Is it that these vaccines are not properly prepared or is it that something is wrong? Vaccines was suppose to keep kids safe but these charts here states otherwise. My goodness

it's good you educated the public on this, thank you do much

Vaccines were never supposed to keep kids safe, that was just a lie to get people to willingly use the harmful products on their children. This is all part of a bigger agenda to control the population and keep those people unhealthy.

That's that main agenda of vaccines, keep kids safe

Hahah for a new world order.

@josediccus - there are many reasons why but in a nutshell it boils down to profits and power. Big Pharma and other industries own politicians, they also own the media, education system, colleges etc. The UN and governments around the world are proxies for Big Pharma, Bankers etc. Gov't approves vaccines and other drugs with small sample sizes, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest.

It is also an effective way to depopulate and keep people medicated from the cradle to the grave. I encourage you to look further into the dangers of vaccines. You will find a number of other posts on my (and others).

Wow this is new to me I've never in my life thought vaccines could be so used to main and decapacitate children, I will check your other posts and thanks for informing me really.

Simply associations. Not causations. Big difference's.

awesome post. Thank you for this

Thank you for this post because todays people don't know so much thing about vaccines actually they know it wrong. Vaccines pass is not new but it is kind of unsuccessful process and the aim is gaining money for drug companies.

You should worry not only about vaccines but also for other drugs you should suspicious for them also.Especially childhood vaccines may have crucial and permanent damage

Drug thugs make false claims all the time!
They have secret meetings like the Simpsonwood secret meeting.
They keep things confidential like SIDS.
They need customers not patients because a cured patient is a lost customer.
It is crazy out there! it is like one big experiment and we are the guinea pigs.

Agreed. There's no golfing money to be made from healthy people. You can't charge 800 a visit for a healthy person. Healthy people don't need a "doctor."

LOOK It's a bird 🐤
It's a plane ✈
NO IT'S THE TRUTH TRAIN!! 🚂

A local well known hospital advertises that you will encounter real doctors with real advice who give real medicine. Is that the same real medicine that was given to women for hormone replacement, causing heart attacks, strokes, seizures, breast cancer, harming their livers and kidneys and killing thousands of women?

Real medicine where?
Prozac

Accutane

Vioxx

Chemotherapy

Radiation

Vaccines

AIDS-tainted blood to hemophiliacs

Avandia

The Washington Post did publish a lengthy summary about a rather huge medical scandal (83 000 deaths or heart attacks), regarding these diabetics treated with Avandia, which tells how a dangerous drug can be voluntarily released worldwide.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/glaxosmithkline-plead-guilty-and-pay-3-billion-resolve-fraud-allegations-and-failure-report

Real advice?
Real medicine ?

FDA Approved deaths by medicine
100,000 a year plus!

They are selling you vaccines and injecting them into you when you are healthy for profit, which are causing life long disabilities, dysfunctions , diseases and even death. They then sell you symptom based pharmaceutical products, for profit, to treat the damages and disorders they have caused.
Now you have a customer for life!

Genius!

Only in aMERCKa

And to think jack kevorkian was doing something wrong and got in trouble! He had consent!

Doctors blindly inject healthy infants with something toxic filthy and contaminated WITHOUT informed consent!
Your baby dies and they chalk it up as SIDS?

Some
Ignorant
Doctors
Stat

Go right back to work with pay !
NO REMORSE
NO LIABILITY
NO ACCOUNTABILITY
RIGHT BACK To poisoning everyone for that blue cross and blue shield bonus!

Source.

https://wellnessandequality.com/2016/06/20/how-much-money-do-pediatricians-really-make-from-vaccines/

You think your doctor has your best interest or his best interest?

DOLLAR$ for Docs
Look up your doctor 👀👀
https://projects.propublica.org/docdollars/

HARM
3.5 + billion in compensation
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/data/statisticsreport.pdf

VACCINES Cause SIDS
But it is kept confidential

http://www.inquisitr.com/1751130/doctor-claims-that-hexavalent-infanrix-vaccine-causes-sudden-death-of-babies-anti-vaccination-advocates-question-why-report-was-confidential/

Perhaps your doctor isn't meeting the quota. For most HMOs, its 85%, but even the NIH admits that there are bonuses for DRs with a high compliance rate. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1508536/

It is a huge money maker for local doctors. Every vaccine they give you, they can charge for. I don't know what the mark up is, but I suspect it is a lot. A clinic sees 100 kids a day, and they all get multiple vaccines... $$$

Just a side-note: As long as people are being extorted by non-voluntary taxes, there is no free market and it will always end bad..

My family and friends are really enjoying John Bergman on YouTube. I think you'll find his presentations very positive for what they cover and in a similar format. He demonstrates with examples and repeatedly encourages critical thinking .

Good side note and thanks for the lead to John Bergman. I will definitely be checking him out.

Good call on John Bergman @jamesc most people don't realise that the key to the vast majority of our health lays within the gut. Indeed within our bodies we carry a vast sum of diseases and it's the health and balance of said gut that keeps them at bay. From this perspective the problem is that many modern medicines destroy this essential gut balance i.e they alleviate symptoms at the expense of long term health.

There's no profit to be had from healthy people.

This is so true. After a DPT vaccine in 1998, I tasted metal in my mouth for 2 weeks afterward -- a sign of impending shock according to one doctor -- then my health just fell apart. I developed an autoimmune condition which doctors couldn't identify. Everything I ate wrecked my gut. It has taken me YEARS to recover my health. I'll never get another vaccine again.

Perceptual ....not only does a healthy gut prevent disease, good nutrition is vital for recovery if you do become ill -- and of course you need a healthy gut to process that nutrition.

Hey @sungazer and yes the problem is that because our guts become unbalanced that by the time we reach a certain age the vast majority of us are suffering from varying degrees of leaky gut. As such (like you say) a large percentage of what we eat is simply passed through our system and our bodies are unable to absorb the nutritional content of the food we eat. In essence you can have an amazing diet but will only receive a fraction of the benefits. From this perspective, I highly recommend buying kefir grains and producing your own kefir.

That makes so much sense -- about the leaky gut. And yes, kefir. I have dairy goats and am going to use the raw milk for making raw butter, raw cream, and raw cheese -- my first set of kids just weaned, so now I have milk. The last time I tried kefir, I had autoimmune/histamine issues with it, though it is possible it's because I was at the time feeding GMO grain to my goats --- which I no longer do. I got rid of the goats because I believed it was the dairy itself making me sick. Then a couple of years later I bought some raw goat milk from a woman who fed her goats only pasture, non-GMO hay, and lots of veggies and leftovers from their garden. I drank her milk all summer and experienced excellent results. So then I got some baby goats, and started all over again. I made my first batch of raw cheese yesterday, and will get some kefir grains next time I go to town for supplies. Fingers crossed!

This is totally new to me
Never knew this.
I thought vaccines were supposed to prevent some diseases.

Thank you for sharing

Inject diseases get diseases .
To take the result of a disease and claim it will prevent disease was and is absurd.

Everyday millions of children are lined up and injected with toxic putrid substances grown on animal organs, cancer cells, aborted fetuses and other toxic substances. Few people are questioning how those viruses were obtained and how they were grown in a laboratory. If one would ask these sensible questions, one would become very enlightened about vaccine production.

The main thing they do is weaken your natural immune system. That's by design too.

Sadly big Pharma and their bought and paid puppets in national governments doubled down on the lies and cover ups a long time ago so many more children are going to be vaccine damaged before anything ever changes.
Great information @steemtruth Resteemed of course, everyone needs to read and absorb this post.

Via the spreading of vaccine awareness we can save lives, including kids from the harmful and in some cases deadly side-effects of vaccines! More and more people are beginning to question the lies and propaganda that the medical profession and their governments keep telling them.

Thank you once again @tremendospercy

The British Medical Journal
Only 6% of drug advertising material is supported by scientific evidence
http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7438/485.2.full

Doctors trusting drug thugs for their information
http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7438/485.2.full

The number of vaccines given to children these days is disgusting. There's no good reason for it.

26 doses the first year of life.
60 countries better in IMR what does that tell you? more doses more deaths

Yep!

Keep pushing your agenda while accusing others of the same. I assure you that nothing good comes from talking ridiculous shit about the STEM community and medicine while simultaneously relying on them to generate revenue from this type of content. Without big-bad science you wouldn't have a platform to preach from, and let's be honest, you're in this for the money by posting this on Steemit while hurling accusations of others being greedy.

"It’s time for Big Pharma, Gov’t and MSM to stop driving one-way agendas and manipulating data and test results"

Declared in confidence after manipulating data to push a one-way agenda. Trite.

Please don't use the "Science" tag for this again, as this is most certainly a perversion of it. Do you wonder why this material gets flagged? Wonder no longer.

posts that attract friends,

Haha and trolls! ;)

vaccines cause trolls ;)

why laugh, some funny yes.

