peaks around 1948, the time of the introduction of the vaccine (although according to this source: http://www.bcgatlas.org/index.php it was introduced as early as 1933 in some regions). After that the incidence dramatically declines. That speaks another message than you are trying to convey.

Nice one on leaving this information out.

Also, the BCG vaccine is the weakest vaccine there is and is not recommended anymore in Canada and other industrialized countries. No reason to focus so much on it here.

Okay guys listen to me.. I am talking for only flu. Every single year flue virus mutated and change which means vaccines mean something far away from protection besides there may be some side effects for some people. So this vaccine technology should be changed. It is obvious that the purpose is making drug companies rich and they collabarate with doctors. I am sorry but we all have to know thsoe informations otherwise even doctors may trick us..
Thanks for this post bytheway good job.

Do antibodies determine immunity?
Do infants produce antibodies?

I was wondering
Are there any scientific studies in infants, children or adults to help us understand the nature of the progression of TH1, TH2 and TH3 immune responses to any of the injected materials in vaccines?

What about Children who are congenitally unable to produce antibodies (agammaglobulinaemia) they are able to recover from illness and demonstrate long-lasting immunity to disease?

Does that have something do so with the cell mediated immune response which appears all important in viral infections ?

Are Antibodies or immunoglobulins effective against viruses, which can ‘hide’ within the cells of the body?

A UK study showed that individuals with high diphtheria titres were as likely to develop symptoms as individuals with low or zero titres. Others in contact with the disease such as nurses also were shown to have little or no antibodies to diphtheria but remained disease-free. In addition, some of those who recovered did not demonstrate any antibodies, but exhibited immunity upon re-exposure.

A study into measles also demonstrated immunity to be present in those with no detectable level of antibodies and an absence of protection from the disease in those with high levels of measles antibodies.

Here is an example

Scientists from HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL, M.I.T., massachusetts general, san raffaele institute (Italy), and other institutes, co-authored and published on how they removed all antibodies from mice, leaving only B-Cells, which successfully fought off lethal viruses. This debunks vaccine manufacturers who say that vaccines are necessary to convey immunity. This
suggests that repeated vaccinations could be the reason why some vaccinated people lose their natural immunities, as their body tends to unnaturally rely on temporary, antibody-based immunities.
Immunity 2012 Mar 23; 36(3): 415-426:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359130/pdf/nihms-377739.pdf

Science and their assumptions,
the presence of antibodies in a person means is that the person has come into contact with a particular pathogen, does this mean that they have immunity?

There is so much evidence including the continued outbreaks of disease amongst immunized groups, has led various mainstream scientists to seriously question the current understanding about what constitutes reliable immunity.
Examples
Measles Shedding

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3618578

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20308208

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14646978

For now it's booster time
And shedding is real !

Did you actually read the abstracts from the lowest three cited studies?

>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3618578

"Overall vaccine efficacy was 96.9% (95% confidence interval = 89.5-98.2%). None of 80 Browning students who were vaccinated at less than 12 months of age and revaccinated at 15 months of age or older became infected. " Yes, noone ever claimed that vaccines are 100.00% effective.

>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20308208

" Although 75% of the cases were of persons who were intentionally unvaccinated, 48 children too young to be vaccinated were quarantined, at an average family cost of $775 per child. [...] Despite high community vaccination coverage, measles outbreaks can occur among clusters of intentionally undervaccinated children, at major cost to public health agencies, medical systems, and families."

>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14646978

"Our data suggest that the recommended age for the first dose of measles vaccine during measles epidemics should be lowered to 9 months, with re-vaccination at 12-15 months."

Yes, naturalyl acquired immunity to measles will result in greater protection of the mother's infant (no scientist would argue against that), provided the mother has survived the measles without complications, otherwise she wouldn't be able to give birth.

Sorry, but these studies are not at all in support of your claim "There is so much evidence including the continued outbreaks of disease amongst immunized groups, has led various mainstream scientists to seriously question the current understanding about what constitutes reliable immunity."

Do you remember measles parties ?

True natural herd immunity !
We must get the fever and a rash it is part of the process of natural immunity

@replichara
How about these ?
Measles outbreaks and Shedding

"In an outbreak of measles in Western Sydney in 1993, 73% of cases occurred in children aged 5-9 years who had been vaccinated against measles according to their parents." -Medical Journal of Australia, 1995.

