The other day I commented on an article that had a picture of Sathya Sai Baba in it.

I wasn't initially aware, but the picture was taken at a Sathya's ashram. I shouldn't have commented on it, then, as the probable sole purpose of the article was to promote the personality of the guru, as opposed to genuine love.

Anyway, the article just had a picture of a vague message to love everybody.

I wrote under it that we should indeed love everybody, even Sathya, whose picture was included in the frame.

I got a response from a Sathya's supported who, using an extremely erotic language, tried to refute the allegations that Sathya was a pedophile. They wrote:

i didnt say hungry did i> What emanated from his eyes was PURE divine love.. like a mother x 100.. it gave me the feeling of being a divine being and i felt a kind a bliss and love that I have never felt before..

Doesn't it read as a description of having an orgasm in the presence of Sathya or one of their followers?

And what does it have to do with anything? The author didn't address the allegations at all. They could have just ignored me instead of describing their orgasmish experiences in the ashram.

Still, I got downvoted several times, which is maybe for the better.

I shouldn't have started this blog

From Steemit I learned that there are actually smart people who share my beliefs. I have nothing to add to their articles, and they probably do not have much to add to mine.

They are better writers than myself, and they are more committed.

I have nothing left to contribute thru religious blogging, since there are already people who describe spirituality well, and I would be just duplicating their work.

I am loosing interest in publicly speaking about religion anyway. I haven't created a coven or something thruout the last couple of years, so why would anybody bother to read my content?

I used to write about my mouse sanctuary, but no donations would come in, and I would probably have nothing to teach, so for the time being I will keep it to myself.