Also: Correlation does not imply causation.

Explain how infectious diseases decline when vaccines are introduced when correlation does not imply causation ?

Thanks for posting this comment, I'm really disgusted by anti-science posts like this that manipulate statistics to push their anti-vaccine agenda.

I could make much more money writing lighter content and earn more money than I do now, but I don't. You don't know me or what my motivations and intent are so please don't pretend that you do by linking my posts back money.

It has never been about money for me (sure it's helpful but it is not a primary driver). If you'd read my Why I'm on Steemit - Reason 4 blog you'd see that I have made plenty of money in the past and that I plan to give almost everything that I make away while I am still alive so that I can direct how it is spent.

If you'd read Billionaire Secretly Gives Away His Entire $8 Billion Fortune Away in 34 Years – True Story! you'd know that the actions of men like Chuck Feeney inspire me to help others.

> Please don't use the "Science" tag for this again, as this is most certainly a perversion of it.

I didn't realize that you were the person in charge of the 'science tag' on Steemit. It must be a great responsibility and burden for you to carry the weight of determining what constitutes science. Should I pay homage to you and obey your wishes or should I continue to blog about the darker-side of science that more and more people are now questioning?

The graphs and findings in this post were assembled by a scientist with a PhD. Who are you to define and frame what is and isn't science? Greedy men have had a strangle hold on the sciences for over a hundred years. They determine the curriculum, who gets funding and who doesn't and generally dominate and control the narrative just as you are trying to do now.

You are free to blog about any topic that you wish and so am I. That's the wonderful thing about free speech. Only those with an agenda or something to hide are afraid of free speech and transparent and open debates like these.

Shit dawg, I didn't know you were so virtuous and that scientists were so evil, but also somehow necessary to corroborate your minimalist MS Paint figures with psychedelic graphics to really make them pop!

And a scientist with a Ph.D? That's almost as good as Dr. Oz with an MD! Plenty of people who have a Ph.D are out to lunch, much like your post is. There is something in the sciences called consensus, and you should become familiar with it before you go hurling accusations and vilifying people who have dedicated their entire lives to reducing human suffering.

You've rehashed the same trite conspiratorial drivel for 3 posts this week now. The science community is getting real sick of your posturing as a truth-sayer, all while degrading them. I'm not the ambassador for the science community, but I'm certain they would agree with the sentiment that it's time to call it quits. There is a reason your garbage analysis gets flagged; it's a fucking public safety issue.

> I didn't know you were so virtuous and that scientists were so evil.

I'm not virtuous by any means but I try my best to be. The vast majority of scientists are not evil but rather deceived and/or silenced for fear of speaking out and losing their tenures, job etc.

> your minimalist MS Paint figures with psychedelic graphics to really make them pop!

I didn't create the graphs, the scientist that created the study made did.

> There is something in the sciences called consensus

Science is not about consensus but rather evidence. Scientific consensus has in almost all cases proven to be incorrect with the benefit of time and hindsight - it has been that way for thousands of years - if you think that the status quo has suddenly changed overnight you are seriously deceived. For thousands of years scientific consensus has been wrong and to think otherwise is an exercise in ignorance.

Shall we go back to attaching leaches and draining patients blood to fight infectious diseases or would you prefer lobotomies for patients with mental disorders? Scientific consensus believed that this was the best treatment at the time and likewise, scientific consensus believes that vaccines do more good than harm - history repeats itself but each generation thinks that they won't make the same mistakes as their predecessors - that is not only arrogant but incredibly naive.

> hurling accusations and vilifying people who have dedicated their entire lives to reducing human suffering.

Like you are doing now? Ever heard of the word hypocrite or applying double standards? I have dedicated my life to reducing human suffering which is why I cover the topics that i do. You sir, do not have a monopoly on who is reducing suffering and who is contributing to it - you just have an opinion and you are entitled to it - as am I.

> The science community is getting real sick of your posturing as a truth-sayer

Wow, you're also the spokesperson for the entire scientific community - I'm honored that you have chosen to grace my blog with your presence! Did you survey every scientist in the world or just the ones on steemit before you arrived at your personal consensus

> I'm not the ambassador for the science community, but I'm certain they would agree with the sentiment.

You sure are acting like an ambassador/spokesperson e.g. speaking for the entire science community. Your actions are not congruent with your writings.

How exactly are you certain that the entire scientific community agrees with your sentiment? I can share quotes and links from many scientists that disagree with your subjective assumptions (and that's all that it is - your opinion).

I'm quite sure that you mean well but that does not mean that you are right!

> There is a reason your garbage analysis gets flagged; it's a fucking public safety issue.

Yes, it is a public health issue. People are dying and permanently injured due to vaccines. I'm glad that we can agree on one thing.

This is a censorship issue masquerading as a public health issue! Truth does not fear investigation but powerful elements within the scientific do fear investigation - hence the threats of flagging and attacks on any scientist that choses to buck the status-quo!

You are not going to change my opinion and I am more than likely not going to change yours - let's agree to disagree shall we!

Oh, fuck, the "doctor" made those figures? Makes sense though, given he's listed as a fraud by others within the scientific and medical community:
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/vaccines-didnt-save-us-intellectual-dishonesty-at-its-most-naked/ (This one even cites the terrible figures you've purported to be infallible evidence)
http://americanloons.blogspot.ca/2014/04/993-raymond-obomsawin.html
http://www.pathguy.com/antiimmu.htm

This further serves to illustrate that it is you, not the entire scientific community, that is easily duped. Don't be intellectually dishonest and call it science -- it makes us all look bad.

Also, don't put shit in my mouth and expect me to chew; we agree on nothing.

Science ?
Assumptions ?
Beliefs?
Hypothesis?
Theories?
Publications?
Studies?
Experiments ?
Observations ?
Tests ?

ALL of which can be flawed!
Lied about !
Paid for!
False claims!

Science Is in the wrong hands ,
Profit before people science

Get a grip.

grip on reality in which you shouldn't ignore.

Your semi-coherent ramblings would be laughable if they weren't a public health risk.

keep trusting drug thugs
molecular wizard now that is funny

research mycoplasma and you might learn something maybe even MTHFR gene mutation.
There is a show called do you think you are smarter than a 5th grader

Unfortunately the science community is not in consensus. There are studies on both sides showing both the benefits and risks when you are willing to see the whole picture. You will quickly discover there is not a 100% guarantee that vaccines will work or that they are even safe for you and your family. As a mother of three, having witnessed "adverse reactions" myself in my children and others and then reading the vaccine package inserts you will find information that will really astound you.

If you have children or ever decide to have children these kinds of matters are not something you can just accept from the pharmaceutical and healthcare industry without first being very thorough. It is a fact that out of all developed countries the United States has the highest infant mortality rate and we also have the highest number of doses of various vaccines given before the age of 2. Every year they seem to add another one as well.

There are so many factors from toxins to genetics but I really urge you to dig deeper. You will be shocked when you start to see the truth. Here are a couple vaccine package inserts from the FDA. Just take a look at the "adverse reactions" aka "possible side affects" aka "contraindications" and the fact that vaccines like the MMR and chicken pox vaccine must be grown on living human tissue, tissue that was taken from fetuses should be cause for concern. We are taking viruses and bacteria mixed with DNA fragments and injecting them with a whole slew of preservatives including aluminum and formaldehyde. We cannot accept without knowing first ....

https://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/fdagov-public/@fdagov-bio-gen/documents/document/ucm123789.pdf

For the MMR

https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM124514.pdf

and for the Dtap

Trust me on this one, I used to be part of the anti-vaccination crowd back when I was rather impressionable in my late teens and early 20s. I understand that there can be adverse reactions -- a close friend of mine is an example of having an anaphylactic response -- but the "evidence" used to demonize scientists and medical health professionals as a part of some grandiose conspiracy is blatantly false. I also understand how the false sense of knowledge from these crowds can be so alluring, complete with the sensation of acceptance within a community where everyone is a part of the same self-validating ideological circle-jerk.

Of course the FDA lists the possibility of side effects -- shit happens in the real world and the medical community likes to be prepared. Vaccines are constantly in development to ensure that we can make safer and more effective immunizations; no one said vaccines were 100% effective -- only you did. I'd take the negligible risk of adverse reactions over the much higher probability of spreading diseases that carry debilitating consequences.

Also lol@"There's DNA fragments!"
There's DNA in the food you eat, and your own cells, and the bacteria in your mouth employ it as a structural component of dental plaque. Fun fact: Everyone is a mutant of some kind and DNA is everywhere. Humans got their ABO blood group proteins (the glycosyltransferases for the more literate) from bacteria in a horizontal gene transfer event estimated to have occurred around a million years ago. Might sound spooky to those who don't know any better, but it's really not. Stop with the scare tactics that exploit scientific ignorance to hawk a false narrative -- that is, unless your own scientific ignorance has been exploited to get you to join a cause, in which case you are excused. You may not know any different, but some of these people know not to perpetuate such flawed logic and call it "truth".