A vast number of children who were injected with a killed measles vaccine between 1963 and 1968 in the United States are now subject, as young adults to what is called "atypical measles". This is a very severe form of the disease in which it appears that, because of the vaccination, there is an increased susceptibility to measles viruses, resulting from a damaged immune response. (JAMA, 1980, Vol. 1244, No. 8, pp. 804-806.)

A review of 1600 cases of measles in Quebec, Canada, between January and May 1989 revealed that 58 per cent of school-age cases had been previously vaccinated. (MMWR, Measles - Quebec. 1989; 38: 329-330.)

"The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons." (Review article: 50 REFS. Dept. of Internal Medicine, Mayo Vaccine Research Group, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN. Archives of Internal Medicine. 154(16):1815-20, 1994 Aug 22. )

Measles vaccination produces immune suppression which contributes to an increased susceptibility to other infections. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology, May 1996; 79(2): 163-170.

"By the (U.S.) government's own admission, there has been a 41% failure rate in persons who were previously vaccinated against the (measles) virus." -- Dr. Anthony Morris, John Chriss, BG Young, "Occurrence of Measles in Previously Vaccinated Individuals," 1979; presented at a meeting of the American Society for Microbiology at Fort Detrick, Maryland, April 27, 1979.

"Our results suggest that infants whose mothers are born since measles vaccine licensure in 1963 are significantly more susceptible to measles than are infants of older mothers and that the risk of measles increases incrementally with each year increase in the maternal year of birth." -- "Increased Susceptibility to Measles in Infants in the United States," Pediatrics, Nov. 5, 1999.

...measles, mumps, small pox, polio and Hib outbreaks have all occurred in highly vaccinated populations, in fact, a measles outbreak occurred in a US Centre for Disease Control-documented 100% vaccinated population;
...childhood diseases decreased 90% between 1850 and 1940 in the US, paralleling improved sanitation, hygienic practices and nutrition well before mandatory vaccination programs;

Over 98% were vaccinated in measles epidemic
Hersh BS, Markowitz LE et al. A measles outbreak at a college with a prematriculation immunization requirement. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(3):360-364. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1994745
NY measles outbreak: 90% were vaccinated.
http://experimentalvaccines.org/2014/03/31/new-york-measles-outbreak-90-vaccinated/

Few more I have saved

Measles in the vaccinated !

According to the New England Journal of Medicine 1987; 316:771-74; Journal of the American Medical Association 1990; 263:2467-71; and several CDC MMWR reports, Measles occurred in the following years, school populations and the percent that were vaccinated:
1984 58 percent of all school age children who contracted measles were vaccinated
1985 99 percent in the Corpus Christi, Texas, measles outbreak were fully vaccinated
1986 96 percent of the Dane County, Wisconsin, measles outbreak were vaccinated
1988 69 percent of all school age children who contracted measles were vaccinated
1989 89 percent of all school age children who contracted measles were vaccinated
1995 56 percent of all measles cases occurred in previously vaccinated persons

1985, Texas, USA: According to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in
1987, “An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced.” They concluded: “We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.”1

1985, Montana, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled, “A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures,” an outbreak of 137 cases of measles occurred in Montana. School records indicated that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated, leading the researchers to conclude: “This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.”

1988, Colorado, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Public Health in 1991, “early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity … due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. They concluded: “…measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations.”

1989, Quebec, Canada: According to an article published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health in 1991, a 1989 measles outbreak was “largely attributed to an incomplete vaccination coverage,” but following an extensive review the researchers concluded “Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.

1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: According to an article published in the journal Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, in a measles outbreak from March 1991 to April 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, 76.4% of those suspected to be infected had received measles vaccine before their first birthday.

1992, Cape Town, South Africa: According to an article published in the South African Medical Journal in 1994, “[In] August 1992 an outbreak occurred, with cases reported at many schools in children presumably immunised.” Immunization coverage for measles was found to be 91%, and vaccine efficacy found to be only 79%, leading them to conclude that primary and secondary vaccine failure was a possible explanation for the outbreak.

