This DELETE = REWARDS feature. Seems like it's incentiving people to keep the network free of bloat which is a fair call.
But... what happens if I DELETE a video (that I CREATED) but then others that saved it don't think it should be deleted. Do I get rewards for deleting if the video continues on the network? Who then is considered the content owner? What if that video (hosted by someone else) goes viral suddenly, does the original creator get rewards back even though on their ledger they chose to have that video deleted?
What if then the video happens to have content which may one day be subject to legal issues? If I had deleted it.. BUT CREATED THE ORIGINAL who has to deal with the legal issues? The person still holding onto it or the creator?
Or if the CREATOR deletes it does the whole network need to obey that request?
Personally I don't like this delete feature because even on YT just because a video isn't getting big views or getting monetized it's still an asset for the historical element. For example, sometimes people get nostalgic and want to revisit old crap.
If this delete feature exists as a way for people to seek rewards then it's like eating and vomiting. In not necessarily that logical order.
Eating and simply allowing the digestive system to extract the value is what works. Sometimes we might need to vomit but it's rare and then we most definitely never eat our own vomit. Dogs do that.
That analogy might be odd so let me move on ...
I understand you can't host everything forever but watching the video of the dev calls I had a different thought. Language and words for instance. If we as humans are to delete obsolete words (or rarely used languages) then we simply lose knowledge.
In internet terms:
If for instance bad drawings done in mspaint were to be wiped from internet history we would not have the wonders of meme culture which nowadays essentially lives strong through badly drawn works. Such as THE CHAD vs THE VIRGIN. Furthermore if every meme needed to be to professional standards, then we lose the richness of what we can all collective contribute to and then appreciate.
Like the example in the video, a cat video would be subject to deletion. But then that starves people of the priceless pleasure of wanting to watch endless cat videos.
I guess it's also like memories. What kind of mind would one posses if we decided every night to delete our memories. Actually our mind does sort them according to importance by some unknown algorithm but they're still there though. Only to be triggered some way in the future by some seemingly irrelevant cue.
CONTENT IMO is like that.
See I even see it as belonging to everyone once uploaded. Even if the content creator of a cat video has stopped seen it as value.. a person that then comes along and wants to make a compilation of cat behavior would seek that out. To them a 10+ year collection of cat videos would be highly valuable. If everyone deleted it then it's simply lost and we all lose that great joy of what cats can bring.
I understand money is an inportant element to this here Hive and projects that are emerging from it so then I think, is that then what kills the cat? Not curiosity.. but the need to always chase a momentary reward for everything?