[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmVCPzKhRKYKSbTteNnnTL5FEXCkUG3JZKTM7gVpvfVJst/DNA%20does%20not%20work%20that%20way.jpg]

Its called insertional mutagenasis and it is when foreign DNA fragments are injected directly into tissues as this peer reviewed scientific study explains.

http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ilmed31&div=23&id=&page=

In addition eating DNA and injecting DNA are two very completely different things. Many of the potential risks listed under adverse reactions for many of these vaccines often list the very illness trying to be prevented therefore they know that in some individuals it actually gives them the illness thereby spreading it, not preventing it.

In addition autoimmune diseases are springing up following vaccination in previously healthy individuals as a result of insertional mutagensis.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/new-study-in-journal-of-public-health-finds-autism-and-cancer-related-to-human-fetal-dna-in-vaccines/5402912

This is old information but it is clear that its unpopular to share among people who seem to take it so personal that vaccines are not 100% safe nor 100% effective. The risks are too great and if you can ignore reading the vaccine package inserts but then proclaim them as safe you are being exactly what you are accusing of others...

Cute. I actually know a thing or two about DNA, recombination, and mutagenesis; you know, being a biochemist and all. The fetal tissue part is what really gets me, what with the appeal to morality and all. I'm pretty sure scientists make vaccines to kill babies -- that's gotta be it!

Thanks for trying out!

Wait so if you know a thing or two about DNA why would you even compare eating DNA to injecting it. You know they are completely different... and what do you mean the fetal tissue really gets you? Do you mean you are unaware that vaccine manufacturers use live human tissue to grow human viruses for vaccines? And that in order to find compatible fetal tissue several fetal tissue samples were tested until viable host DNA was found? And besides that how can you proclaim vaccines prevent diseases which have "much higher probability of preventing diseases with debilitating consequences" when they in fact can give the recipient that very disease when the recipient's immune system does not respond as intended. It is true not all vaccines are created equal as each have very different rates of adverse reactions and effectiveness. But as someone who is educated in biochemistry, shouldn't you be looking at ALL of the facts especially if they don't all add up?

The only thing that doesn't add up is your conflation of recombinant DNA vaccines with live attenuated vaccines, and the lack of understanding of what a virus is. Of course researchers need living tissue to grow a virus -- viruses require live cells to hijack their function to propagate themselves; they're not a free-living and independently self-replicating organism. Also, embryonic tissue sounds easy to vilify (because baaabies; oh no!), but I reallly think you're misunderstanding how mammalian cell culture works, or the use of embryonic tissue at all. This is starting to sound like an anti-Planned Parenthood thread now.

Easy to think none of this adds up when the information is presented in a vilifying and sensationalist manner that doesn't show the whole picture. That is what conspiracy theorists do, and that's what you're appealing to over objectivity, while claiming to acknowledge all the "facts".

You have been mislead, and yet are convinced it is others who are incorrect.

Thank you so much for writing exactly what I wanted to say. I'm no biochemist, but what you are saying makes a whole lot of sense. To be actively fighting back the people who don't agree with science despite the fact that you account is only one month old is very courageous of you. I wish there were more people like you on steemit that could fight back (or at least more people who understand why this "vaccines cause autism" thing is completely false). Also another thing that's stupid in the original person's post is a vaccine study from 1991-1997. This outdated data is one of the reasons why people believe that vaccines are harmful. In fact, he only posted a small part of the data. It just happened as a coincidence that the rates of autism were increased. Thank you again for all of your hard work!
[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmf8cLLEFwiiqWksivVuVmZ4nnEvhh1GWDLTryaLLCPSE6/image.png]

Its really unfortunate @joshglen and @molecular-wizard if you have never read the 20 plus adverse reactions from each vaccine insert, you wouldn't even know that with them the list includes things like childhood arthritis, childhood lymphoma, encephalopathy which by the way includes seizures and long term neurological damage. I am not ignorant to the facts and I do not deny that for some, the intended immunity is achieved but the FACT is thousands are vaccine injured every year and if you are unwilling to weigh the risks and the benefits equally despite the fact that the pharmaceutical industry continues to dismiss the risks then you are not looking at the whole picture. I have many friends who work in the medical industry and we have many conversations about this but the fact is and they agree, there are risks and people are being vaccine injured and though they feel the benefits out weigh the risks, I personally do not but to claim that this is "conspiracy" to share and spread awareness about the risks... is only continuing the pharmaceutical corporate sponsored marketing strategies. I hope you will reconsider how you choose to approach this in the future for the sake of science and truth. We could all benefit from being more open minded about the truths of both sides.

I do understand that there are adverse reactions that could be caused. However, if you have read the insert and/or packet of information that the doctor's office has given you, you would see that the incidence of such serious reactions is extremely unlikely and low. The most common thing would be either pain in the area or a fever, and anything more than that is highly unlikely due to the statistics of each vaccine. Yes, some have more problems than others, but the ability to be immune (or even partially immune) far outweighs the risk of some of these adverse reactions, the majority of which are both mild and short term.

Well it is good you are willing to see that adverse reactions do in fact occur. The rates are not given in the doctors office however and the information sheets we are given are CDC sponsored information which includes SOME of the adverse reactions but not all.

For the sake of this I will refer to the Dtap, a very common emergency room and childhood vaccine which was created to create immunity against diptheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough).

Here is a link from the FDA for the Dtap by Infanrix:
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM124514.pdf

If you take a look you will see it says a number of things about the vaccine...
-Progressive neurologic disorders, including infantile spasms, uncontrolled epilepsy, or progressive encephalopathy is a contraindication aka adverse reaction to administration of any pertussis-containing vaccine, including INFANRIX
-afebrile seizures were reported at a rate of 13% for a sample of 2,457 individuals (pg 12)
-inconsolable unusual crying lasting more than 3 hours occurred 9%
-hypotonic-hyporesponsive occured non-responsive behavior occured 1% of the time

My first child went into one of these hypotonic non-responsive states after her 3rd Dtap. She wouldn't talk, eat or make eye contact and when she went to sleep she slept abnormally long and had neck spasms and twitches for many months after.

She also developed a severe respiratory infection a week later.

In addition, the rest of these adverse reactions are listed without a rate or percentage of occurrence listed.

-Bronchitis
-Respiratory tract infection
-Anaphylactic reaction
-Hypersensitivity
-Encephalopathy neurological brain damage (Declining ability to reason and concentrate, memory loss, personality change, seizures, and twitching are common symptoms)
- hypotonia (commonly known as floppy baby syndrome, is a state of low muscle strength sometimes causing and inability to stand or walk)
-syncope (Symptoms include paleness, nausea, sweating, a rapid heartbeat, and fainting)
-cyanosis ( a bluish discoloration to hands or feet, usually caused by low oxygen levels in the red blood cells or problems getting oxygenated blood to your body)
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (listed at the bottom of page 12)

And the big one for me is that in this manufacturer package insert is clearly states " studies have not been conducted with INFANRIX. It is also not known whether INFANRIX can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity." (pg 13)

Yet this year they have begun to pressure pregnant women in doctors offices and hospitals around the country to get this vaccine. I have discussed this with mother's who miscarried shortly after receiving this vaccine and it is very heartbreaking. Who has decided to push this on pregnant women?

The CDC states on their website as of July 2017 "The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that pregnant women receive the whooping cough vaccine for adolescents and adults (called Tdap vaccine) during the third trimester of each pregnancy.Jul 24, 2017" yet there are no studies to support this decision.

In my opinion this is a very serious situation putting lives at risk and for what? For corporate gain? Many can speculate as to why but the why isn't as important as questioning everything coming from the CDC when they have clearly been corrupted by special interests.

But is it really surprising that sectors of our government have been corrupted by special interests?

I will admit, sometimes, vaccines do exactly as they were intended without causing an adverse reaction but for those who aren't so lucky they are chastised and ridiculed when they themselves were not informed and then left to deal with the life long consequences that can occur.

Chances are, if they were listed without a percentage it is because they occur so infrequently that a study did not need to be conducted. And while vaccines don't always work, their effects of counteracting things such as whooping cough much outweigh the risks.