These outbreaks are by no means exhaustive of the biomedical literature, but illustrate just how misled the general public is about the effectiveness of measles vaccines, and the CDC’s vaccination agenda in general. No amount of historical ignorance will erase the fact that vaccination does not equal immunization; antigenicity does not equal immunogenicity.

Look up atypical measles

ONLY in the vaccinated

This take a particularly unique type of stupid. Deaths are the most coarse measurement of what epidemic diseases do to human populations. The decreasing death trends were due to medicine getting better at keeping victims if disease alive but did nothing to relieve the life long damage done by these infections By ignoring measures of Morbididty the author tries to make the case that the slaughterhouse that is the "natural world" was getting better all by itself and was soon to enter a nirvana where infectious disease was a thing of the past. Hardly the case. However with China reported another outbreak of plague, bringing to 7 the total numbers of countries reporting cases this year we are soon to get a front and center view of what epidemic disease looks like once again.

So true indeed. It is so important to get the information's and be able to critically analyse the data. I know for some of the people is shocking but yet We were effectively brain washed in the last centuries.

Wow, that is very compelling evidence, thanks for sharing @steemtruth. All the problems caused by vaccines are down played or covered up. On top of that, they don't appear to be saving lives either. It's all about the money.

Where I used to work they gave out 'free' flu vaccines. People don't understand that just because you don't pay for the vaccine when you receive it, does not mean that it is free. The Government pays the Pharmaceutical companies a ton of cash (tax payers money) to buy these vaccines that so many think are free.

Keep away from vaccines, they have minimal benefit, often nasty "side" effects and you are just making big Pharma nice and rich.

Excellent point about taxpayers paying for the vaccines and subsiding Big Pharma. It is a racket from top to bottom. Thanks for adding value to the discussion @spectrumecons

@steemtruth

Civil liability is a consumer protection. In the past, civil liability has protected us from wealthy tobacco corporations selling cigarettes that were once endorsed by doctors and the U.S. government. Civil liability has protected us from defective cars and toys and food and drugs that have passed federal licensing and safety standards.

If your child is harmed or killed by a vaccine you cannot sue the manufacturer of the vaccine or the doctor.

http://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/march-2011/no-pharma-liability--no-vaccine-mandates-.aspx

If your child is harmed or killed by a vaccine, you’re on your own for medical expenses and therapies.
If you think VAERS (the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) will provide a safety net, guess again. Two of every three submissions are excluded and the cases that are accepted linger in court for years. The system is designed to make you give up.
Having said that, for those brave parents who fought to the end, more than 3 BILLION has been paid out in compensation. Where does the money in VAERS come from?
From YOU – every vaccine has an excise tax (from $.75 – $2.25 depending on the vaccine) that you pay. Shouldn’t the drug companies pay that? Silly me, that would take money from the lobbyists!

http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/index.html

Since 1989 vaccine injury compensations exceed 3 Billion paid for by those receiving vaccines.

http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/data/statisticsreport.pdf

"Unavoidably Unsafe"

There are some 5,000 petitions alleging a causal link between certain vaccines and autism spectrum disorders that are currently pending in an omnibus proceeding in the Court of Federal Claims (Vaccine Court).
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf

The vaccine industry cannot survive in a free market, but needs the government to prop them up. In the 1980s there were so many lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies for vaccine damages, that the vaccine industry blackmailed Congress by threatening to get out of the vaccine business unless they passed legislation protecting them from lawsuits. Congress obliged, and legislation was passed preventing the public from suing pharmaceutical companies for damages due to vaccines, and this law was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2011. The pharmaceutical industry now has a free pass to put as many vaccines into the market place as they want to, regardless of efficacy or dangerous side effects, since there is no accountability left in the judicial system.

Today, the pharmaceutical industry is practically a branch of the government. The government awards grants from your tax dollars to research new vaccines, the FDA approves them, and then government organizations like the CDC and UNICEF purchase the vaccines with your tax dollars. The CDC even holds patents and earns royalties on vaccines, and many of the top scientists work for both the government and the pharmaceutical companies. Julie Gerberding, for example, was the head of the CDC from 2002 to 2009, and then took over as head of the pharmaceutical company Merck’s vaccine division overseeing billions of dollars in sales. The government definitely has a vested interest in protecting the vaccine market.

This is fraudulent information that is hawking sensationalized fear for money, while simultaneously accusing big bad pharma of the same. You have embodied the very characteristics you condemn.