"How does getting immunised during pregnancy protect my baby?
The immunity you get from the vaccine will be passed to your baby across the placenta. Getting immunised during pregnancy will help protect the baby in the first few vulnerable weeks of life, until he or she is old enough to have the routine immunisation at 2 months of age. " - http://www.immunisationscotland.org.uk/vaccines-and-diseases/whooping-cough.aspx#sideeffects

The possible adverse effects do not outweigh the protection that both the baby and mother receive, especially because the immune systems of infants are so weak. There does not need to be a study that supports this decision because there have been many studies that show that the immune systems of infants are weak, such as https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4707740/
While it is unfortunate that mothers have miscarried, that could have been a coincidence as well and not a direct cause of the tdap vaccine.

you get injected DNA regularly. viruses and other viroids inject DNA into cells. If you get at last once flu or cold your cells in throught have been regulary injected by orthomoxoviridea. if somone get hepatitis B liver cells remain infected for life infected with Foreing DNA.

This guy is troll and can’t put up a good argument. When a commentor is demeaning and starts throwing fallacies like a monkey...it’s not worth the energy it takes to respond....

Unless you want to speak to the lurkers that are reading comments. I speak to the lurkers...

This is such a bad argument i actually giggled

I’m going to be writing an article on how to argue badly for a few laughs

>Trust me on this one, I used to be part of the anti-vaccination crowd back when I was rather impressionable in my late teens and early 20s

I know, he's being rather rude and condescending about it but I guess my hope is that if we can try our best to stop this "us" and "them" rhetoric we can share more truths. You are right some are simply trolls so wrapped up in their own perspective they cannot even consider information that may challenge that perspective but I guess I continue to respond thinking of my children... I've heard so many mothers say... I wish I had known there were risks before my daughter got her 6 month vaccines and suddenly had uncontrollable pretty regular seizures. I'll share and I'll try. At some point people see its not 100% for vaccine safety or effectiveness and just seeing that is a step I feel. Thank you @reddust

I don’t think we should play Russian roulette with a persons life because it may save another’s life. I don’t mind a good argument but when faced with bad arguments wrapped in scientific jargon I just can’t stand it and have to walk away....they as in opposing views are trolling.

I’ve been in too many debates over the years, mostly Buddhist debates...when I saw certain signifiers in the opposing arguments I realized the author is being trolled and decided to shut down my side of the argument.

But I did a thing or two from this thread. I need to brush up on my argument skills and learn the standard pro-con vaccine arguments.

I found a website that gives both sides of the most common vaccine arguments.

I bought a couple ebooks that teach the art of argument so I can argue effectively and learn something too. I’m not here to win an argument ... I’m here to learn how to communicate

Keep up the good fight brother. This has proven to be thankless work, except for your upvote on earlier comments in this post.

Cause and effect do you understand the difference ?

Does pimple pus prevent pimples ?

Cow pus prevented small pox ?

Poison prevents poison?

Toxoids prevent toxins ?

You've spammed this same comment multiple times on multiple posts now. Do you seriously think immunology can be reduced do your haphazard analogies? It is evident you have no understanding as to how the immune system functions and will only appeal to information that fits your confirmation bias.

I believe it is you who does not understand cause and effect.

P.S. Your Steemit name is a tragic irony.

Understand immunology? Like what antibodies do not determine immunity?
"Effective" means that a vaccine is injected (vaccination) into the patient, and the patient develops an antibody. Vaccination does not mean that the patients develops an immunity.
Scientists prove that the antibodies from vaccinations
ARE NOT NEEDED.

To prove this, scientists from HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL, M.I.T., massachusetts general, san raffaele institute (Italy), and other institutes, co-authored and published on how they removed all antibodies from mice, leaving only B-Cells, which successfully fought off lethal viruses. This debunks vaccine manufacturers who say that vaccines are necessary to convey immunity. This
suggests that repeated vaccinations could be the reason why some vaccinated people lose their natural immunities, as their body tends to unnaturally rely on temporary, antibody-based immunities.
Immunity 2012 Mar 23; 36(3): 415-426:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359130/pdf/nihms-377739.pdf

there is more to the immune system than just antibodies

I will repeat myself as many times as drug commercial repeat themselves about all the damn side effects just to get a hard on

I remember my first book on health and nutrition like 25 years ago lol

Oh those drug deficiencies

hypocrite. you will get help in myocardial infarction emergency from a doctor but not and advice from a cardiologist for vaccines.

Regarding Adverse Reactions: You would save a lot more people by taking guns and cars off the street then ending vaccine mandates. If people walked more that would help individual and public health.

Well unless you know someone who has ended up with an auto immune disease following a vaccination, in rare cases coma and seizure occur, and then the fact that each vaccine has differing effectiveness rates is really the root of it. Each vaccine should be looked at separately and then their cumulative effects as well. Some will still choose a vaccine despite the risks but those risks are largely ignored and rarely communicated to parents of children or even adults themselves. When they start pushing shots like the HPV on our youth when it has not been proven effective against STD cancers and it has been causing infertility, comas, paralysis, seizures and death I have a serious problem with that, especially when news outlets shy away from covering those stories.

I cannot disagree with approaching each vaccine seperately, yet for the last 24 hours of debate on this article, the Anti-Vax opponents have changed arguments everytime I brought specific evidence to their arguments that support a different conclusion then their own.

I do not know any specifics about HPV vaccines, but I do know the risks were communicated early and often and I was never within the suggested demographic for that particular vaccine.

Anti-Vaxxers are on an anti-business tangent in their general coverage oft his matter, yet none have been able to answer if ending public funding for vaccines will actually provide a benefit. Their style and adherance to formal argumentation is squirlley enough I have to ask if this is not a politically motivated campaign to divert funding to military efforts instead.

Please read the rest of my comments on this post in the frame of strict critical thinking and argumentation rules.

Ok I'll take a look when I have a minute. I know that when we are emotional it is hard to be logical. The fact that some states are beginning to take away the freedom to choose or decline a vaccine has definitely caused quite an emotional response especially regarding children.

I certainly don't want government officials harassing me for my personal choices especially when we are not given the full scope of risks involved with vaccines. Corporations are designed for the sole purpose of earning profits and marketing strategies can create a very one sided perspective on the matter.

For example a representative for "medical research" whose pay check comes from a pharmaceutical company will be paid to produce research that emphasizes the benefits over the risks. The risks are often briefly mentioned and dismissed assuring one it is perfectly safe (despite the looooong list of adverse reactions). If you have never heard of "shedding" it would go to show how much information they keep out of the mainstream.

Shedding is when a vaccine strain of a virus spreads to others from an individual who was recently vaccinated... rather than protecting and preventing the illness it can sometimes spread it and there are a number of peer reviewed studies that support this. If you are interested in this aspect of vaccines here is a link for many of those studies. Anyway I will look at your other comments and thank you for being up for a more respectful conversation about this... http://medscienceresearch.com/shedding/

This post is an example of how anti-vaccine groups manipulate scientific information to justify their claims stating that the deleterious effects of vaccines could overcome the consequences of an unvaccinated population. It is serious to mention as a source the world health organization, when this organization maintains campaigns to distribute vaccines at low cost to low income countries.
The comparison must be made with the morbidity and mortality of diseases preventable by vaccines when these did not exist.
A current example can be felt in Venezuela where, due to inadequate health policy, the coverage of the vaccinated population decreased, which has resulted in a large number of deaths due to diphtheria, a disease that was eradicated and that I had not had the opportunity to meet in my country through 22 years of professional practice.
The worldwide recommendation of both the World Health Organization and all pediatric societies is to vaccinate

The large number of deaths from infectious diseases in Venezuela can be directly attributed to lack of proper nutrition, hygiene, and horrible living conditions. Vaccinating people who are suffering ill health because they cannot afford proper housing and healthy food won't fix the problem that caused the disease. The body can't fight off disease when it's starving to death and living in filthy crowded conditions like city slums.

>A current example can be felt in Venezuela where, due to inadequate health policy, the coverage of the vaccinated population decreased, which has resulted in a large number of deaths due to diphtheria, a disease that was eradicated and that I had not had the opportunity to meet in my country through 22 years of professional practice.

that's why they should be vaccinated

I’m glad your are writing about this, your ariticle compliments my history of vaccine series!

Thank you @reddust - your comments are encouraging!

This is just wrong. The thing with children without vaccines not dying is that everyone arround them got vaccines so they are protected because there is noone with the virus. If nobody would use vaccines it would be much worse.

i enjoy your post ^^! Thanks.

good!.

A great post with excellent information. We are familiar with www.vaccinetruth.org with Wendy callahan as well as Dr. Tenpenny. Both great researchers. we gave you an up vote, a RESTEEM and a follow..

Thank you for supporting me and vaccine truth and awareness @monetaryrealist

Of course vaccines kill children. It is not about healthcare for children., it's about population control. Children are the future of our world. There is a war on against our children and our future. This is being accomplished through vaccines, through foster care and adoption CPS Child Protective Services, through the food and so much more. Yes they are killing our children through vaccines. But they are doing it on a lot of different fronts. Our children are our future and there's a war on our future. The shadow government knows exactly what they're doing. Thanks for sharing and making us known collapse to people.