Nice clickbait and selective omission of data to support a flawed narrative. Pro tip: Don't use the tag "Science" for this type of information again. Surprised this hasn't been hit by @Steemcleaners yet, as this is flagrant misuse of the tag "Science".

I realize manipulating others for profit has good returns, but try to not be intellectually dishonest for your own wallet while accusing others of the same.

Sincerely,
A scientist (who is clearly just a moron and indoctrinated by "the system", as if the conspiratorial community is not duped by their own ideological circlejerk.)

What is science?

Assumptions?
Theories?
Hypothesis?
Experiments?
Observations?
Beliefs?
Tests?
Predictions?
Verifications?

What does science prove?
Who are the scientists? Operation paperclip type? Erich Traub?
What if the claims are false? Doctors recommended smoking camel cigarettes because of science!!
Most studies are funded by drug thugs most of which make false claims and have been sued.
What if the observer is wrong?
Being paid? incentives? bonuses?
Are the studies done properly? true double blind placebo controlled?
The egg is good the egg is bad lol
Milk does a body? really designer milk?
Cholesterol is bad? yes if its oxidized!! oxLDL
Science is making our food, fats, oils, sugar and chemicals to spray on our food and in the air.
bioweapons? nanotechnology? nanobots?
Science is based on all of these which can be flawed, sometimes we don't find out for awhile.

SV40 ring a bell?
Science is killing us by the millions and drug thugs are making billions treating our symptoms !

FOR NOW Science is in the wrong hands

Trite. You wrote all that yourself?

I would implore you to exercise basic literacy when it comes to data analysis and English; it helps with accuracy -- that is if you are concerned at all with that. It is evident you do not understand the philosophy of science since you need to ask such basic questions of it while also misconstruing it altogether.

Do you have any background in the subject matter, or are you reading off of sensationalized headlines and reiterating them to turn a profit by being deliberately misleading? Do you have a degree in any scientific discipline, or would that just be part of a grander conspiracy? Do you have ANY qualifications to issue such grand claims -- anything at all to help corroborate your brazen shit-talking about myself and colleagues who have dedicated their lives to improving the quality of life of ungrateful curmudgeons such as yourself?

"Science" isn't some central force, or boogeyman that you can just point to and demonize while posturing yourself as virtuous for outing it erroneously.

Also, good sidestep from addressing any of my initial concerns or questions; good burden of proof reversal and putting the onus on me. This is evident you know you are at fault for your actions.

You are being fraudulent and exploiting people's fears for money on Steemit, while you simultaneously accuse others of exploiting fear for profit and assume malice of those in the sciences.

Also, what the fuck does "Milk does a body?" mean? Asking for a friend...

I was told Todd you're not a doctor and i said well Buddha wasn’t a Buddhist. Jesus wasn’t a Christian. Mohammad wasn’t a Muslim, Lao Tzu wasn’t a Taoist, Nanak wasn’t a Sikh.They were teachers who taught love. "Love" was their religion.
The word ''doctor'' is derived from the Latin, docco, which means ''to teach.''
What are the doctors teaching us now a days ?

I don't need to be doctor in order to consider myself smart and capable enough to study and do research on my own. I don't need the endorsement of a medical establishment that teaches very little besides the trade of selling drugs. The science behind it is not very hard and any person with a decent amount of intelligence and common sense should have no issue with getting a grasp of it. I don't need a medical degree nor permission from anybody to indulge my curiosity and desire to learn and help myself and others. MD's don't have bigger brains than the rest of us mortals.
Sheesh, I just get irritated by people's ignorance and arrogance sometimes.
-Zara

Science ?
A degree ? C's get degrees!
A license to practice medicine because you went to school ?
People go to school to get a license to practice driving does that mean they are all good drivers ?

Science is killing us for profit

Hybridized foods
Irradiated foods
Hydrogenated oil
MSG
Aspartame
Nutrasweet
Fortified foods
Enriched foods
GMO's (Glyphosate)
AIDS
Mycoplasma
Lyme
eboLIE
Vaccines
Lipitor
Prozac
Vaccines
Etc etc

Can science be good yes but in the wrong hands you get profit before people .

I'm being fraudulent? Now that's funny !
I guess you never heard of the "false claims act"

Wow

Come talk to me when there is a true double blind placebo controlled study on this mandated schedule not to mention the synergistic toxic effects of combining vaccines.

Oh don't forget about the MTHFR gene mutation

Research mycoplasma and contamination

All vaccines are contaminated ! It's disgusting

Everyday millions of children are lined up and injected with toxic putrid substances grown on animal organs, cancer cells, aborted fetuses and other toxic substances. Few people are questioning how those viruses were obtained and how they were grown in a laboratory. If one would ask these sensible questions, one would become very enlightened about vaccine production.

Do you know how the Hep B vaccine is made ? Or do yiur colleagues know?

Paul Offit has a degree and he thinks it's safe to inject 10,000 vaccines

That's impossible !

And these same doctors with "degrees" tell women not to eat tuna when they are pregnant but then proceed to offer a flu shot haha what a joke !

These doctors are more likely to kill you than an armed criminal

Do yourself a favor and read death by medicine Dr Gary Null

Have a good day and good luck

Long History of Corruption!!!

In the 19th century, most Americans thrived on more natural approaches like homeopathic medicine.
Then, in 1847, along came the American Medical Association (AMA). Most people didn’t trust this new conglomeration, so to gain the power, money and control they were after, they kept all homeopathic physicians out of their “club,” and proceeded to call all related remedies “quackery.”
If you didn’t want to pay to join the club (by advertising in their medical journal, JAMA), anything you recommended would also be criticized.
From that point on, the AMA turned into a medical monopoly, taking control of medical schools and essentially medical students as well. To put it simply, when the AMA took control of the medical schools, they made it so that only those who graduated from one of them could practice medicine.
And since they controlled the schools, guess what was largely taught? How to use prescription drugs. This intertwining of the drug industry and medical schools is still going strong today, with the end result being a medical model that relies heavily on drugs, surgery and hospital stays, instead of teaching true healing practices.

Of Harvard's 8,900 professors and lecturers, 1,600 admit that either they or a family member have had some kind of business link to drug companies — sometimes worth hundreds of thousands of dollars — that could bias their teaching or research right?

"The last annual report of the Rockefeller Foundation", reported Bealle, "itemizes the gifts it has made to colleges and public agencies in the past 44 years, and they total somewhat over half a billion dollars. These colleges, of course, teach their students all the drug lore the Rockefeller pharmaceutical houses want taught. Otherwise there would be no more gifts, just as there are no gifts to any of the 30 odd colleges in the United States that don' t use therapies based on drugs.

"Harvard, with its well-publicized medical school, has received $8,764,433 of Rockefeller's Drug Trust money, Yale got $7,927,800, Johns Hopkins $10,418,531, Washington University in St. Louis $2,842,132, New York's Columbia University $5,424,371, Cornell University $1,709,072, etc., etc."

http://www.whale.to/b/ruesch.html

Drug thugs

The Real Thugs of the Drug World
Merck: With a long list of deaths to its credit, and more than $5.5 billion in judgments and fines levied against it, it was five years before Merck made its $30-billion recall of the painkiller Vioxx might be a real killer for some people. After the drug was withdrawn, and 60,000 had already died, Merck picked up the pieces painlessly by getting a new drug fast-tracked and on the market.
The drug Gardasil, a vaccine that so far has been linked to thousands of adverse events and at least 49 unexplained deaths. It's a situation that the FDA and CDC have been denying repeatedly, keeping their heads buried in the sand even as the adverse reports mount.

Baxter: Dozens of recalls of products that caused deaths and injuries, at least 11 different guilty pleas to fraud and illegal sales activity, more than 200 lawsuits – many of them stemming from selling AIDS-tainted blood to hemophiliacs – and more than $1.3 billion in criminal fines and civil penalties.