All excellent points @enjoywithtroy - you know what's going on. If vaccines didn't cause deaths and injuries we would not need vaccine compensation programs that have awarded billions of dollars to claimants.

Thank you for your support and contribution!

I'm following you now!

Feel free to join our discord channel Truth - Politics - Conspiracies under PAL (Peace, Abundance, Liberty). You will find friendly and awake truthers and we try to support each others content.

All truth tellers and seekers are welcome to join us!

A Truther - That is a political activist who is supported by politicians like Donald Trump, who's aim is to reduce government spending on healthcare by eliminating vaccines? Is it really about saving our children or saving money for the military to kill somone elses children? You are terribly missled to be going down this road.

this the great information, i am also a researcher tea member. we all ready noticed this mobility and mortality rate. what is already a weak virus of any infection or disease but some times vaccines injected wrong time in the children's body that's the reason of children's infected with this vaccine virus and this is the cause of Death.

we have always had very poor and undernourished people but they were protected by vaccines, and they did not suffer from immuno-preventable diseases. There are epidemiological strategies that demonstrate the real impact of vaccination in poor populations.

Good article steemtruth. And look at some of the vaccine religion folk howl! It doesn't matter how many charts, figures or facts you throw at them, it makes no difference. You can't reason with religion. The truth could be a 2 by 4 banging them on the head, it wouldn't help.

They are blinded by science for the most part and heavily indoctrinated. They don't know what they don't know but hopefully we can change that in time!

The analysis are statistically weak. The report graphs made up by the meta analysis cover only one year after flu vaccines were mandated. Under 5 deaths compare only developed countries against developed countries. And provide a total number of deaths not rate of deaths. A mini baby boom could invalidate those findings.

That is when I stopped. You need a longitudinal study of at least 30 years to make a case, and if there is already 30 years of information prior with mortality rates and vaccine rates being studied, that prior study wins the validity tests. Given the provided information the argument is, "See the numbers one year after mandatory flu shots!"... which is alarming but not a clear cut case of vaccines being a culprit.

If you study mortality rates from native countries versus immigrant morality you would gain even more insight into the overall effectiveness of vaccines provided you can control for environment.

Best case scenario that supports your reported evidence is that one year after mandatory flu vaccines there was a correlation between vaccine rates and Under 5 Mortality rate but the standard deviation from 30 years prior is not provided so this result might even be with the normal range.

I'm going through this data base. There are over 1,000 matches for influenza vaccination
> Felix JK, Schwartz RH, Myers GJ. Isolated hypoglossal nerve paralysis following influenza vaccination. Am J Dis Child 1976 Jan;130(1):82­3.....

>BIBLIOGRAPHY ON DAMAGE FROM VACCINES
Some references for any further information
(From 1926 to December 2009)

http://www.mednat.org/vaccini/bibliografia_danni_vaccini.pdf

Well show that there is a molecular reaction or biological pathway between vaccine agents and the hypglossal nerve (I assume the case in point was not a vaccine delivered directly to the hypoglossal nerve which is in the cranium) and it something to look into. You then have a causation argument that has one isolated event as evidence. Still very weak.

When people say trust in science, they are saying trust in the methodology of science, which you have every right to be critical of and by reporting these findings are participating in the very methodology people are asking parents around the world to trust. If the evidence of benefit for an action outweighs the evidence of consequences, then science sides for the action. When the evidence for consequences outweighs the benefits, science sides with non-action. Through the methodology human civilization tunes its understanding of the actions they perpetuate.

Another aspect to look at is, there are more qualified medical professionals to study the effects of vaccines today than there was in 1926... And better record keeping. There may be highly specific circumstances that lead to and adverse result, but by in large using standardized protocols and vaccines, studies support the use and administration of vaccines. The Doctor who led the "Vaccines Cause Autism" studies and alarm was found to be falsifying data to support his hypothesis which lost him his profession. Just because it was published in a journal or by a doctor does not establish a solid conclusion.

That’s just one case out of thousands of papers in this data base that record disease relate to vaccines.

Regarding old case studies, age does not invalidate the findings or study. Regarding falsifying data, I don’t know which doctor you are speaking of ...

>Other than the FDA staff, nobody is independently checking the integrity of vaccine safety data provided to the FDA by drug companies when they seek licensure of a new vaccine. The public is asked to "trust" that the drug companies are telling the truth about vaccine safety. Sure they are.

https://youtu.be/uNWTOmEi_6A

> That’s just one case out of thousands of papers in this data base that record disease relate to vaccines.

Yes. One Isolated case of Hypoglossal nerve damage. If there were hundreds of cases in your database describing hypoglossal nerve damage, you would have something to work with. Here is a Hypoglossal nerve damage case with only the common cold as the originating factor.

> Regarding old case studies, age does not invalidate the findings or study.

I said there were more qualified medical professionals now and better record keeping than in 1926. This means if there are more observers now, there are more articles in journals now. There are even more medical journals now.

> Regarding falsifying data, I don’t know which doctor you are speaking of

You must be very new to this topic. Please read about Andrew Wakefield

> Video Just Posted

No argument there. Someone will have to pay for every batch of medically manufactured vaccine to pass the government standards test. Medical treatment costs in the US are among the highest in the world. You can either fight for better testing or more cost effective healthcare. Up to you, but tough to get both in this case. Show that ending mandatory vaccines will provide both over the course of your average citizens life without creating a public health hazard.

updated: added journal article on "isolated reversible hypoglossal nerve palsy" case from common cold.

It is concerning that you are not as critical over the information you gleaned from the "Vaxxed" movie as you are of medical literature. @reddust or should I say @redhanded??

It’s concerning you don’t care about the millions of vaccine injuries. Bring up the movie rather than content, deflection tactic.

> It’s concerning you don’t care about the millions of vaccine injuries.

you are trying to reason emmotionally, not based on reasoning. I clearly invited you to be critical of published science and literature and demonstrated that the evidence you are using:

1. is anecdotal
2. has too short a time horizon
3. increases in volume due to increased observers and records

You then showed little knowledge of the events surrounding the anti-vax movements leading researcher, additionally you are unable to defend using the Hypoglosal Nerve paralysis report paper (it is not a study) as evidence for anti vaccination.

Your time is better spend ending private automobiles and guns on the street. Perhaps, you want to divert funding from public health to the military instead to fight proxy wars for business interests. That too should be a concern of yours.

It is concerning how little you actually care to put in the right efforts in making vaccinations cost effective and safe, if millions of children's lives are actually at stake.

I am critical of all sides and when you assume I am reasoning using the emotional fallacy and accusing me of an emotional mind state, I know you are manipulating the argument. Thank you for showing your true colors.

My concern is with the millions of people who have been and are injured or have died by allopathic medicine war on disease. You will not be able to sidetrack this dialogue through condescending remarks. The net has opened up all the information regarding the lies the vaccine industry has sold the general population since 1850s.

You did not attack the Vaccine industry until very late in the argument. Since it was not in your opening remarks, arguing in such a manner is sidetracking.

You have presented evidence that has been specifically refuted. You decline to defend your positions, and instead resort to tit-for-tat commentary. This led me to believe you are just arguing out of emotion instead of putting the right effort into sticking with the evidence that you bring up to support your position.

happy today for you!

thanks u for information

Thank you so much for sharing this very important information! So many don't know and this is the perfect place to share the truth. Thank you for your work... these posts you make are extensive!

Thank you for taking the time to read it and commenting. I really appreciate your support and input @janellelanae

Absolutely. I see some comments above are rather nasty and its really a shame. But then again sticking your neck out and shedding some light in dark corners, sometimes you are bound to find trolls. Keep doing what you do and try to take pity on small minds who are so caught up in the status quo. By helping to share the truth with those who are open, you are making a difference and that's the key! @steemtruth

Very well said @janellelanae - I will not be silenced and a few trolls do not concern me. They most likely mean well but are sadly deceived and blinded by science and big pharma and government propaganda.

The way you handle moronic comments is truly inspirational - I've never seen this many vaxxer comments before - a whole new low...

http://www.frot.co.nz/design/health/vaccination/

[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmeZdHYqmeRWkhtm2SdnRhdZ5BqNLSnEc8QqTyhgNYcGjW/image.png]

I'm waiting for your support.Thank you

Congratulations @steemtruth, this post is the eighth most rewarded post (based on pending payouts) in the last 12 hours written by a Hero account holder (accounts that hold between 10 and 100 Mega Vests). The total number of posts by Hero account holders during this period was 373 and the total pending payments to posts in this category was $14782.38. To see the full list of highest paid posts across all accounts categories, click here.

If you do not wish to receive these messages in future, please reply stop to this comment.

Recently some good friends of ours found out we do not vaccinate or kids and they just turned on us! They refuse to listen or look at any evidence...very sad, great post...thanks

So sorry to hear, it really just enforces how well the corporate marketing strategies have been at influencing the masses :-( .

SHOCKING REVELATION THAT YOU WON'T BELIEVE — BIG ORGANIC COVERUP: ORGANIC FOOD CAUSES AUTISM BECAUSE THIS GRAPH SHOWS THEY ARE CORRELATED WITH p<0.0001!

[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmPJ3uSAqj2brJhD24J5NqQBre2TZwtUUvSgkeuZG9KZfH/Autism%20and%20organic%20food.jpg]

Your analysis is bad and you should feel bad. Correlation hardly implies causation; especially for the circumstances given. Thanks for coming out.

Oh no! Do cell phones cause autism too? Because that's suuuuurely what it looks like.
https://geneticliteracyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Autism-and-Cell-Phone-Trends.jpg

See my recent post for more humor...

wow I made it 46 years without vaccines that's crazy ALL those benign microbes.

do you want some benign Hepatitis D virus?

I strongly agree to this! I have a daughter who is 4 months old. During her 1st month,i observed how strong her lower limb is,she often kick and tried to stand on my stomach while carrying her. I really have a big doubts on giving her a vaccines since i heard and read some articles against vaccines, other part of me believes that she also need it coz that’s what i’ve learned as I am a licensed nurse, and so i did letting her pedia to gave her vaccines which is BCG, after a month they gave her first shot of Penta vaccine (consist of DPT,HiB,polio,HepaB). Reaction as expected is Fever.

After 3rd and 4th week of my observation, i decided to STOP letting her Pedia giving her 2nd dose of Penta. As i observed my daughter,that her lower limb is so weak than before,she can’t hardly kick nor stand compare on her first month. I realized that i can no longer put my child at risk by giving vaccines,and just continue my breastfeeding journey. A lot my friends questioned my decisions. But that’s a mom instinct.And now i’m so thankful to God that she’s so active,smart and healthy.

A lot of my friends questioned my breast feeding, can you imagine that? I am sorry for your poor daughters suffering and relieved she has recovered. I didn't give vaccines to my children until they were older and I breast fed my kids as well, this was back in the early 80s. They were never sick until they started getting their vaccines after the age of 5 years old.

really!? Can’t imagine they did questioning u about feeding, babies are meant to be fed from mothers milk! Not cow’s milk..🙄
Sad really, we can’t pleased them, even we want them to be educate. Whenever they’ve questioned us and we answered them along with proofs,they rather chose not to believe..😩

Most of the mothers in my community worked and I think they would of loved to nurse their babies. Think they felt envy and guilt.... But during that time no one could afford to stay home. I made a choice to stay home and live lean so my babies could get a healthy start.

I was raised on a farm and all our bottle feed calves and sheep were weak and had poor health. I didn’t want that to happen to my kids. The money I saved on formula and childcare actually made staying home affordable.

I salute u for that! That’s why i also stopped working as a nurse and rather use my nursing skills to takecare of my family since it would be more helpful. I did also tried to make some research to do natural remedies to improve more about our healths..My collegues think i’m crazy coz i’ve spent a lot of money to study and earn my degree in Nursing and i chose not to believe in conventional..for me it’s not bad to believe and learn between conventional medicine and natural medicines.. coz right now its really useful for us family.[IMAGE: https://steemitimages.com/DQmWJm3jJnHqXZgCPuXHgtrbEVF69uGmPhGrUoZh57AJ2ED/F9897E10-E2B0-44C0-A657-9D75399A4CE7.jpeg]

I share this pic to you. I told them not to spend their money to flu vaccines but rather chose to spend more in vitamins..

You youngest is not circumcised and barely has any vaccines at all and will not get any more. He is, without a doubt, the healthiest of the four children. It's no mystery.

Wow that’s great!👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
My mom told me when we were a kid,they completed our vaccines. They never missed in our doctors appointment. And guess what, they always rushed us in the emegency room and spent 2-3weeks of confinement in the hospitals...

When I was a kid, I only got a couple vaccines. These days they are completely out of control of course.

My Grave's Disease went undiagnosed for years because my parents had no idea what they were doing nutrition or health wise.

I still remember eating table sugar all the time too, and then I wondered why I had acne, was always sick, and my teeth were rotting no matter how many fluoride treatments I got. har har

When you were a child, did they crush up aspirin in sugar water when you were sick? LOL The stupidity.... it's mind boggling. I'd have a high fever, but they'd keep feeding me table sugar. Genius! ;-)

imagine why most of the countries implement the vaccines faster than any projects,and why is it mandatory to all their people,even government is under big pharma!so powerful and corrupt!

Yep, there's a lot of profit in death and sickness. :(

Mike Adams (aka the Health Ranger) who runs a website called 'Natural News' talks a lot about the impact of vaccines, gmo, etc... suggest you check him out. It hurts to see big pharma stealing cash from families and I appreciate your post. Thank you

Wow, this is one of the biggest bullshit articles I've read all over the World Wide Web.

As an example, one can name the correlation between vaccinations and autism. At that time, the British doctor Andrew Wakefield (who is no longer a doctor since he was deprived of his license) has conducted a study with 12 children. His study was published by "The Lancet". At that time, the false claim was made that vaccination should increase the likelihood of developing autism. That was wrong, of course, but the media presence was huge. Apart from the fact that there were only 12 subjects ...

The study was withdrawn many years later by The Lancet. And of course no one noticed that.

In any case, the UK vaccination rate dropped from 92% to 80%. Even in Germany, where I come from, the impact rate dropped considerably and is currently at about 86% - so not enough to protect infants or immunodeficiency!

In German: Wow, das ist einer der größten Bullshit-Artikel, die ich im ganzen World Wide Web lesen durfte.

Als Beispiel kann man den Zusammenhang zwischen Impfungen und Autismus nennen. Damals hat der britische Arzt Andrew Wakefield (der heute kein Arzt mehr ist, da ihm seine Zulassung entzogen wurde) eine Studie mit 12 Kindern betrieben. Seine Studie wurde von "The Lancet" veröffentlicht. Damals wurde wurde die falsche Behauptung aufgestellt, dass das Impfen zu einer höheren Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Autismusentwicklung führen solle. Das war natürlich falsch, aber die Medienpräsenz war riesig. Mal ganz abgesehen davon, dass es nur 12 Probanden waren...

Die Studie wurde übrigens erst viele Jahre später von "The Lancet" zurückgezogen. Und mitbekommen hat das natürlich auchk keiner.

Jedenfalls sank die Impfquote in Großbritannien von 92 % auf 80 %. Auch in Deutschland, da wo ich herkomme, sank die Impquote erheblich und liegt derzeit bei ca. 86 % - also nicht genug, um Säuglinge oder Immunschwache schützen zu können!

Great work my friend, you really are firing on all cylinders since your return and it's so important that this information is given as wider audience as possible. Whether people believe the findings or not, this is still the debate of our age and it's one that needs to be held in a balanced and adult fashion. I for one think the people deserve a televised debate with two opposing experts. Like you say the "truth should fear no investigation" but they run from any aspect of debate on this most important subject.

Indeed it's often forgotten that Professor John Walker Smith, the man who co-authored Wakefields MMR lancet study and carried out some of the tests that showed a link between MMR and autism was exonerated on all charges. He won his court battle and had his name cleared by a high court judge and his professional misconduct findings quashed. Like I say both sides of the story need to be told! Thanks again @steemtruth

Great comment @perceptualflaws. A truly independent televised debate would be awesome but we both know that the debaters would be hand-picked so as to make the side that is questioning vaccines look incompetent. That may actually do more harm than good but who knows? At least it would become a talking point for many people and get some things out in the open.

They did a hatchet job on Wakefield. I didn't know about Smith, that's great news.

I should be posting another blog later today.

This is horrible ..
Day after day, we discover that we are completely drugged by these regimes that seek interests at the expense of peoples
Increasing taxes. Media fake ..

How can inoculations be given for neglect the body receives?
How can you vaccinate a body against abuse?
How can you be immunized against bad diet and insufficient vitamins and minerals?
It can't be done.
The allopathic medical establishment is looking into test tubes for answers.

Naturopaths feel that microbe death is at the expense of poisoning the body with the drugs or vaccines. Poison on top of poison fails to get at the root cause of all illness, which is "polluted body" or systemic toxemia.

Get rid of the flies or the garbage?

Do you poison the dirty fish tank water or clean the fish tank?

Do mosquitoes make the water stagnant or are mosquitoes attracted to stagnant water?

Don't give the the Antibody BULL!!
There is more to the immune system than antibodies.
Science and their assumptions,
All that the presence of antibodies in a person means is that the person has come into contact with a particular pathogen, it does not mean that they have immunity.
Antibodies are just ONE part of the immune system.