Pfizer: In the largest health care fraud settlement in history, Pfizer was ordered to pay $2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil allegations that the company illegally promoted uses of four of its drugs, including the painkiller Bextra, the antipsychotic Geodon, the antibiotic Zyvox, and the anti-epileptic Lyrica.
Celebrex, Vioxx etc etc

GlaxoSmithKline to Plead Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations and Failure to Report Safety Data

Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in U.S. History

The Washington Post did publish a lengthy summary about a rather huge medical scandal (83 000 deaths or heart attacks), regarding these diabetics treated with Avandia, which tells how a dangerous drug can be voluntarily released worldwide.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/glaxosmithkline-plead-guilty-and-pay-3-billion-resolve-fraud-allegations-and-failure-report

Good to see you back @steemtruth. Great post. I sort of wish I'd remained ignorant about vaccines because now, one of my biggest regrets is that I followed the full UK vaccination schedule for both of my children and now wonder whether they have been compromised because of my decision. My daughter is eight and I really want to start trying to teach her about some important (well I think they are important anyway) things but she simply cannot pay attention for more than a minute, finds it difficult to look into my eyes when I'm talking to her and only seems to be able to concentrate when doing monotonous structured tasks. She won't read books and I don't seem to be able to have a proper conversation with her. Maybe she is just too young and I am worrying too much but the thought that vaccines might have played a part in dumbing down or preventing my children from reaching their full potential is something that really worries me.

Wow @jimbobbill - I hear your concerns and I feel for you. If it is any consolation you did what you thought was best at the time so please go easy on yourself. It may just be a coincidence. I do know that some parents have used natural remedies and detoxification which led to improvements, even for autistic children. I can't recall the details as I read it some time ago.

One of the main reasons that I write about vaccines (and health) from time to time is because I have a friend with 3 kids. Two of them were vaccinated and developed autism soon after the vaccine. They did not vaccinate the 3rd child and he does not have autism. It sickens me that some big pharma execs, scientists and government officials know that vaccines can damage children yet keep pushing more drugs and their agendas. If I can do anything to help please let me know.

Bu faydalı yazılar için teşekkürler 🙋‍♀️👏

this is quite a nice statistical trick, to show the number of mortal cases instead of the number of infections. Because of course, medical treatment quality- and also the availability of medical treatment for the masses - increased a lot after WW2. Thus, a lot less people died of those infective deseases.

But that doesn't mean that vaccinations don't help to stop the desease! As you can see here, the rate of new infections goes down significantly after 1963 in the US:
https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/graph-us-measles-cases

I totally agree with @sco, who, by the way, is a toxicologist. It is fair to say that vaccinations are not perfect. But nothing really is. There are thousands of peer-reviewed research articles out there that demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of vaccinations. Here is one recent study:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309914708321#bbib7
This demonstrates that a rotavirus vaccination is 94% effective in the prevention of rotavirus infection.
Yes, you use legit sources, thank you very much for this! But reading scientific sources is another skill that people have to learn and throwing graphs out there without fully understanding them is just as bad as not using right sources. Here is another article that shows what happens if you do not vaccinate:
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en/
Yes, some people are allergic to vaccinations. But again, the statistics show that most people have no problems with vaccinations. And in our modern society, where everybody is spending most their time in clean buildings, it is important to vaccinate. Because we do not have the same exposure to germs in our youth as we used to. Thus our immune systems are getting worse (thus we have increased rates of asthma and allergies).
I have no intention to insult anybody. There is enough evidence out there. Use google scholar and search for yourself. Do not just listen to one guy trying to sell you something but educate yourself. Cheers!

Toxicology ? Then you understand synergistic toxicity ?

I put these notes together for you to understand what information is available

Synergistic toxicity is a well-known phenomenon where the combination of toxic substances can be greater than the sum of its parts. Therefore, mixing two non-lethal levels of chemicals inside a vaccine can lead to an extremely toxic mixture. The medical community appears to gloss over this very pertinent fact that appears to be progressively killing more infants every year.

No study exists on the combination of vaccines given to children in a real world setting, with or without additional environmental insults such as antibiotics, or with regard to genetic susceptibilities.

No study has looked at the possible effect of the synergistic toxicity of aluminum and thimerosal, which are never supposed to be used in combination (according to the Manufacturer Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for thimerosal ) and are indeed combined in many shots (according to the Vaccine Excipient Summary from the CDC).

And no controlled study, not one, exists on the effect of low dose ethyl mercury toxicity in humans.

SO HOW CAN WE SAY THEY ARE SAFE WHEN THERE ARE NO STUDIES TO BACK IT UP?
But Autism is on the rise?
And many neurological disorders

Things that synergistically increase the toxicity

"The elderly are more susceptible than young adults because of decreased levels of protective glutathione and melatonin. "

I would add tylenol use too because it depletes glutathione, even further,
which is necessary to remove mercury.