Good Luck with that.

truthtrain

Abnormal thinking
Abnormal pathogen
Abnormal route
Abnormal immune response
Abnormal results
Abnormal look on your face

Ischemic stroke

There is almost 60 countries that have a better IMR than us and we give the most vaccines the first year of life!

26 doses of adjuvants! Inflammation! Activation! Destruction during the immunological programming of the brain.

A local well known hospital advertises that you will encounter real doctors with real advice who give real medicine. Is that the same real medicine that was given to women for hormone replacement, causing heart attacks, strokes, seizures, breast cancer, harming their livers and kidneys and killing thousands of women?

Real medicine where?
Prozac
Accutane
Vioxx
Chemotherapy
Vaccines
Bextra
Avandia
The Washington Post did publish a lengthy summary about a rather huge medical scandal (83 000 deaths or heart attacks), regarding these diabetics treated with Avandia, which tells how a dangerous drug can be voluntarily released worldwide.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/glaxosmithkline-plead-guilty-and-pay-3-billion-resolve-fraud-allegations-and-failure-report

Real advice?
Real medicine ?

FDA Approved deaths by medicine
100,000 a year plus

I just wanted to re-share this in the main thread... an individual who feels vaccines have more benefits than risks but is willing to agree that adverse reactions do occur...

It is good you are willing to see that adverse reactions do occur. The rates are not given in the doctors office however and the information sheets we are given are CDC sponsored information which includes SOME of the adverse reactions but not all.

For the sake of this I will refer to the Dtap, a very common emergency room and childhood vaccine which was created to create immunity against diptheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough).

Recently however, it has been being pushed on pregnant women in the United States which is another issue to touch on later.

Here is a link from the FDA for the Dtap by Infanrix:
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM124514.pdf

If you take a look you will see it says a number of things about the vaccine...
- Progressive neurologic disorders, including infantile spasms, uncontrolled epilepsy, or progressive encephalopathy is a contraindication aka adverse reaction to administration of any pertussis-containing vaccine, including INFANRIX
- Afebrile seizures were reported at a rate of 13% for a sample of 2,457 individuals (pg 12)
- Inconsolable unusual crying lasting more than 3 hours occurred 9%
- Hypotonic-hyporesponsive occured non-responsive behavior occured 1% of the time

My first child went into one of these hypotonic non-responsive states after her 3rd Dtap. She wouldn't talk, eat or make eye contact and when she went to sleep she slept abnormally long and had neck spasms and twitches for many months after.

She also developed a severe respiratory infection a week later.

In addition, the rest of these adverse reactions are listed without a rate or percentage of occurrence listed.

• Bronchitis
• Respiratory tract infection
• Anaphylactic reaction
• Hypersensitivity
• Encephalopathy neurological brain damage (Declining ability to reason and concentrate, memory loss, personality change, seizures, and twitching are common symptoms)
• Hypotonia (commonly known as floppy baby syndrome, is a state of low muscle strength sometimes causing and inability to stand or walk)
• Syncope (Symptoms include paleness, nausea, sweating, a rapid heartbeat, and fainting)
• Cyanosis ( a bluish discoloration to hands or feet, usually caused by low oxygen levels in the red blood cells or problems getting oxygenated blood to your body)
  Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (listed at the bottom of page 12)

And the big one for me is that in this manufacturer package insert is clearly states " studies have not been conducted with INFANRIX. It is also not known whether INFANRIX can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity." (pg 13)

Yet this year they have begun to pressure pregnant women in doctors offices and hospitals around the country to get this vaccine. I have discussed this with mother's who miscarried shortly after receiving this vaccine and it is very heartbreaking. Who has decided to push this on pregnant women?

The CDC states on their website as of July 2017 "The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that pregnant women receive the whooping cough vaccine for adolescents and adults (called Tdap vaccine) during the third trimester of each pregnancy.Jul 24, 2017" yet there are no studies to support this decision.

In my opinion this is a very serious situation putting lives at risk and for what? For corporate gain? Many can speculate as to why but the why isn't as important as questioning everything coming from the CDC when they have clearly been corrupted by special interests.

But is it really surprising that sectors of our government have been corrupted by special interests?

I will admit, sometimes, vaccines do exactly as they were intended without causing an adverse reaction but for those who aren't so lucky they are chastised and ridiculed when they themselves were not informed and then left to deal with the life long consequences that can occur.

So let me get this straight !!
"These same people"

You will try to avoid aluminum in deodorant?

You will try to avoid bromides because of your thyroid?

You will try to avoid formaldehyde in soda?

You will try to avoid mercury in tuna?

You will try to avoid Chemicals in food?

You will try to avoid germs/bacteria by washing hands?

You are trying to avoid viruses?

You will try to avoid antibiotics in meat?

You will try to avoid Pro Inflammatory foods?

You will try to avoid foods that can make you Infertile?

If you needed a blood transfusion You would avoid someone else's blood if it wasn't a match right?

You might be against abortions?

Etc etc

But let's just inject healthy babies with vaccines
SMH

I know, once you start reading the inserts and talk with parents or experience these "adverse reactions" yourself you will start to realize they happen way too often and each shot is not the same. To put a blanket statement like "vaccines are safe" is not only untrue but since each batch of each vaccine is different it is very much a risk every time you get an injection. Perhaps some have less rates of adverse reactions but the bottom line, aluminum and mercury are neurotoxins, when injected into tiny bodies damage is often caused. In addition DNA fragments can cause mutations and when sutoimmune diseases are listed as "possible side affects" you can guarantee there is more going on than your doctor will explain to you. The level of damage depends on the individual physiology but risks such as life long debilitating vaccine caused injury is not something I'm willing to risk because our corporate influenced media and government said so. In addition our doctors receive pharmaceutical bonuses for getting more vaccines distributed so sometimes as much as you doctor may have good intentions, money talks.

safe ONLY if you include life long disabilities, dysfunctions, diseases and death

everything it is chemical. even the air is a mixture of chemicals. would you stop breathing because of chemicals.

@bellsx1 I read the thread between you and @reddust and I understand about what you refer to as the scientific process using long term data to prove causation etc. but a real problem exists in the lack of safety and long term immunity studies prior to administering each vaccine in the first place.

The fact that a manufacturer can go on national television proclaiming a shot like the HPV will save your child from cancer which then influences school districts to enforce and promote the vaccine which has not had long term studies to even prove its effectiveness or safety. I know there is a whole group of physicians and immunologists out there working together to try and develop vaccines without aluminum and other harmful preservatives but it is very difficult to do especially without substantial funding.

In general I don't think its helpful for our collective evolution to belittle each other's personal experiences or concerns. A mother with a child who was smart, happy and developing right on track but then following routine vaccines ends up with a non-responsive, seizure ridden child who cries for hours at a time inconsolably no longer communicating and functioning normally will likely be very emotional about the topic of vaccines.

For those of us who have been lucky with vaccines and haven't experienced long-term adverse effects doesn't mean those who have are lying nor is it helpful for our collective evolution to deny those individuals the respect to share their stories and information. Not saying you did that but it happens quite often and shouldn't be socially acceptable.

Well, I do agree with this. Here in the Phils. some kids died coz of the dengue vaccines they got.
It's been a big issue here now.

Many children died or became sick in India after Bill Gates vaccines. They didn't even tell the children or their parents what they were being injected with or what the side-effects were. The media, big pharma, Gates and the government more or less try to ignore these uncomfortable conversations.

I was not born in a hospital, only at home by a midwife. I have never been vaccinated. I have never been admitted to a hospital. I don't take medicines when I get sick but I get well anyway. Is it just luck or am I a living miracle? Nah! I am but normal and not drug dependent.

It's amazing what the body can achieve naturally when you don't inject chemicals into your body!

That's true!

The poison is in the supposed cure! If people would actually focus and stop believing they would see the outbreak happens after the "cure" is released. We don't want to be cured like meat and dried out. We want to be hydrated and healthy.
This just happened in the media with the dog flu vaccine. After it started being a diminished a year ago there is now a "serious" outbreak. They throw it directly into our faces.

I am going to print this out and bring it to my pharmacist, who concluded that I am a "nutcase", after my refusal of a free flu shot. I recommend we all do the same. Fortunately, I am in NH and they allow a religious exemption to vaccines. Prior to that, I was in NY, where a board weight my 'religious' exemption, and concluded that my religious exemption did not meet their standards. So now, we have states looking into and concluding whether our religious beliefs are valid. It's all a scam, in my opinion.

You got a 15.32% upvote from @postpromoter courtesy of @steemtruth! Want to promote your posts too? Check out the Steem Bot Tracker website for more info. If you would like to support development of @postpromoter and the bot tracker please vote for @yabapmatt for witness!

Ok that was long article and I have so many questions...
Let's go to the first figure:
* First of all one of the source links doesn't work anymore.
* Second why should you link vaccines to child mortality. There are like a number of factors that could come into play, like quality and cost of healthcare service.
Second Figure
* What is the excact source of that figure, quoting a bunch of books, doesn't really counts as a source in my books.
* Also once again, there could be a number of reasons for the increase and you would need to provide with additional statistics exclude other reasons.
Third Figure
* What is the number of non-vaccinated childreen dying of sudden infant death syndrom?
Fourth Figur*
* Did you read the linked source? The conclusion of the article seems to indecate no link, but a rather inaccurate image because of the way prior studies were conducted.
Fith and sixth Figure
* Well the organisastion behind those 2 figures is critized for bad studies.
* Speaking of which, studies looking at less than 1000 cases are not considerd evidence in science, aren't they?
Seventh Figure
* Well since I couldn't find the given source and looked for other newer studies and the general conclusion is that there is no link. (In case Google "Vaccines and Diabetes")
* On a additional note who is the author of that study? Dr John B Classen, the one of the few suggesting that link, was disproven multiple times.See Page 1, second half, the pragraph(Do vaccines cause diabetes)
Eight Figure
* Once again what is the figure for unvaccinated childreen in comparision to vaccines?
* Ever heard of correlation is not causation? There are a number of studies, some conducted by foundations trying to battle autism and they found no link and since have given up on the trail.
Ninth Figure
* Mercury in vaccines is proven to be non harmful to the body.
* Modern vaccinates doesn't contrain any mercury nowdays. So even if vaccnine mercury would be harmful, that risk couldn't exist anymore.
* Did you ever heard of the lead crisis in Flintstone. Lead was and is a common material of water pipes and paint in America. This lead(which is also very poisious) is known and acknowleged by congress and the scientific community to be the cause of mental impairments in childree. More Information
Thenth Figure**
* So aside from the scientific opinion on the "science" presented by the source documantation and my oppinion on the creator "Steve Bannon", there are this numbers coming from?
* See my points on mercury in the ninth figure.

So after all, I cannot agree with your conclusion about the link between all that bad stuff and vaccines. I'm really sorry that there ever was that original study about the supposed harm from vaccines, which time and time again has been disproven and it's author is no longer a doctor.
I know, that this is a battle I won't win here, but I can only hope that it helps a bit. For people interested into the whole battle between pro and anti-vaccines I can link you to this piece.
And to anyone wanting to lynch me, I give you a last piece to think about: Ever heard about Polio? Once almost every child was at risk to be infected and be scarred for life or ended up dying. Thanks to vaccines(before people start to spread false fears about it) it is nearly extinct.

I am happy to find more and more people who are not blind like all the rest!!
I support anti-vaccination in Russia and I am not tired to know more and more proofs that vaccines are just a slow bomb!

I'm so pleased to see a Russian woman that knows about the dangers of vaccines. I hope that many of your countrymen think the same as you or are at least beginning to question what the doctors and government is telling them. Spasiba @taliakerch

oh, no, unfortunately there are not so many anti-vaccinators in Russia, most people are blind and belive in medicine, doctors and pills, and they even don't want to listen anything against... they are just sleeping, they are not ready to know the truth, or they are just on another level of development..
anyway, I am happy I was awoken some years ago, and opened my eyes in what world I live. Here on Steemit I can speak about it free, but in Russia - no, because most people are not tolerant and agressive to these activities. For example on Golos (Russian clon of Steemit) I didnt speak about it because one I tried, it caused shock and strong agression. Why should I fight with blind? They just can't awaken.
I am happy here I have found support!

Thanks for sharing the truth and spreading awareness about vaccines. Insightful and well written post! Much appreciated!

Thank you very much!

I was harmed by Anthrax shots. Half the normal hearing range was destroyed. Now I have all sorts of new food allergies too.

Vaccines? No thanks.

The shots ruined my immune system. I'm certainly not going to risk my children suffering a similar or worse fate either.

I'm sorry to hear that. Unfortunately testimonies like yours are far too common. If you haven't written about your experience I would encourage you to. Please let me know if you do and I'll support you.

Thank you for sharing your experience @finnian. Following you.

It's a good idea for a post, and I've added it to my forever lengthening list of topics. :)

here in Australia, of you dont vaccinate, your kids cant go to school and you get all your government childcare allowances stopped. Its fucked

It is sure. Governments act as if they own your children, they don't. It is parents job to chose. It's one more reason not to send kids to school and homeschool them instead.

this is all the business of big pharma's and some countries. I am a volunteer of 'Art of living' and Its my experience that regular practice of sudarshan kriya(a breathing technique) increases immunity. No pills since november 2015, help me spread the message. https://www.artofliving.org/in-en/what-sudarshan-kriya

I wish more people would realize this, it is very sad! Thank you for sharing!

This raises the question whether we humans are using the extra knowledge in favor or are depriving ourselves from what the nature has offered

You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. The benefits of vaccination extend beyond prevention of specific diseases in individuals. They enable a rich, multifaceted harvest for societies and nations. Vaccination makes good economic sense, and meets the need to care for the weakest members of societies. Reducing global child mortality by facilitating universal access to safe vaccines of proven efficacy is a moral obligation for the international community as it is a human right for every individual to have the opportunity to live a healthier and fuller life.
By not taking vaccines you're not only a hazard to yourself, but to the society, threatening future generations.

Spreading fake news and propaganda on steemit is just dumb. Please try to read up on the subject from valid sources. Here's a bunch you could read up on:

http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/86/2/07-040089/en/

I'm sure you guys would say that the "World health Organisation" is corrupt and stupid. But before taking such conclusions, if you're serious about your view on vaccines, go through their references. They listed numeric of sources backing up what they write about vaccines.

Examples: Plotkin SL, Plotkin SA. A short history of vaccination. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, eds. Vaccines, 4th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2004: 1-15.

Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety. 3–4 December 2003. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2004; 79: 16-20.

Zhou W, Pool V, Iskander JK, English-Bullard R, Ball R, Wise RP, et al. Surveillance for safety after immunisation: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) – United States, 1991–2001. MMWR Surveill Summ 2003; 52: 1-24.

Christenson B, Hedlund J, Lundbergh P, Ortqvist A. Additive preventive effect of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in elderly persons. Eur Respir J 2004; 23: 363-8.

This is totally a false claim! Vaccine do not kills children or anybody...its saves people life! To claim why vaccine kills, one should all understand how it works in the first place...WATCH this video on vaccines by our very own John Oliver on "The benefits of vaccines far outweigh the minuscule risks, but some parents still question their safety". He debunks this nasty myth about vaccine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VG_s2PCH_c

Hello!

@sco just published an article finding some MAJOR MISTAKES in your argumentation. I would encourage you to read it and then answering to the arguments. Here is a link: Investigating the truth behind steemtruth’s “truth” - Part 3: Vaccines kill children?

I dont wan't this to be driven by hate or anything, I just want you to take part in what you want yourself:

>It’s time that we had fair, transparent and intelligent conversations and debates at the local, national and global level.

If you stick to your words, you will read his article, think about it and answer to it!

Greets,
Martin

Thank you for alerting me to this post Martin and for giving me an opportunity to respond. I will go through the post and respond in due course. This will take some time so please give me that time. I will respond. Please do not ask me for updates. You will hear from me within a week at the latest.

Great :) I don't want to hurry you, good research takes time. I think we all prefer a well-thought answer after one week to a rushed one after one hour!

This sensitive subject spreads world wide. As far as I know, this problem exploded after The Lancer's publication (British health magazine) in 1998.
13 medics created a false study "Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis and pervasive developmental disorder in children" including only 12 children (it's mandatory for such studies to involve at least 1000-2000 volunteers), besides, some of them were related to each other (brother-sister). The study claims that there's a connection between autism, inflammatory bowel disease and MMR vaccines. Also those doctors withdrew their statement some of them losing their practice rights, but this part was just too hard for media to fix.
Shortly, vaccination is the administration of antigens (small fractions of microbes) that only stimulates your body to produce antibodies (against those specific antigens) that remain into your body to fight a (very) possible infection that otherwise would cause disease.
Of course, just like everything on this planet, it may have adverse reactions, there may be some isolated cases of death, but focusing on the advantages, life expectancy have raised significantly in the last century due, between other progress associated factors, to vaccines.
I will come up with an article with more details.
Take care! :)

https://steemit.com/steemstem/@dragulaura06/false-study-mmr-vaccine

Thank you for this very informative article. I had a student research this topic and know that it is extremely difficult to get recent statistics - something that is probably by design. I watched VAXXED and am now set to watch a new 7-part series entitled The Truth About Vaccines (sign-up to watch the videos is free).

Thanks for the link. I have registered for the series. I have seen Ty's other videos about cancer. I'm looking forward to this one about vaccines.

I think you are right. Please also check out https://steemit.com/health/@steemsheep/the-real-reasons-for-sids-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-and-how-to-prevent-it