What is a toxic dose ?
Dr. Haley (Toxicologist) declines to state a toxic level of mercury because patients differ in their ability to detoxify and excrete the mercury. Also, many
factors synergistically increase the toxicity of a given level.
Example
Antibiotics.
Both ampicillin and tetracycline have been shown to enhance
the neuron-killing effect of thimerosal, perhaps by enhancing its delivery to specific sites.

"combination of substances in toxicology can be greater than the sum of its parts. "With lead and mercury, for instance, a toxicity rating of 1 for each mercury and lead equals not 2, but 60 when combined."---Hal Huggins

Another important factor with regard to mercury on the mind, which officials at the CDC, FDA and the professors in the IOM do not consider, is synergistic toxicity - mercury's enhanced effect when other poisons are present. A small dose of mercury that kills 1 in 100 rats and a dose of aluminum that will kill 1 in 100 rats, when combined have a striking effect: all the rats die. Doses of mercury that have a 1 percent mortality will have a 100 percent mortality rate if some aluminum is there. Vaccines contain aluminum. Mercury on the Mind by Donald W. Miller, Jr., MD

"A single vaccine given to a six-pound newborn is the equivalent of giving a 180-pound adult 30 vaccinations on the same day. Include in this the toxic effects of high levels of aluminum and formaldehyde contained in some vaccines, and the synergist toxicity could be increased to unknown levels. Further, it is very well known that infants do not produce significant levels of bile or have adult renal capacity for several months after birth. Bilary transport is the major biochemical route by which mercury is removed from the body, and infants cannot do this very well. They also do not possess the renal (kidney) capacity to remove aluminum. Additionally, mercury is a well-known inhibitor of kidney function."--Boyd Haley Ph.D.

In other experiments the addition of aluminum, antibiotics, thimerosal and testosterone increased the toxicity of mercury significantly [Haley 2005, 2006].
One of the reasons more boys get Autism than girls.

Autism mercury / testosterone

Boyd Haley, Ph.D., Professor and Chair of the Chemistry Department, University of Kentucky discusses the issue of testosterone and mercury:
"One of the conundrums of autism is the 4:1 ratio of boys to girls that get the disease. We therefore decided to test the effects of both female and male hormones on the neurotoxicity of thimerosal. The results were eye-opening. For example, 50 nanomolar thimerosal causes less than 5% neuron death within the first three hours incubation and 1 micromolar testosterone causes no significant death within this time frame. However, mix these two together and 100% neuron death was observed at the earliest time point checked. This represents a severe enhancement of thimerosal toxicity."

Haley B & Small T. Biomarkers supporting mercury toxicity as the major exacerbator of neurological illness, recent evidence via the urine prophyrin tests. Medical Veritas 2006; 3: 1-14.
Haley B. Mercury toxicity: Genetic susceptibilities and synergistic effects. Medical Veritas 2005; 2: 535-542.

A good example demonstrating 'synergistic toxicity' is a 1978 study on mice (Shubert et al. Combined Effects in Toxicology – A Rapid systematic Testing Procedure: Cadmium, Mercury & Lead. J. of Toxicology & Environmental Health 4:763, 1978). The study took the amount of mercury salt that kills 1 in 100 mice and 1/20th of the amount of lead salt that kills 1 in 100 mice. When these amounts of mercury salt and lead salt were administered, the synergistic toxicity of these two toxins killed 100 in 100 mice:

If Additive toxicity, one would expect 1 + 0.05 = 1.05 mice to die (1 or 2)
With Synergistic toxicity, the results were: 1 + 0.05 = 100 mice died

Synergistic Toxicity of Vaccine Adjuvants (e.g. Aluminum with Thimerasol (mercury)

Evaluation of synergistic effect of biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles and aluminum based adjuvant for improving vaccine efficacy.
Reported incidences of toxicity and side effects of aluminum have raised concerns regarding their safety in childhood vaccines.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24939616

Exposure to mercury and aluminum in early life: developmental vulnerability as a modifying factor in neurologic and immunologic effects.
Ethylmercury (EtHg) and adjuvant-Al are the dominating interventional exposures encountered by fetuses, newborns, and infants due to immunization with Thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCVs). Despite their long use as active agents of medicines and fungicides, the safety levels of these substances HAVE NEVER BEEN DETERMINED, either for animals or for adult humans—much less for fetuses, newborns, infants, and children … the potential synergic effect of both toxic agents has not been properly studied. Therefore, early life exposure to both EtHg and Al deserves due consideration.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25625408

MOST IMPORTANT!!!!
Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
Analysis showed a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.
All nations—rich and poor, advanced and developing—have an obligation to determine whether their immunization schedules are achieving their desired goals. The authors: “Goldman has served as a reviewer for the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Vaccine, AJMC, ERV, ERD, JEADV,and British Medical Journal (BMJ). He is included on the Editorial Board of Research and Reviews in BioSciences.” "Miller, a medical research journalist and the Director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute, has been studying the dangers of vaccines for 25 years."

The US gives twice as many doses of vaccines prior to age one than Japan and Sweden
We rank at a horrible 34th with 60 countries better
Japan and Sweden 1st and 2nd
Must be another coincidence like SIDS and Autism
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/

2014 (DEATHS/1,000 LIVE BIRTHS)
6.17
Over 60 countries better?
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2091rank.html

Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons: was there a synergistic fetal toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season?
The observed reporting bias was too low to explain the magnitude increase in fetal-death (demise) reporting rates in the VAERS database relative to the reported annual trends. Thus, a synergistic fetal toxicity likely resulted from the administration of both the pandemic (A-H1N1) and seasonal influenza vaccines during the 2009/2010 season.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23023030

"Synergistic Toxicity"
Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine administered simultaneously with measles vaccine is associated with increased morbidity and poor growth in girls. A randomised trial from Guinea-Bissau.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21093496

Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 21 Number 2 Summer 2016

Our study showed that infants who receive several vaccines concurrently, as recommended by CDC, are significantly more likely to be hospitalized or die when compared with infants who receive fewer vaccines simultaneously. It also showed that reported adverse effects were more likely to lead to hospitalization or death in younger infants.
These findings are so troubling that we expected major media outlets in America to sound an alarm, calling for an immediate reevaluation of current preventive health care practices. But 4 years after publication of our study, this has not happened. Could it be because, according to Robert Kennedy, Jr., about 70% of advertising revenue on network news comes from drug companies? In fact, the president of a network news division admitted that he would fire a host who brought on a guest that led to loss of a pharmaceutical account. That may be why the mainstream media won’t give equal time to stories about problems with vaccine safety.

Conclusion
The safety of CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule was never affirmed in clinical studies. Vaccines are administered to millions of infants every year, yet health authorities have no scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants are likely to receive. National vaccination campaigns must be supported by scientific evidence. No child should be subjected to a health policy that is not based on sound scientific principles and, in fact, has been shown to be potentially dangerous.

That’s not a correct argument. Your graphs show that vaccines were not as effective at stopping diseases compared to the increase in sanitation and cleanliness. It would require scientific evidence to claim that vaccines do not stop diseases.

Vaccines probably cause more disease than they cure.

Vaccines spread disease. They are no longer needed in western civilization given cleaner food and water plus sanitation is what cured most diseases. Vaccines are now being used to sicken us which is very evil..

EXACTLY !!

@team-solutions has promoted your post.
Thank you for the great content. Please tag any work about solutions with @team-solutions and I can then promote your work. I am not a bot and do not want anything in return, just want to help. Good luck with you future work.

Enjoy the vote and reward!

Vaccines help so many ppl and before we had vaccines so many ppl died. The virus can evolve and can change and that why sometimes one vaccine doesn't work on specific virus.
Each vaccine work on different strain of virus (or combination of strains) and if there is a new strain out there it won't be affected by the vaccine.
It also can helps our immune system.
It is not black and white- you can give your body a chance against Flo virus, but not against papiloma (might get cancer from it)

First post for me :) Excellent stuff @steemtruth

This guy said it all for me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYkYH5FPKGE

I'm honored to be your first post @madevi - welcome to steemit!

Feel free to join our discord channel Truth - Politics - Conspiracies under PAL (Peace, Abundance, Liberty). You will find lots of friendly and awake people where we support each other and our content.

If parents should vaccinate their children in part to protect other people from contracting a disease, why shouldn't smokers stop killing 50,000 people a year from secondhand smoke?